[06:42] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[06:54] <duflu> Hi oSoMoN 
[06:59] <oSoMoN> hey duflu 
[07:08] <ricotz> hello oSoMoN duflu 
[07:09] <oSoMoN> hey ricotz 
[07:10] <duflu> Hi ricotz 
[07:18] <didrocks> good morning
[07:21] <oSoMoN> salut didrocks 
[07:23] <didrocks> salut oSoMoN 
[07:27] <jibel> hi all
[07:32] <oSoMoN> salut jibel 
[07:33] <jibel> salut oSoMoN 
[07:35] <didrocks> salut jibel
[07:42] <duflu> Hi didrocks and jibel 
[07:42] <jibel> hi duflu didrocks 
[07:50] <didrocks> hey duflu 
[08:03] <seb128> goood morning desktopers!
[08:03] <didrocks> hey seb128 
[08:08] <duflu> Hi seb128 
[08:09] <seb128> lut didrocks, hey duflu, how are you?
[08:10] <duflu> seb128, not bad, you?
[08:12] <jpnurmi> good morning
[08:21] <seb128> duflu, I'm alright thanks!
[08:21] <seb128> jpnurmi, hey!
[08:21] <didrocks> seb128: good too!
[08:22] <seb128> :)
[08:23] <duflu> Hi jpnurmi 
[08:24] <jpnurmi> hey seb128 duflu didrocks
[08:25] <didrocks> hey jpnurmi 
[08:49] <oSoMoN> salut seb128, good morning jpnurmi 
[08:49] <seb128> lut oSoMoN, en forme ?
[08:49] <jpnurmi> good morning oSoMoN
[08:50] <oSoMoN> oui, et toi?
[08:52] <seb128> nickel!
[12:06] <seb128> jbicha, hey, it seems you forgot to push your nautilus ubuntu/master changes for 42~beta?
[12:08] <seb128> jbicha, anyway I built from the tarball and the test issue is due to https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/commit/6ff4762 or https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/commit/8c31d783
[12:08] <ubottu> Commit 6ff4762 in GNOME/nautilus "meson.build: Use environment to make warnings fatal"
[12:08] <ubottu> Commit 8c31d78 in GNOME/nautilus "general: Use envar to make warnings fatal in scripts"
[12:08] <jbicha> seb128: I didn't start Ubuntu packaging for nautilus 42, just the Debian side
[12:09] <seb128> jbicha, I mean debian/master sorry
[12:10] <seb128> jbicha, thanks :)
[12:10] <jbicha> good morning :)
[12:10] <seb128> jbicha, anyway, starting manually the test it fails with G_DEBUG=fatal-warnings but works with --g-fatal-warning
[12:10] <jbicha> wow
[12:11] <seb128> so I think there is probably some other process involved and the env impact it and not the option or something
[12:11] <seb128> the warning are there in 41 already, they just don't make it abort for some reason
[12:12] <mdeslaur> seb128: is there a site with the cloud init preseeding info for the new desktop installer?
[12:13] <seb128> mdeslaur, no, that's not a topic we worked on yet
[12:14] <seb128> mdeslaur, https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-desktop-installer/issues/613 , the description has some hints if you want to play with it
[12:14] <ubottu> Issue 613 in canonical/ubuntu-desktop-installer "[autoinstall] missing packages on the live image: mdadm, multipath-tools" [Open]
[12:14] <mdeslaur> seb128: is the support available in the installer itself?
[12:14] <mdeslaur> seb128: ah, thanks
[12:14] <seb128> mdeslaur, that's ^ basically
[12:15] <seb128> mdeslaur, autoinstall is behind a experimental flag atm because we didn't do the work to make the UI smart about what was provided, like we should skip the steps which aren't required
[12:15] <seb128> mdeslaur, but otherwise in the backend it's subiquity so anything working for the server install should be working in the desktop installer at the end
[12:16] <mdeslaur> seb128: but it does work, or not? ie: can I start using it?
