[02:23] <bryceh> y'all might need to do a forced-reload of your browser, but I've deployed latest changes for pinot's web interface - http://pinot.endarchy.org/merges-schedule
[02:23] <bryceh> now includes cards for snaps and oci's, and there's detail pages ('...') which includes 'last updated' datetime
[02:23] <bryceh> cya tomorrow
[06:17] <cpaelzer> thanks bryceh LGTM
[06:17] <cpaelzer> and good morning everyone
[06:27]  * bryceh waves
[08:20] <mirespace_> good morning
[10:40] <mirespace_> l
[10:41] <mirespace_> ups... wrong window :$
[10:51] <cpaelzer> I can make use of another "I", np :-)
[12:03] <athos> good morning!
[12:15] <ahasenack> utkarsh2102: hi, what's the samba RFA bug?
[12:37] <mirespace_> hi Athos
[13:14] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814382
[13:14] <ahasenack> that's from 2016
[13:15] <cpaelzer> scroll to the bottom
[13:15] <ahasenack> ok
[13:57] <ahasenack> athos: hm, just saw this: https://salsa.debian.org/dns-team/bind9/-/merge_requests/4
[13:57] <ahasenack> I wonder if dh_apparmor creating an empty profile is an ubuntu delta?
[13:57] <ahasenack> that empty local/<profile> I mean
[14:26] <Odd_Bloke> Hey folks, can someone point me at documentation of the switch to zstd compression for debs?  (Just like an ML thread or a LP bug, I'm not expecting miracles here. ;)
[14:40] <ahasenack> hm, I had that a few days ago
[14:40] <ahasenack> let me check
[14:41] <ahasenack> Odd_Bloke: I have a debian bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892664
[14:41] <kanashiro> there is this email thread: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2018-March/040211.html
[14:41] <ahasenack> the ubuntu bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1923845
[14:42] <ahasenack> "a" ubuntu bug. Lots of tasks in that one
[14:42] <kanashiro> there are some links in this blog post: https://balintreczey.hu/blog/hello-zstd-compressed-debs-in-ubuntu/
[14:58] <Odd_Bloke> Excellent, thank you both!
[15:08] <Odd_Bloke> (Artifactory doesn't support zstd compression, so my life just got very interesting. :)))))
[15:09] <Odd_Bloke> ^ may also be reason to announce this more broadly/officially, FWIW; that's likely going to make life "interesting" for a lot of Ubuntu users.
[16:04] <ahasenack> jammy release notes for sure
[16:35] <pmatulis> is there a way to supply answer 'NO' to the single resulting question without entering the ncurses dialog? dpkg-reconfigure -plow unattended-upgrades
[16:52] <ahasenack> there is a command you can run to set the answer before installing the package
[16:52] <ahasenack> something set-selections iirc
[16:52] <ahasenack> 1s
[16:54] <ahasenack> you have to check in the source or script what variable it is exactly, and then set it with debconf-set-selections
[16:54] <ahasenack> here is an example for setting the "domain" answer when installing slapd (openldap server):
[16:54] <ahasenack> debconf-set-selections slapd slapd/domain string example.com
[16:54] <ahasenack> and for a boolean:
[16:55] <ahasenack> debconf-set-selections slapd slapd/move_old_database boolean false
[16:55] <ahasenack> pmatulis: ^
[17:36] <athos> hey ahasenack! :) It doesnt seem to be anything explicit in our delta (unless it is in the helpers); I am working on reproducers for both debian and ubuntu here :)
[17:38] <athos> ahasenack: still, I get the reproducer here in ubuntu if I do remove the file and reconfigure apparmor! Good thing I do have those builds with and without the line removing the file here :)
[17:39] <ahasenack> well, if the file is removed manually, I do expect apparmor to complain, yes
[17:40] <ahasenack> I think in newer apparmor versions, though, the include directive can be made so that it only includes the file if it exists, so it wouldn't fail
[17:40] <ahasenack> I don't recall if that's a different include directive, or a flag prepended to it, or if it's just default. I also don't remember if this feature is in any released version yet
[17:41] <ahasenack> impish apparmor.d(5):            INCLUDE = ( '#include' | 'include' ) [ 'if exists' ] ( ABS PATH | MAGIC PATH )
[19:20] <ahasenack> mirespace_: hi, your rsync sru was accepted \o/
[19:20] <ahasenack> mirespace_: please check the focal and bionic excuses page tomorrow to see if there are any issues with it
[19:20] <ahasenack> mirespace_: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/bionic/update_excuses.html and https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html
[20:29] <pmatulis> ahasenack, thank you
[22:36] <octav1a> Does ubuntu server 20.04 automatically install updates and if so how may I turn off this feature?
[22:43] <sdeziel> octav1a: I believe it does indeed but you can control the behavior by editing /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades IIRC
[22:45] <octav1a> sdeziel: ahh, that might explain some mishaps. Specifically I just need the kernel not to autopatch
[22:45] <sdeziel> octav1a: sorry, the file to disable the feature is  /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/20auto-upgrades
[22:45] <octav1a> Thank you for the info
[22:49] <sdeziel> octav1a: I'm sure you can configure it so that everything but `linux-image-*` is upgraded
[22:51] <sdeziel> octav1a: actually, if you read /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades, it has a section `Unattended-Upgrade::Package-Blacklist` that should do exactly what you want (and they mention `linux-` in their example)
[23:00] <octav1a> sdeziel: it looks like they thought exactly of me. :p
[23:00] <octav1a> no worries but do you know offhand if some service needs to be restarted to get changes to that file to take effect?
[23:01] <sdeziel> octav1a: I don't think so
[23:02] <octav1a> Okay, I will see. some students in the lab needed the latest nvidia drivers for machinelearning stuff, and I was wondering how it became broken overnight. 
[23:02] <octav1a> but it's not super high priority or anything. 
[23:03] <sdeziel> ah DKMS modules can be annoying sometimes ;)
[23:03] <octav1a> in any other situation I''d just use the package once...but nvidia being nvidia....
[23:03] <octav1a> yeah