[08:16] <xypron> seb128: I have fixed the debdiff for #1960263
[08:16] <xypron> LP #1960263
[08:36] <alexghiti> Hi guys, can someone trigger a build for me here: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=jammy&arch=i386&package=libdata-validate-uri-perl&trigger=libdata-validate-uri-perl/0.07-2
[08:36] <alexghiti> It's the only architecture that fails for this package, it complains it could not find some packages that I find and there is an error with juju I believe, so that may be worth it
[08:36] <alexghiti> Thanks
[08:52] <ginggs> alexghiti: .
[10:23] <jbicha> xypron: yes, it's already been uploaded. Thank you https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pillow/9.0.0-1ubuntu1
[10:23] <xypron> jbicha: thanks for sponsoring
[11:40] <ricotz> cjwatson, hello, I am hoping you have some suggestion how to deal with a component mismatch for libreoffice, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html - why is it trying to pick "epiphany-browser" when using "Recommends: libreoffice-core (>> 1:7.3.1~rc1), firefox | firefox-esr | epiphany-browser | konqueror | chromium-browser | chromium"
[11:43] <ricotz> all "libreoffice-help-*" package have this Recommends line -- https://paste.debian.net/plain/1231098
[12:30] <cjwatson> ricotz: I guess because desktop-minimal has snap:firefox rather than firefox nowadays.  Not sure what to do about that - I haven't been much involved in the desktop snap migration stuff
[12:32] <cjwatson> ricotz: It's possible that Recommends may have to be dropped to account for browsers being shipped as snaps, not sure :-/
[12:34] <ricotz> cjwatson, hmm, regardless the germinate files, I would expect firefox to be referenced/picked as long its deb packages exist which is currently the state, so I am kind of puzzled here
[12:35] <ricotz> or is such an alternative list not parsed sequentially as I expect
[12:46] <cjwatson> ricotz: That's true, perhaps I'm missing something
[12:46] <cjwatson> ricotz: Might require doing a local test run of germinate to debug - I'm afraid I don't have time for that sort of thing at the moment
[12:59] <ricotz> cjwatson, I see, thank you for taking a look, seem I have no choice to demote those to Suggests
[13:16] <jbicha> ricotz: we can switch snap:firefox to firefox in desktop-minimal once firefox becomes a transitional package (soon)
[13:17] <jbicha> or maybe add 'firefox' instead of switch
[13:18] <ricotz> jbicha, I don't think this will make a difference, but maybe worth a try
[13:26] <jbicha> cjwatson: can we make this work or do we need to keep an Ubuntu diff to avoid the problem where users try to uninstall a key package because they run vrms?
[13:26] <jbicha> https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-ubuntu/-/blob/debian/unstable/debian/rules
[13:26] <jbicha> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-ubuntu/0.83-5/+build/23172460
[13:46] <ahasenack> schopin: no reply from freeradius upstream?
[14:43] <jamespage> cpaelzer: switching convo to here to not clutter -meeting with other noise
[14:43] <schopin> ahasenack: your timing is quite good! they've left a reply 7mn ago!
[14:44] <ahasenack> I haz timing
[14:44] <jamespage> cpaelzer: does the component mismatch report generate based on all binary packages that a source package generates?
[14:45] <ahasenack> "this week", hmm
[14:50] <cpaelzer> jamespage: I think it is just germinate doing germinate things - so auto includes happen but not generally "all binaries"
[14:54] <schopin> ahasenack: I have maybe 3 or 4 packages where upstream told me they'd get a new release out the door before FF. I'm beyond skepticism at this point :P
[15:01] <rbasak> I retried with https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=jammy&arch=amd64&package=pandas&trigger=pytest/6.2.5-1ubuntu2. Why did that use pandas from the release pocket rather than proposed?
[15:02] <rbasak> Am I supposed to add an explicit trigger for it?
[15:04] <rbasak> I don't think it matters now but I'd like to fix my understanding
[15:04] <kanashiro> rbasak, maybe because it was recently published in proposed. When I am dealing with a case like this I add an explicit trigger
[15:05] <utkarsh2102> rbasks: yes, you need an explicit trigger
[15:05] <utkarsh2102> cf: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=jammy&arch=amd64&package=pandas&trigger=pytest/6.2.5-1ubuntu2&trigger=pandas/1.3.5%2bdfsg-2ubuntu1
[15:05] <utkarsh2102> I retried this already
[15:05] <utkarsh2102> so the results should appear here soon
[15:06] <rbasak> OK thanks!
[15:44] <slyon> bluca: hey! I see you tagged systemd 249.10 I'll be merging this into Ubuntu soon. You mentioned the other day that the 29-PORTABLE and 50-DISSECT test stability issues should be resolved in v250+ is there any reference/PR about that, which I could put into a comment?
[15:46] <bluca> thanks - yes, one sec
[15:47] <bluca> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20257
[15:47] <bluca> and kernel 5.15+
[15:47] <ahasenack> schopin: fingers crossed
[15:48] <slyon> bluca: great, thank you very much!
[15:57] <bluca> np
[16:16] <rbasak> utkarsh2102: o/ any progress on ruby-mysql2 dep8 vs. mysql-8.0 yet please?
[16:48] <bdmurray> sarnold: Have you looked for packages with apport package hooks for me before? I don't immediately recall the search criteria.
[16:53] <sarnold> bdmurray: I think I have, yeah, but I've also forgotten what exactly we searched for. "apt-file search /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/" is relatively easy to do on any given release -- probably the raw files that apt-file uses would be useful if we wanted to see all of those across all the releases
[17:04] <bdmurray> sarnold: Given that I just want the package name to then look at the hooks apt-file sounds good.
[17:09] <sarnold> bdmurray: cool; just yell if I can help further, hehe
[17:11] <bdmurray> sarnold: reminding me how to fish is lots of help!
[17:17] <sarnold> bdmurray: hmmm, fishing, sounds like a good idea.. no email, no google meet..
[17:29] <ahasenack> sarnold knows a lot about phishing
[17:31] <sarnold> "here fishy fishy fishy"
[20:08] <bdmurray> jawn-smith: Where was that dirname fix? bug 1960460 is likely a duplicate
[21:10] <jawn-smith> bdmurray: sorry just saw this
[21:10] <jawn-smith> bug 1960083
[21:12] <jawn-smith> That is indeed a duplicate, so I've marked it as such
[21:51] <bdmurray> jawn-smith: sweet, thanks
[22:06] <bdmurray> jawn-smith: I'd just forgotten which actual package the fix was in.
[22:06] <jawn-smith> ah yes, busybox!
[23:53] <bdmurray> seb128 could you look at the verification of bug 1952107 and gnome contacts too some time?