[07:49] <tjaalton> anyone using sublime-text as the $EDITOR? I'm having issues with dch, they don't seem to play along :)
[07:52] <tjaalton> ah, needs -w
[09:51] <juliank> autopkgtest cloud is down for maintenance, see #ubuntu-release for details; should be back up soon
[10:06] <juliank> autopkgtest cloud seems better now, ongoing monitoring
[11:32] <juliank> The design of rabbitmq means that if it is about to run out of memory, it blocks publishers
[11:32] <juliank> consumers can consume
[11:33] <juliank> If you wonder why autopkgtest-cloud completely blocks, the answer is that in order to consume the item; after the test is run, it tries to publish a notification that the test has finished
[11:33] <juliank> alongside other status images
[11:33] <juliank> so all our consumers are publishers too and the whole thing deadlocks of sort
[11:35] <juliank> what we can do is restart it regularly
[11:35] <juliank> should add a cron job
[12:04] <ahasenack> good morning
[13:38] <ahasenack> excuses is lagging, Generated: 2022.02.07 11:18:07 +0000
[13:38] <ahasenack> that's over 2h ago
[13:39] <ahasenack> at least the log is current, so it's running: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/jammy/2022-02-07/
[13:55] <teward> vorlon: fyi coredev is now part of that unity group
[13:55] <teward> finally got a hold of simon so he approved the add just now
[16:02] <sil2100> !dmb-ping
[16:03] <teward> sil2100: *steals a $20 from your wallet to buy lots of caffeine*
[16:04] <rbasak> o/
[16:12] <cpaelzer> hi rbasak and lena - doko asked if we could have a look at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdbd-mysql-perl/4.050-4build1
[16:12] <cpaelzer> any immediate opinions on that to be related to the new mysql?
[16:13] <vorlon> teward: yep, I've already pushed my branch and uploaded the metapackage, thanks
[16:14] <teward> yep, just letting you know
[16:32] <lena> cpaelzer: Looking into the build logs it seems like the transition to OpenSSL 3.0 is causing the error. I'll keep digging to see what the problem is specifically
[18:35] <xnox> doko:  not sure why i started talking on the #debian-devel channel; but it seems that dwz doesn't do anything with .ko kernel module files.
[18:35] <xnox> will continue with dwo / dwp experiments
[19:28] <Eickmeyer> sil2100 bdmurray: Hi! RE: bug 1959971: I don't think the size allocations take it far enough, especially with initrd's if nvidia drivers are installed.
[19:28] <Eickmeyer> See bug 1960089 for more info on that.
[19:29] <Eickmeyer> I was thinking of marking as dupe, but I don't know if that's the way to go.
[21:33] <Eickmeyer> juliank: Would it make sense to patch focal's version of packagekit with this commit? https://github.com/PackageKit/PackageKit/commit/fe883921fa627666d50f4861fdcf23fb747630cc
[21:34] <Eickmeyer> Would help to prevent some overfull boot directories RE: bug 1914278
[21:35] <juliank> Eickmeyer: that's a bit premature,it needs to be in devel first, and then age a couple months at least in a stable release
[21:35] <juliank> ebarretto: The changes are huge
[21:35] <juliank> Ugh sorry
[21:35] <Eickmeyer> juliank: Yeah, I get the SRU process, but once it's in devel would it be easy to backport that particular patch?
[21:36] <Eickmeyer> I mean, in theory.
[21:36] <juliank> Eickmeyer: the changes are huge and not tested yet. I don't know, I haven't tried
[21:36] <Eickmeyer> juliank: Ok, yeah, that was part of my concern since it's basically a difference in ABIs as implied by the version number (1.2 opposed to 1.1)
[21:40] <Eickmeyer> juliank: I think we should just forget about focal at this point, but going forward this is something I helped work with the PackageKit devs on and would be extremely helpful to have in jammy.
[21:46] <Eickmeyer> juliank: I just know that we're getting down to the wire and they haven't pushed a release yet.
[21:46] <Eickmeyer> juliank: I'll test a git snapshot.
[22:54] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: what installation process leaves you with 3 different kernel flavors?
[23:24] <lord_daemon> Goodnight. does anyone use termux + ubuntu + openvpn
[23:26] <sarnold> neither of these channels is for user support, try #ubuntu