/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/02/17/#ubuntu-devel.txt

=== genii is now known as genii-meeting
=== genii-meeting is now known as genii-core
=== alan_g_ is now known as alan_g
blucajuliank: qq, are the non-x86 cloud autopkgtest running on baremetal of the respective architecture?10:59
blucaor are they all virtualized?10:59
blucaon top of x86 I mean10:59
juliankbluca: they run on vms of their respective architecture; except armhf which runs in lxd in arm64 vms11:00
juliankbluca: it's all openstack11:00
blucagot it, thank you11:00
cjwatsonspecifically VMs running on compute nodes of the corresponding architecture11:00
cjwatsonnot emulated by x8611:00
juliankyes that's what I thought I'd wrote11:01
juliankugh grammar11:01
blucathank you both11:01
cjwatsonyeah, I could just have read "vms of their respective architecture" as talking about either the host or the guest :)11:01
juliankhmm I gotta investigate arm6411:02
juliankit's error rate is a bit high11:03
juliankah yes11:04
juliankthey die after a reboot after EFI stub: Exiting boot services and installing virtual address map...11:04
juliankI think it could be that this is the grub bug with random memory even11:04
juliankWe are currently allocating just enough memory for the file size,11:06
juliank+which means that the kernel BSS is in limbo (and not even zeroed).11:07
ahasenackgood morning11:57
ahasenackrbasak: hi, could you please check the git-ubuntu importer wrt sssd? 2.6.3 was published on the 15th, but ubuntu/devel still points at 2.6.113:46
ahasenackhttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/2.6.3-1ubuntu113:46
ahasenackhttps://code.launchpad.net/~git-ubuntu-import/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+git/sssd/+ref/ubuntu/devel13:46
rbasakahasenack: it's in the queue. I can bump the priority for you13:49
rbasakLooks like git-ubuntu was swamped by language-pack-* uploads13:50
rbasakI've deprioritized those13:50
rbasakAnd I've bumped sssd so that'll be next when a worker slot becomes free13:50
ahasenackthanks rbasak13:52
* ahasenack wonders why nfs-ganesha is in main14:01
ahasenacktwo nfs servers in main14:01
rbasakahasenack: https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform/commit/?id=8f973f0ded862784639d4567791832a5640fa40214:05
ubottuCommit 8f973f0 in ~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform "Seed nfs-ganesha-ceph for general storage and openstack usage"14:05
ahasenackoh14:05
ahasenackjumped into main during focal14:07
ahasenackhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-ganesha/+bug/184340314:08
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1843403 in ntirpc (Ubuntu) "[MIR] nfs-ganesha, ntirpc" [High, Fix Released]14:08
rbasakIs the change to OpenSSL 3.0 also making changes to acceptable/available ciphersuites?14:40
schopinrbasak: it does.14:42
schopinMany algorithms were moved to a "legacy" provider that must be explicitly enabled14:42
schopinrbasak: although... given our default security level, that last part might not have an impact on the actual suites available?14:47
rbasakschopin: I'd like to understand what's changed from a user's perspective, including what must now be explicitly enabled and what is no longer available. Is there a summary available anywhere, please?14:54
GunnarHjHi cjwatson, did you see jbicha's question yesterday?14:55
GunnarHjhttps://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/02/16/%23ubuntu-devel.html#t13:2614:55
schopinrbasak: I'm only aware of https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/man7/migration_guide.html14:55
rbasakschopin: thanks. Does that mean we're following the upstream default? I was under the impression we customised the default config.14:56
schopinI haven't checked this in a while, but I think we "just" raise the default security level, and now that I'm saying this I'm not even sure we're differing from upstream now. I'll go check14:58
schopinrbasak: OK, so Ubuntu default to security level 2, while upstream is at level 1. In addition, we patched OpenSSL to disallow TLS < 1.2 at level 2 (which is a restriction normally for sec level 4).15:02
schopinTHat's the extent of our customization.15:03
rbasakschopin: that's exactly what I needed. Thanks!15:04
rbasakschopin: on, and when did the disallow TLS < 1.2 at level 2 appear in Ubuntu please?15:04
rbasakIs that new in Jammy / OpenSSL 3.0?15:04
schopinNo, it's from 1.1.1d-2ubuntu2 uploaded in 20.0415:05
rbasakOK thanks!15:06
rbasakschopin: can I request that this info goes into the release notes please? I wrote https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/1961268 for now15:09
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1961268 in Release Notes for Ubuntu "OpenSSL changes" [Undecided, New]15:09
schopinrbasak: noted. Are the release notes subject to a freeze?15:11
rbasakschopin: no not at all. Edit at any time.15:12
bdmurrayschopin: sometimes they get edited after release! ;-)15:13
ogayothello, I'm looking for a sponsor for the merge of python-testtools (main) LP #1960297). Thanks!15:20
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1960297 in python-testtools (Ubuntu) "Please merge python-testtools 2.5.0-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196029715:20
