[00:00] vorlon: if you're into that level of moving things around, should i just upload https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/pull/289 ? [00:00] Pull 289 in ubuntu/adsys "internal/testutils: invoke smbd with option accepted by 4.15+" [Open] [00:01] mwhudson: yeeeees [00:01] I mean, I haven't looked at what that does, but yes, samba+sssd needs sorting [00:01] although possibly not with my current changelog entry, which is " * argh" [00:01] but all of perl, python3, ocaml are entangled right now, so yes it's time to start using a hatchet [00:01] vorlon: ack [00:02] Finished 7 hours ago (took 1 day, 21 hours, 30 minutes, 16.7 seconds) [00:02] yeah maybe I don't care about getting sagemath fixed on armhf [00:05] * mwhudson stops himself before uploading a native package with debian/patches again [00:12] backuppc looks a bit worrying [00:12] checksum errors with new samba? [00:13] ah https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/1962166 [00:15] which is linked from excuses, silly me [00:17] vorlon: python3.10 looks reasonably close actually? [00:18] although that backuppc thing is not so great [00:20] yeah ok i guess i'm learning about backuppc today [00:20] vorlon: unless you're looking at that already? [00:21] lunch first though [01:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-github-containers-buildah (impish-proposed/universe) [1.21.3+ds1-1ubuntu1 => 1.21.3+ds1-1ubuntu1.1] (no packageset) [02:07] oh wait sergiodj had a mp with a workaround [04:45] mwhudson: yes; I'll push it later today [04:45] s/push/upload [07:29] vorlon: urgh - apologies let me checkandfix [07:34] vorlon: fixed - I'll upload again shortly [08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-discover (impish-proposed/universe) [5.22.5-0ubuntu1 => 5.22.5-0ubuntu1.1] (kubuntu) [09:11] amurray: leave it, it's working as intended [09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted csound [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1:6.17.0~dfsg-3] [09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted csound [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [1:6.17.0~dfsg-3] [09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted csound [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [1:6.17.0~dfsg-3] [09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted csound [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [1:6.17.0~dfsg-3] [09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted csound [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [1:6.17.0~dfsg-3] [09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted csound [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [1:6.17.0~dfsg-3] [09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x264 [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2:0.163.3060+git5db6aa6-2] [09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x264 [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [2:0.163.3060+git5db6aa6-2] [09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x264 [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [2:0.163.3060+git5db6aa6-2] [09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x264 [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [2:0.163.3060+git5db6aa6-2] [09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x264 [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [2:0.163.3060+git5db6aa6-2] [09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x264 [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [2:0.163.3060+git5db6aa6-2] [09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x264 [i386] (jammy-proposed) [2:0.163.3060+git5db6aa6-2] [10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (focal-proposed/main) [4.2-1ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 4.3-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [10:55] laney: ack [11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: keyutils (impish-proposed/main) [1.6.1-2ubuntu1 => 1.6.1-2ubuntu2.1] (core, i386-whitelist) [11:16] mwhudson: backuppc uploaded [11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: keyutils (focal-proposed/main) [1.6-6ubuntu1 => 1.6-6ubuntu1.1] (core, i386-whitelist) [11:52] ubuntu-archive: LP: #1962463 [11:52] Launchpad bug 1962463 in kubuntu-driver-manager (Ubuntu) "Please remove from Jammy archive" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1962463 [11:52] thanks! [12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (bionic-proposed/main) [4.1-1ubuntu0.18.04.3 => 4.3-1ubuntu0.18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [12:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [source] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1] [12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [amd64] (impish-proposed/main) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1] (core) [12:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [ppc64el] (impish-proposed/main) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1] (core) [12:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [s390x] (impish-proposed/main) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1] (core) [12:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [arm64] (impish-proposed/main) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1] (core) [12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd-signed [source] (impish-proposed) [1.42~ubuntu21.10.2] [12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [armhf] (impish-proposed/main) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1] (core) [13:07] Hi all. Any chance that the Ubuntu Budgie packageset rights be refreshed please? We are keen to ensure we can offer support for our budgie-control-center package that's in ours seeds for jammy but not yet in our packageset. TIA [13:19] fossfreedom: I think that's something for the dmb [13:23] fossfreedom: for a quick solution I just added budgie-control-center to the ubuntu-budgie packageset in Jammy for you. To get the whole thing properly regenerated, could you please send an email to