[01:39] <vorlon> rbasak, teward, ddstreet: is the DMB able to accept the invitation for ubuntu-core-dev to join ~unity7maintainers? it seems an invite was sent 2 years ago but never accepted; this is the team owning the seed branches for ubuntu-unity-meta. https://launchpad.net/~unity7maintainers/+members
[01:41] <teward> vorlon: i mean, i can, but i bet it got ignored because it wasn't a canonical person, etc. who made the invitation
[01:41] <vorlon> teward: right, well, I would appreciate the invite being accepted, so that core-devs can update the metapackage :)
[01:41] <teward> (I don't want to unilaterally do that though without an OK from at least a few others on DMB - unilateral decisions are bad usually)
[01:42] <teward> vorlon: *points at last message for obvious reasons*
[01:42] <teward> i'll prod the ML and if there's no objections by EOD Tomorrow (Saturday) I'll JFDI
[01:47] <teward> email sent to the rest of the DMB, bug me again tomorrow vorlon (or worst, Monday morning) and i'll just do it if there are no objections.  Sooner if there's positive agreement.  I try and *not* take unilateral action unless we have documented cases for unilateral actions (like someone's privs just accidentally expired or something).
[21:35] <vorlon> teward: hi, are we good to join ~unity7maintainers?  ubuntu-unity-meta is the last blocker for app-install-data-partner removal from the archive