jawn-smithogayot: looking15:36
ogayotThanks jawn-smith!15:36
=== seb129 is now known as seb128
=== genii-core is now known as genii
jawn-smithogayot: This looks good to upload, but it would probably be good practice to submit a patch to Debian declaring the packages as 3.10 compatible so we can sync more quickly. As long as it's not super complicated.15:47
ogayotjawn-smith: that sounds good to me, thanks!15:50
rbasakdoko: does openstructure need a rebuild? libost-info2.3 depends on libboost-regex1.74.0-icu67 and that's the latest build on amd64. But I'm a bit puzzled as it looks like you did all the others, so why did that one get missed? Thought I'd check with you first.18:19
Laibschwhy is python3-httpx package no longer synced from unstable or even testing?19:17
Laibschhttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/httpx/0.21.1-1/+build/22469845: missing build-dependency19:19
ahasenackcorrect19:20
ahasenackwhich leads to this build failure on the missing dep: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/httpcore/0.14.3-119:20
ahasenackrelated to python 3.10 and/or openssl 319:21
ahasenack(my guess)19:22
LaibschThanks.  So, what keeps python3-click stuck in proposed, then?  It's another build-time dependency that would not be fulfilled even if python3-httpcore was.19:31
Laibschhttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-click/8.0.3-1 vs. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-click/7.1.2-119:34
dbungertpython-click was related to problems with mailman3 - LP: #1960547, not sure about current state19:37
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1960547 in mailman3 (Ubuntu) "please remove mailman3, mailman-hyperkitty" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196054719:37
LaibschThanks, dbungert.  Looks like simply someone needs to frob the knob to get python3-click to migrate now.19:44
Laibschas is httpx is completely broken jammy, due to newer release not migrating: bug 196134019:47
ubottuBug 1961340 in httpx (Ubuntu) "httpx in jammy is broken" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196134019:47
ahasenackI triggered a retest on python-canmatrix, seems the only red under python-click (s390x)19:50
ahasenackthe failure seems to be dependency related, and is old19:50
ahasenackresult will show up at the top row here: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/python-canmatrix/jammy/s390x19:51
LaibschThx.  So, a rebuild attempt will usually be triggered automatically, without manual intervention?  I previously saw nothing holding python-click back.20:02
LaibschThus, I assumed the need for some explicit frobbing20:04
ahasenackI'm not sure, I've seen rebuilds happening without me touching them, but someone else might have20:08
ahasenackpython-click should migrate now in the next run20:18
ahasenackbut this is unrelated to httpx, right?20:19
ahasenackor is httpcore failing because of the old python-click?20:20
ahasenackthe build used the new one:20:20
ahasenackGet:30 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 python3-click all 8.0.3-1 [78.3 kB]20:20
cjwatsonGunnarHj: I thought I said I wasn't going to have time to look into it, sorry20:53
cjwatsonOh I guess the fonts section question is a bit different.  I don't know how you could avoid that hack though20:54
GunnarHjcjwatson: I think we wonder if there is a way to make LP accept the hack.21:21
cjwatsonGunnarHj: Is it even really about LP though?  The discrepancy seems to be entirely contained within stuff that sbuild runs - it's just that LP notices it and complains21:21
cjwatsonGunnarHj: i.e. the .changes says non-free/fonts21:21
cjwatsonNeed to persuade that to come out right somehow, and then LP will be happy21:22
GunnarHjcjwatson: On Debian the problem does not show up, since the hack isn't run there.21:23
cjwatsonI forget which bit of the packaging toolchain it is that populates debian/files21:23
cjwatsonBut it's likely that21:23
cjwatsonI mean, you should be able to completely reproduce this outside Launchpad by doing a normal build in sbuild or whatever and then checking the generated .changes afterwards21:24
GunnarHjcjwatson: Maybe let the hack change d/control directly instead. I'll try that.21:24
cjwatsonThat's probbaly worse21:24
cjwatsonI will have a look, but not right now, need to do bedtime21:24
GunnarHjcjwatson: Ok, sweet dreams, and thanks.21:26
jbichait's not really possible to have the .dsc be different between Debian & Ubuntu if the point is to autosync22:04
jbichaI think this is a rare enough case that we might as well just have an Ubuntu diff. fonts-ubuntu doesn't get frequent updates22:06
cjwatsonjbicha: Yeah, I've tried a few things like substvars (which don't work here) and sedding debian/files (which causes dpkg-genchanges to complain about the mismatch).  sedding debian/control might work to some extent, but it's really gross and Package-List in the .dsc would unavoidably still be wrong (Launchpad doesn't care about that, but some other tools might).  I think accepting the delta is ...22:26
cjwatson... probably the only thing for it.22:26
=== genii is now known as genii-core

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!