| === genii is now known as genii-core | ||
| === krzk is now known as Guest1226 | ||
| maxzor_ | When is the Jammy release hard hard freeze again please? The moment when a debian ftp upload doesn't land anymore in Jammy | 06:33 |
|---|---|---|
| cpaelzer | maxzor_: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/jammy-jellyfish-release-schedule/23906 | 06:51 |
| cpaelzer | 24th Feb | 06:51 |
| maxzor_ | shit shit shit | 06:52 |
| maxzor_ | debian NEW <3 | 06:52 |
| gombara | hello. I have been trying to automate install of Ubuntu 21.10 desktop. All the information I could found online points to modifying grub.cfg to provide command line options to kernel. but for some reason I could not get it working. after the boot it lands in live session desktop instead of starting the install. any ideas? | 07:07 |
| RikMills | cpaelzer: sorry to be random, but I think your libvirt bileto build just got clobbered by LP: #1959325 | 08:44 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1959325 in binutils (Ubuntu) "New binutils causes build failures for many RISC-V packages" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1959325 | 08:44 |
| RikMills | for once the bileto build fail spam was useful ;) | 08:44 |
| slingamn | i got a pull request merged into the upstream system-config-printer: https://github.com/OpenPrinting/system-config-printer/pull/247 | 09:59 |
| ubottu | Pull 247 in OpenPrinting/system-config-printer "remove python3-requests" [Merged] | 09:59 |
| slingamn | i'm trying to determine the best way to get it to land in ubuntu 22.04 | 09:59 |
| slingamn | should i ask upstream about whether they plan to include it in a tagged release? | 10:00 |
| === Guest1226 is now known as krzk | ||
| schopin | slingamn: your best bet would be to ask the Desktop team directly (#ubuntu-desktop) since this package seems to be under their umbrella | 10:02 |
| slingamn | legit, thanks | 10:03 |
| === krzk is now known as Guest1121 | ||
| cpaelzer | thanks for the hint RikMills | 10:35 |
| RikMills | cpaelzer: np. at least I assume those 'mis-matched ISA version' error are the reason for the fail | 10:37 |
| RikMills | not the sort of log I am used to | 10:38 |
| cpaelzer | I can at least say that this build find the last few days | 10:39 |
| cpaelzer | so whatever it is, it came into jammy rather recently | 10:40 |
| cpaelzer | and my latest changes had nothing that would break builds this way | 10:40 |
| RikMills | cpaelzer: the binutils with the breaking change is recent, yes | 10:42 |
| RikMills | not sure atm why some thing seemd to be immune, and others not | 10:43 |
| === Guest1121 is now known as krzk | ||
| seb128 | hum, is there some known issue with the new binutils update on riscv64? accountsservice build failed with new symbols error but those were not there with a build earlier in the week and not an issue on other archs | 11:33 |
| RikMills | seb128: LP: #1959325 | 11:37 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1959325 in binutils (Ubuntu Jammy) "New binutils causes build failures for many RISC-V packages" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1959325 | 11:37 |
| schopin | seb128: apparently there's been a change in the toolchain bumping the -march definition or... something. | 11:37 |
| seb128 | RikMills, would that lead to new symbols? that report doesn't have any details nor build log reference | 11:37 |
| seb128 | doko, ^ is that a regression you are working on addressing today or maybe we should remove the buggy binutils from proposed? | 11:38 |
| RikMills | buggy binutils is in -release :( | 11:38 |
| RikMills | seb128: not sure about the new symbols | 11:39 |
| RikMills | seb128: I see the 'mis-matched ISA version' error from that bug in the account-service build log, but not sure if that itself is related to the new symbols or just coincidental | 11:42 |
| RikMills | hopefully doko can shed some light | 11:42 |
| doko | this is a mess, introduced by the RISC-V engineers, currently trying to figure out what to do. No, binutils is not "buggy" at this point | 11:46 |
| RikMills | doko: appreciated, thanks :) | 11:47 |
| schopin | bluca: FYI I've just filed LP: #1959414 and I figured this might impact your request LP: #1951314 | 15:10 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1959414 in tpm2-tss-engine (Ubuntu) "Please remove tpm2-tss-engine from Jammy" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1959414 | 15:10 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1951314 in tpm2-tss-engine (Ubuntu) "[BPO] Please backport tpm2-tss-engine 1.1.0-2 (universe) from jammy" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1951314 | 15:10 |
| bluca | thanks | 15:11 |
| bluca | will try to get the openssl3 one sorted soon | 15:11 |
| Laibsch | found a potential regression in moc package when going from focal to jammy and reported as bug 1959412 | 15:12 |
| ubottu | Bug 1959412 in moc (Ubuntu) "no more sound in jammy" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1959412 | 15:12 |
| Laibsch | confirmations welcome | 15:12 |
| utkarsh2102 | hey | 16:28 |
| utkarsh2102 | I can't seem to upgrade libc6-lse to what's in Focal-proposed | 16:29 |
| utkarsh2102 | I have libc6 version 2.31-0ubuntu9.4. | 16:29 |
| utkarsh2102 | but when I install libc6-lse, I get: | 16:30 |
| utkarsh2102 | libc6-lse : Depends: libc6 (= 2.31-0ubuntu9.2) but it is not going to be installed | 16:30 |
| utkarsh2102 | any idea around this, doko, mwhudson? | 16:30 |
| ahasenack | is the source for libc6-lse the same? | 16:39 |
| ahasenack | it's indeed not in focal-proposed | 16:39 |
| ahasenack | at 0ubuntu9.4 | 16:40 |
| bdmurray | Is this bug 1912652? | 16:47 |
| ubottu | Bug 1912652 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Hirsute) "Upgrading libc6-lse breaks on systems it is in use" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1912652 | 16:47 |
| bdmurray | rbasak: Is the SRU of bug 1789454 something you'd have concerns about given the verification involving MATE (comment #13)? | 16:54 |
| ubottu | Bug 1789454 in gsmartcontrol (Ubuntu) "gsmartcontrol immediately crashes while running smartctl" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1789454 | 16:54 |
| RikMills | doko: sorry to bother you. do you have any sort of update on the riscv64 issue? if not, then no worries. it is after all end-of-week | 17:14 |
| rbasak | bdmurray: yes, and also for the Ubuntu MATE case if third party repositories are needed to reproduce. If it's not reproduced on Ubuntu using the Ubuntu archive, then is an SRU justified? | 17:26 |
| rbasak | Eg. if it only happens with that PPA, then the PPA should just as easily be able to patch it there without disrupting non-PPA users. | 17:26 |
| rbasak | Or else, I think we need to decide policy-wise what to do when someone wants a fix for something that only reproduces in a scenario with third party software whose use Ubuntu doesn't really support. | 17:30 |
| rbasak | (in an SRU specifically - obviously the development release is different) | 17:30 |
| xnox | utkarsh2102: i'm not entirely sure if we do or don't support inplace upgrades to libc6-lse; in later releases libc6-lse is just built into normal libc6 | 18:03 |
| === genii-core is now known as genii | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!