[12:16] <seb128> mdeslaur, I haven't tried myself, the report I mentioned suggests we should at least add some packages to the image, so probably not in the current state
[12:17] <seb128> mdeslaur, also we postponed the new installer by default to post LTS
[12:17] <mdeslaur> oh! ok, that solves my issue then
[12:18] <mdeslaur> I was afraid the LTS was coming out with the new installer but with broken cloud-init preseeding support
[12:18] <mdeslaur> seb128: thanks!
[12:18] <seb128> mdeslaur, np!
[14:02] <jbicha> seb128: do you want to try removing gjs from i386 instead?
[14:02] <seb128> jbicha, there is no rdepends?
[14:03] <seb128> jbicha, are we trying to solve a real issue at this point?
[14:03] <jbicha> I don't know how to check that thoroughly
[14:03] <jbicha> gjs won't migrate to jammy because it doesn't build on i386 (like it used to) because mozjs91 wasn't marked to be built on i386
[14:07] <seb128> is that the only migration blocker at this point? and do we want it to migrate before the shell stack is uploaded?
[14:08] <seb128> I would think having it blocked at this point is a feature :)
[14:08] <jbicha> I'm running jammy's gnome-shell 42 with the new gjs now and it seems ok
[14:09] <jbicha> mozjs91 needs a bug subscriber & it'll need promotion to main
[14:09] <seb128> Trevinho, ^ ack?
[14:09] <jbicha> sorry gnome-shell 41 with new gjs
[14:09] <seb128> let's wait for Marco, I'm unsure we should mix series in release pocket
[14:09] <Trevinho> seb128: it's fine to migrate, but..
[14:09] <seb128> I would personally wait for the shell update to unblock it
[14:10] <Trevinho> I think the dock *may* have an issue (noticed later), but I think it's only triggered by newest shell code
[14:11] <Trevinho> it's not a big deal though, we can promote gjs as it is... it's not breaking any previous feature, unless somehting else needs further code
[14:11] <Trevinho> like new syntax supported by mozjs91
[14:12] <Trevinho> seb128: we need to migrate adw to main as well though... Shell depends on it now (extensions side)
[14:12] <Trevinho> and again we can't just ignore it as otherwise most of 3rd party extensions that will now use it in preferences won't work
[14:13] <jbicha> newest adwaita is blocked on the gtk4/armhf autopkgtest issue
[14:24] <seb128> Trevinho, libadwaita you mean?
[14:24] <Trevinho> yes
[14:24] <Trevinho> adw is the gir name :-D
[14:24] <seb128> we need a MIR
[14:25] <seb128> I will handle it, don't worry about that to upload to proposed
[14:25] <Trevinho> yeah.... can you handle the paperwork? :P
[14:25] <seb128> sure
[14:25] <Trevinho> 😘
[14:26] <seb128> 😊
[14:30] <seb128> Trevinho, oh, but that's not in the archive nor in debian yet?
[14:31] <jbicha> libadwaita-1
[14:31] <seb128> jbicha, ah, thanks ... why the -1?
[14:32] <jbicha> it matches the library series but I didn't package it either 😉
[14:32] <seb128> ack
[14:33] <jbicha> matches libhandy-1 (there was an older libhandy)
[14:47] <Trevinho> seb128: I'm not uploading newer libfprint either as libusb is still broken, causing tests failures... But I think that's not a problem post ff (it's a point release)
[14:52] <Trevinho> seb128: I'm not uploading newer libfprint either as libusb is still broken, causing tests failures... But I think that's not a problem post ff (it's a point release)
[14:52] <seb128> Trevinho, right
[16:33] <sil2100> Hello desktoppers! Does anyone have any 20.04 certified hardware to test the 20.04.4 images on it?
