=== genii is now known as genii-core [01:16] Is it my imagination, or did a recent update in the 20.04 desktop packages adjust something in the default themes (or switch the default theme), so that the majority of backgrounds are a dirty grey/off-white colour? My whole desktop has looked dim since my last reboot. [03:14] hi [03:14] i have noticed freeipa-client and nfs-common conflict in jammy [03:14] this breaks freeipa automount, for example [03:15] is this a known regression? [03:19] https://pastebin.com/8Nycv2nT [03:19] has the details === seb129 is now known as seb128 [13:10] seb128, and here I thought there was a new version of you out.. when will seb129 be ready? :) [13:13] Beret, :-) [13:39] beret! === genii-core is now known as genii [15:51] Moderation for ubuntu-devel-announce@ please [15:52] It appears I now moderate ubuntu-announce@ but not ubuntu-devel-announce@ [16:04] rbasak: . [16:05] Thanks! [16:05] Hmm, I just approved it too. ;-) [16:05] listadmin fight [17:11] ahasenack, hey there my friend, how goes? [17:11] ahasenack, any good mushroom risotto lately? :) [18:47] Beret: hi [18:47] unfortunately no [18:47] but working on it [19:15] hi, about memtest86+ someone suggested to request an SRU for focal: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/1876157/comments/34 is good and will be accepted or is better a focal-backports? thanks for any reply and sorry for my bad english [19:16] Launchpad bug 1876157 in memtest86+ (Baltix) "Memtest86+ in Ubuntu 20.04 doesn't work, switch to Coreboot branch or package new release v5.31b is available since 12/04/2020" [Medium, Triaged] [19:19] Fantu: an SRU would be fine, but if a massive update is being proposed on the basis that it's broken on Focal, it really needs to be broken for *all* use cases. For example not just for those on some particular hardware. Otherwise, it needs to be justified on its own merits, rather than just an "it's broken". [19:20] Fantu: so I would start by explaining in the bug exactly who it is broken for, and why. [19:21] rbasak thanks for reply, is not broken in all cases but in major of hardware where I tested it if I remember good [19:24] on older version there are many bugs, some for recent hardware missed support, some for newer gcc and some others, is difficult to explain and I don't wont waste big amount to time like what I did on some nemo and cinnamon SRU for small fixes for crash cases :( [19:28] memtest86 is broken for UEFI machines, yes, but the prop version on the memtest site cannot be included, afaik [19:32] I spoke about memtest86+, not memtest86 [19:44] I actually needed that code for shuffling m3u files which needs shuffling pairs of lines [19:44] sorry, mispaste [19:44] meant to say, anyone else seeing Oops trying to load https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/jammy-jellyfish-release-schedule/23906 ? [19:47] bryceh: I see the oops [19:48] Fantu: OK, thanks. It's much harder to "just update to a new major version" in a stable release because we have to think about existing users who aren't broken, and ensure we don't break them. [19:48] Fantu: so maybe the backports pocket would be better [19:49] rbasak thanks for reply, I open for BPO: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/1962614 [19:49] Launchpad bug 1962614 in memtest86+ (Ubuntu) "[BPO] memtest86+/5.31b+dfsg-4 from Jammy to Focal" [Undecided, New] === mfo_ is now known as mfo === paride1 is now known as paride === nibbon_5 is now known as nibbon_ === vogelfrei7 is now known as vogelfrei === genii is now known as genii-core