[15:40] <OvenWerks> Eickmeyer: no problems here so far... has it gone into the backports?
[15:48] <OvenWerks> Eickmeyer: sorry... "it" = studio-controls
[16:24] <OvenWerks> bringing pipewire will change things a lot. I think for my sanity I need first to add a use pipewire button to tweaks (similar to use ffado)
[16:25] <OvenWerks> this is because my audio device will not work very well with pipewire.
[16:29] <OvenWerks> The next step is to disable pulse bridging if pw is replacing pulse and almost everything else if it is also doing jack.
[16:32] <OvenWerks> The next step is to use the jack master tab to control pw such that the master device in pw is named system and has the defined rate, latency etc.
[16:34] <OvenWerks> The network tab should still work in all these cases I think.
[16:42] <OvenWerks> The extra devices tab while mostly useless, would allow changing the device names and number of ports. headphones might still have some relevence. blacklist, if I can make it work ;)
[16:46] <OvenWerks> The way pw port naming works would allow taking a multi port device and splitting it into smaller devices. So ports 9-10 could be system:playback_1 and 2... hmm that might replace pulse bridging.
[16:46] <OvenWerks> I might need to learn how to rename tabs
[16:47] <OvenWerks> BTW just thinking out loud
[16:47]  * OvenWerks wanders off for the next few hours
[17:26] <OvenWerks> in the long run, pulse will vanish. for most people jack will as well but for some jack will remain an important part of their setup.
[17:28] <OvenWerks> The reality is that studio-controls is not aimed at people who will use jack as their only audio server, it is aimed at those who will switch to pw.
[17:31] <OvenWerks> So future focus should be making pw as jack like as possible. Using jack as a pw device is a special case... 
[17:33] <OvenWerks> or  not. if setting up pw-jack bridges turns out to be similar to pa-jack bridging maybe not.
[18:11] <Eickmeyer> OvenWerks: I haven't put it into backports yet.
[18:11] <Eickmeyer> The rest of that seems like a good roadmap.
[18:27] <Eickmeyer> OvenWerks: So, if you think it's good enough for backports I can do that since this isn't really a major release, unless you think otherwise.
[21:58] <OvenWerks> putting it in backports is basically the only way to get it tested beyond our two systems...
[22:04] <Eickmeyer> Fair.
[22:09] <Eickmeyer> OvenWerks: Ok, uploaded to backports for both focal and impish.