[01:16] <blahdeblah> Is it my imagination, or did a recent update in the 20.04 desktop packages adjust something in the default themes (or switch the default theme), so that the majority of backgrounds are a dirty grey/off-white colour?  My whole desktop has looked dim since my last reboot.
[03:14] <vogelfrei> hi
[03:14] <vogelfrei> i have noticed freeipa-client and nfs-common conflict in jammy
[03:14] <vogelfrei> this breaks freeipa automount, for example
[03:15] <vogelfrei> is this a known regression?
[03:19] <vogelfrei> https://pastebin.com/8Nycv2nT
[03:19] <vogelfrei> has the details
[13:10] <Beret> seb128, and here I thought there was a new version of you out.. when will seb129 be ready? :)
[13:13] <seb128> Beret, :-)
[13:39] <ahasenack> beret!
[15:51] <rbasak> Moderation for ubuntu-devel-announce@ please
[15:52] <rbasak> It appears I now moderate ubuntu-announce@ but not ubuntu-devel-announce@
[16:04] <cjwatson> rbasak: .
[16:05] <rbasak> Thanks!
[16:05] <bdmurray> Hmm, I just approved it too. ;-)
[16:05] <cjwatson> listadmin fight
[17:11] <Beret> ahasenack, hey there my friend, how goes?
[17:11] <Beret> ahasenack, any good mushroom risotto lately? :)
[18:47] <ahasenack> Beret: hi
[18:47] <ahasenack> unfortunately no
[18:47] <ahasenack> but working on it
[19:15] <Fantu> hi, about memtest86+ someone suggested to request an SRU for focal: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/1876157/comments/34 is good and will be accepted or is better a focal-backports? thanks for any reply and sorry for my bad english
[19:19] <rbasak> Fantu: an SRU would be fine, but if a massive update is being proposed on the basis that it's broken on Focal, it really needs to be broken for *all* use cases. For example not just for those on some particular hardware. Otherwise, it needs to be justified on its own merits, rather than just an "it's broken".
[19:20] <rbasak> Fantu: so I would start by explaining in the bug exactly who it is broken for, and why.
[19:21] <Fantu> rbasak thanks for reply, is not broken in all cases but in major of hardware where I tested it if I remember good
[19:24] <Fantu> on older version there are many bugs, some for recent hardware missed support, some for newer gcc and some others, is difficult to explain and I don't wont waste big amount to time like what I did on some nemo and cinnamon SRU for small fixes for crash cases :(
[19:28] <oerheks> memtest86 is broken for UEFI machines, yes, but the prop version on the memtest site cannot be included, afaik
[19:32] <Fantu> I spoke about memtest86+, not memtest86
[19:44] <bryceh> I actually needed that code for shuffling m3u files which needs shuffling pairs of lines
[19:44] <bryceh> sorry, mispaste
[19:44] <bryceh> meant to say, anyone else seeing Oops trying to load https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/jammy-jellyfish-release-schedule/23906 ?
[19:47] <rbasak> bryceh: I see the oops
[19:48] <rbasak> Fantu: OK, thanks. It's much harder to "just update to a new major version" in a stable release because we have to think about existing users who aren't broken, and ensure we don't break them.
[19:48] <rbasak> Fantu: so maybe the backports pocket would be better
[19:49] <Fantu> rbasak thanks for reply, I open for BPO: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/1962614