devel-permissions@? [13:24] The automated packageset generation is a mess and I think the person who was previously looking at it recently resigned from the DMB so we'll need to figure out how to sort this properly again I think. [13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted knewstuff [source] (impish-proposed) [5.86.0-0ubuntu3.1] [13:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-discover [source] (impish-proposed) [5.22.5-0ubuntu1.1] [13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added budgie-control-center to ubuntu-budgie in jammy [13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [riscv64] (impish-proposed/main) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1] (core) [14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [source] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1] [14:11] rbasak: Are there plans to backfill that open position in the DMB? If so how quickly will that happen? [14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1] (core) [14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1] (core) [14:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1] (core) [14:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1] (core) [14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1] (core) [14:26] bdmurray: yes we will run an election ASAP now, and another in May. I'm not sure who is supposed to be sending out a call for nominations. I guess that'll happen at the next meeting. Though you've prompted me now so I'll send email about it now - thanks. [14:32] rbasak: Thanks, it'd be good to get that position filled. [14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: simplestreams (focal-backports/main) [0.1.0-30-g3cc8988a-0ubuntu1.20.04.1 => 0.1.0-48-gb936edd4-0ubuntu1~bpo20.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) [15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [riscv64] (focal-proposed/main) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1] (core) [15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.27.1ubuntu7] [15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libjcat (impish-proposed/main) [0.1.3-2build1 => 0.1.4-ubuntu1~21.10.1] (core) [15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libjcat [source] (impish-proposed) [0.1.4-ubuntu1~21.10.1] [15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: manila (impish-proposed/universe) [1:13.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:13.0.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack) [15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libjcat (impish-proposed/main) [0.1.3-2build1 => 0.1.4-0ubuntu0.21.10.1] (core) [15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libjcat [source] (impish-proposed) [0.1.4-ubuntu1~21.10.1] [15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libjcat [source] (impish-proposed) [0.1.4-0ubuntu0.21.10.1] [15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libjcat (focal-proposed/main) [0.1.3-2~ubuntu20.04.1 => 0.1.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset) [15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-tokio-native-tls [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset) [15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-tokio-native-tls [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset) [15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libjcat [source] (focal-proposed) [0.1.4-ubuntu1~20.04.1] [15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-tokio-native-tls [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset) [15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-tokio-native-tls [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset) [15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-tokio-native-tls [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset) [15:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpac [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.0.0+dfsg1-2] (i386-whitelist) [15:50] Heads up: new binaries on gpac, this fixes a large number of CVEs. [15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libjcat [source] (focal-proposed) [0.1.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] [15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpac [i386] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.0.0+dfsg1-2] (i386-whitelist) [15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpac [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.0.0+dfsg1-2] (i386-whitelist) [15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpac [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.0.0+dfsg1-2] (i386-whitelist) [15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpac [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.0+dfsg1-2] [15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpac [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.0+dfsg1-2] [15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-tokio-native-tls [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.3.0-1] [15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-tokio-native-tls [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [0.3.0-1] [15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-tokio-native-tls [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [0.3.0-1] [15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpac [i386] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.0+dfsg1-2] [15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-tokio-native-tls [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [0.3.0-1] [15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpac [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.0+dfsg1-2] [15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-tokio-native-tls [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [0.3.0-1] [15:52] Eickmeyer: . [15:53] cjwatson: ? [15:53] Eickmeyer: meaning "done" [15:54] cjwatson: Ah! Thanks. Saw it wasn't in the queue and was like, "What the..." but you acted faster than my browser could load. :) [15:54] syncs from Debian are largely