/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/02/01/#ubuntu-server.txt

cpaelzerbryceh: so your local build which isn't a full container more a chroot did change your systems time, that sounds wrong :-) Was that reproducible or didn't you try to not mess up the system more?06:15
cpaelzeras sdeziel said, for real containers you do not have CAP_SYS_TIME which some handle better than others, but if your env was really just a (s)chroot then your case isn't the same06:16
brycehcpaelzer, very reproducible.  I created a second fresh lxc container and reproduced it there as well.06:53
cpaelzeroh so it really was lxd container then06:57
brycehcorrect06:58
cpaelzerbryceh: any chance we could replace ntpd in that env with chrony (the meant to work and supported ntp server) or at least (more a drop in replacement) ntpsec ?06:58
cpaelzerthe world is about to stop caring for classic ntpd in favor of one or the other06:58
brycehdo you mean temporarily for testing, or permanently as in the autopkgtest config?06:59
brycehcpaelzer, I think my next step will be to redo the merge from scratch and see if it occurs again, or if I can spot where an error crept in.  If that still repro's I'll post the branch for someone else to doublecheck.07:05
cpaelzersounds fine if it wasn't a 5 day effort that you are now re-doing :-)07:06
cpaelzerand I meant temporarily for testing, depending on the outcome we can then make long term decisions07:06
=== slyon_ is now known as slyon
=== jchittum_ is now known as jchittum
=== jgee0 is now known as jgee
=== lotuspsychje_ is now known as lotuspsychje
=== haggertk_ is now known as haggertk
=== kenyon_ is now known as kenyon
ahasenackgood morning11:52
* kanashiro waves11:54
=== jgee6 is now known as jgee
ahasenackquick non-scientific poll: do you use ansible on ubuntu server? Or is it too old?14:45
rbasakI do. I use the version of ansible currently packaged in Focal.14:49
cpaelzerahasenack: I'm sure you've seen it, but there is feedback on the FRR MIR15:21
ahasenackcpaelzer: yes, I saw it in the morning16:03
ahasenackparide: https://pypi.org/project/ansible/ says latest ansible is 5.2.0, but the github project has "stable-2.X" branches16:28
ahasenackand there is a split somewhere, ansible-core16:28
ahasenackcan you give a quick tl;dr?16:28
ahasenack2.12 seems to be the latest stable, is that? What is 5.2.0 then?16:28
ahasenackhttps://groups.google.com/g/ansible-announce/c/Aw5eGIHgpkg <-- announcement for 2.12.1, ansible-core 2.11.7, ansible-base 2.10.16, just a few months old16:29
parideahasenack, it seems that they ramped up the versions numbers rather quickly https://groups.google.com/g/ansible-announce/search?q=release16:39
ahasenackThe homepage ansible.com is impossible to use :/16:39
parideahasenack, the timeline in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansible_(software) is useful but lacks sources16:45
parideI mean, lacks references to official sources16:45
ahasenackand meaning16:46
ahasenackI see yellow for "extended support" in the legend, but no yellow in the graph16:46
ahasenackmaybe worth asking in their channel16:47
ahasenacktheir #topic: " * latest releases: ansible 5.2.0, 2.9.27; ansible-core 2.12.2, 2.11.8; ansible-base 2.10.17; ansible 2.8 is EOL 💀; ansible 2.9 EOL announcement https://groups.google.com/g/ansible-announce/c/kegIH5_okmg/"16:47
paridemaybe https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/devel/reference_appendices/release_and_maintenance.html  explains, reading...16:48
parideahasenack, actually the latest NEWS entry helps: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ansible/-/blob/master/debian/NEWS16:56
ahasenackis there another source in debian too?16:58
parideyes, ansible-core16:59
paridebut ansible (2.10.7+merged+base+2.10.8+dfsg-1) they merged ansible-base (= ansible-core) into ansible, for some reason. 17:02
ahasenackaha, that's what "merged" means in that version17:06
ahasenacksounds like debian is still experimenting with this17:07
ahasenackhmml, that is not the experimental one even17:07
ahasenackit's a huge package, over 200Mb installed17:21
ahasenacklooks like it has tests installed as well17:21
ahasenackparide: I'm finding that many fixes that were in ansible-core (deb) were not pulled into the new merged ansible package17:52
ahasenackmaybe they were just in experimental at that time, could be17:52
znfahasenack, there's a reason ansible folks recommend using ansible from pip :)18:54
ahasenackpip has 5.2, which from my understanding is a bundle18:55
ahasenackthe core/base bits, and some "curated" playbooks I think18:55
rbasakznf: that's a really common recommendation from most upstreams. Yet most of us use most of our software from distribution packages :)18:57
znfsome packages have a very fast release/development cycle (like ansible)18:59
znfand there's a certain point you kinda want the new features :)19:00
rbasakEvery two years, when there's a new LTS out. Then it's on a nice, predictable cadence :)19:02
rbasakThen it's nicely in phase with the support cycles of the machines I'm actually managing, too. The last thing I want is to find some issue with the playbook of an existing deployment that worked previously because something did a major version bump without coordination, or for me to be unable to reproduce a setup that worked previously.19:04
sergiodjkanashiro: FWIW https://code.launchpad.net/~sergiodj/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/41490519:18
kanashirosergiodj, thanks!19:19
sergiodjafter that's processed, there'll be only jekyll19:20
kanashiroI have jekyll almost fixed locally19:38
=== genii is now known as genii-core

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!