[16:34] <sil2100> I tested the nvidia bits on my testing Dell, but it's only 18.04 certified so I don't get any OEM packages - I'd be interested to see if certified hardware still works as expected
[16:35] <oSoMoN> sorry, I can't help there
[16:51] <KGB-0> totem signed tags e0eb849 Jeremy Bicha upstream/41_alpha_20220222 * Upstream version 41~alpha~20220222 * https://deb.li/3WXT2
[16:51] <KGB-0> totem upstream/latest 8780046 Jeremy Bicha (145 files in 46 dirs) * New upstream version 41~alpha~20220222 * https://deb.li/3a2Oh
[16:51] <KGB-0> totem pristine-tar da161be Jeremy Bicha totem_41~alpha~20220222.orig.tar.xz.delta totem_41~alpha~20220222.orig.tar.xz.id * pristine-tar data for totem_41~alpha~20220222.orig.tar.xz * https://deb.li/7FuM
[17:03] <KGB-0> totem signed tags ec9424d Jeremy Bicha ubuntu/41_alpha_20220222-1ubuntu1 * totem Debian release 41~alpha~20220222-1ubuntu1 * https://deb.li/pFne
[17:03] <KGB-0> totem ubuntu/master a35b72e Jeremy Bicha * pushed 15 commits (first 5 follow) * https://deb.li/3QBd0
[17:03] <KGB-0> totem ubuntu/master 20c0d1f Simon McVittie debian/patches/debian/Don-t-run-pylint-at-build-time.patch * Update patch metadata * https://deb.li/1b7A
[17:03] <KGB-0> totem ubuntu/master dc5b7d7 Simon McVittie debian/patches/ series build-Remove-unused-i18n.merge_file-name.patch * Add patch from upstream to fix FTBFS with Meson 0.61 * https://deb.li/3VXBi
[17:03] <KGB-0> totem ubuntu/master 645b67a Simon McVittie debian/changelog * Release to unstable * https://deb.li/DnUv
[17:03] <KGB-0> totem ubuntu/master 8780046 Jeremy Bicha (145 files in 46 dirs) * New upstream version 41~alpha~20220222 * https://deb.li/3a2Oh
[17:03] <KGB-0> totem ubuntu/master aefa083 Jeremy Bicha (145 files in 46 dirs) * Update upstream source from tag 'upstream/41_alpha_20220222' * https://deb.li/r2dn
[22:36] <KGB-0> gnome-shell-extensions tags 36bd911 Marco Trevisan upstream/42_beta * Upstream version 42~beta * https://deb.li/3vdHV
[22:36] <KGB-0> file-roller signed tags 8c6a917 Jeremy Bicha upstream/3.41.90 * Upstream version 3.41.90 * https://deb.li/oGuc
[22:36] <KGB-0> file-roller upstream/latest 5ad76c6 Jeremy Bicha * pushed 59 commits (first 5 follow) * https://deb.li/3bGVv
[22:36] <KGB-0> file-roller upstream/latest db9e3ea Balázs Úr help/hu/hu.po * Update Hungarian translation * https://deb.li/3gddz
[22:36] <KGB-0> file-roller upstream/latest b7ab90d Nathan Follens po/nl.po * Update Dutch translation * https://deb.li/ixTgs
[22:37] <KGB-0> file-roller upstream/latest 30e4cc3 Tim Sabsch help/de/de.po * Update German translation * https://deb.li/khHN
[22:37] <KGB-0> file-roller upstream/latest 9989931 Rafael Fontenelle help/pt_BR/pt_BR.po * Update Brazilian Portuguese translation * https://deb.li/3WGsx
[22:37] <KGB-0> file-roller upstream/latest 6b6dbc4 Марко Костић po/sr.po * Update Serbian translation * https://deb.li/O9UE
[22:37] <KGB-0> file-roller pristine-tar f576b97 Jeremy Bicha file-roller_3.41.90.orig.tar.xz.delta file-roller_3.41.90.orig.tar.xz.id * pristine-tar data for file-roller_3.41.90.orig.tar.xz * https://deb.li/edzg