scripted, usually don't need prodding [15:54] Ah, fair. [15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpac [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.0.0+dfsg1-2] (i386-whitelist) [15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpac [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.0+dfsg1-2] [16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpac [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.0.0+dfsg1-2] (i386-whitelist) [16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpac [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.0+dfsg1-2] [16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (impish-proposed/universe) [1:4.0.10-0ubuntu5 => 1:4.0.12-0ubuntu1~21.10.1] (ubuntu-server) [16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sosreport [source] (focal-proposed) [4.3-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] [16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (focal-proposed) [4.3-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] [16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.3-1ubuntu0.18.04.1] [17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-sequoia-openpgp [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-6] (no packageset) [17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-sequoia-openpgp [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-6] (no packageset) [17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-sequoia-openpgp [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-6] (no packageset) [17:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-sequoia-openpgp [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-6] (no packageset) [17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-sequoia-openpgp [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-6] (no packageset) [18:07] hello SRU team, if anyone has cycles to review the impish upload for manila it would help us unblock some things. Thanks! [18:15] also if we could get bug 1959712 release for focal that would be very helpful [18:15] Bug 1959712 in cinder (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] Add iSCSI support to HPE 3PAR driver for Primera 4.2 and higher" [Wishlist, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1959712 [19:14] sergiodj: thanks [20:10] sergiodj: hi, I don't see that samba is any better shape for migration now than it was yesterday; what was the workaround you were pushing? (cc: mwhudson) [20:10] oh, I see you said it was backuppc that was uploaded; retriggering tests then [20:12] vorlon: you would be the third person to retrigger those tests :) [20:12] @ubuntu-archive - some php8.1 binaries need dropped to universe, when you get a chance (LP: #1962491) [20:12] vorlon: afaict the only blocker is whatever is going on with adsys [20:13] (build failure on ppc64el, still regressions on armhf or something?) [20:14] mwhudson: good thing the queue knows these days how to merge duplicate queue requests (but not if the tests finished before being retriggered :) [20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-sequoia-openpgp [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.7.0-6] [20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-sequoia-openpgp [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [1.7.0-6] [20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-sequoia-openpgp [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [1.7.0-6] [20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-sequoia-openpgp [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [1.7.0-6] [20:14] any reason not to remove adsys? [20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-sequoia-openpgp [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [1.7.0-6] [20:15] vorlon: hmm [20:15] does ubiquity not depend on it? [20:15] it's in universe and has no revdeps [20:15] huh i was sure it was in main [20:15] sssd is [20:15] then no, deleting it to let the transition go through makes sense i think [20:16] removing [20:16] i can still try to figure out the build failure today at least [20:16] * vorlon nods [20:24] vorlon: has britney gotten a bit slow again? [20:25] well of course debugging adsys/ppc64el would be easier if this vm i got in a brown paper bag wasn't power8 [20:30] mwhudson: hadn't looked at its speed, but I was certainly starting to suspect [20:32] mwhudson: yeah there are no P9 VMs available in Canonistack yet. >_< [20:32] (even if you could launch them) [20:33] mwhudson: so it looks like britney runs are currently around an hour and a half [20:33] and they are succeeding [20:34] should they be an hour and a half? no. Am I going to dig into it right now? also no [20:36] fair [20:36] and the current run started at 20:03 so looks promising for fixed backuppc being picked up. Still need another run for adsys removal though [20:37] so er like 2-2.5 hrs to wait [20:56] though I suppose I could just kill the current run since it won't do anything useful [20:56] (done) [21:29] what is the chance i can find something on nbs that is not entangled in python/perl/etc [21:29] before britney migrates everything [21:32] ararargh i find something else and it's a ppc64el build failure [21:33] i guess i can try disabling -O3 in a ppa build just to feel like i'm doing something [21:44] hmm why does ntpsec still depend on libssl1.1 [21:50] mwhudson@anduril:~/src/pkg/ntpsec-1.2.1+dfsg1$ grep ssl1.1 --before 1 debian/control [21:50] Depends: adduser, [21:50] libssl1.1 (>= 1.1.1b), [21:50] yeah maybe that's why [21:51] snort [22:20] vorlon: heh adsys migrated despite the ppc64el build failure now [22:32] vorlon: looks like python3-defaults didn't migrate? :( [22:33] mwhudson: oh right, because it's no longer a missing build once the binaries in the release pocket are gone :P [22:35] because of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poliastro/0.16.2-1/+build/23161594 i.e. numba [22:36] Implicit dependency: astropy poliastro (not considered) [22:36] yes, because obviously there is an implicit dependency on a package NOT BUILT AT ALL IN PROPOSED