[12:16] thanks! and sorry I didn't get back to this right away. I've added liberty center one, to our short and hopefully growing list. 123.net was already on the list. [12:17] llua, interesting in a good way, and you'd recommend them? [12:22] we'll be renting whole rack(s) as we'll need at least 36u, we'll want physical access so in the greater Detroit area. and really if the price were right I would guess extending that to ann arbor wouldn't be out of the question if the services and price worked out [12:28] jrwren, somewhere we'd bring/ship our own hardware to and would need physical access to. at least initially I suspect we'll be doing tape backups there so one of us would be there weekly. server hunter does look to be a pretty cool site though and is good to know about [14:48] sounds like a lot of work ;) [14:54] But cheaper than cloud. [14:55] We perennially get folks telling us to just use AWS or azure for our stuff. We'd be out of money in a year. [14:56] (I made up the timeline, but we've done the calculations, we can't do it without multiple hundreds of millions per year or something) [14:56] We only raise ~110 million [14:57] "only" [15:02] so next week I'll know more about what's going on with my "malignant neoplasm of the rectum" [15:02] woo hoo. [15:02] CT Scan, MR Scan [15:03] Again, good luck [15:03] Thank you. :) [15:40] yup, cloud is insanely expensive if you are able to execute on the cheap. [15:41] not to mention all the dumb shit AWS convinces people to use. NLB when you don't need it. Route53 for overpriced DNS. CloudHSM, becuase of course you need a hardware security module. [15:55] cmaloney: <3 [19:50] thanks! we aren't ready to go to the cloud for our data so the cost aspect was good to read [20:10] That's good [20:54] greg-g: we spend more than that on AWS/yr. :)