| mwhudson | well https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sblim-sfcb/1.4.9-0ubuntu6/+build/22604622 just looks completely broken | 00:02 |
|---|---|---|
| Eickmeyer | mwhudson: RE: numba, looks like a new version is available and just not in sid yet. Should we, idk, just grab the source and JFDI? | 00:09 |
| mwhudson | Eickmeyer: does it support 3.10 yet? | 00:09 |
| Eickmeyer | Yes, that was added with 0.55.0, it's at 0.55.1 now. | 00:09 |
| Eickmeyer | https://github.com/numba/numba/releases | 00:11 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: wtf https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#sssd adsys/0.8 isn't a thing any more? | 00:11 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: maybe you should delete adsys again | 00:13 |
| Eickmeyer | Salsa down for anybody else? I'm getting a big fat 403 for no good reason. | 00:13 |
| cjwatson | https://lists.debian.org/debian-infrastructure-announce/2022/02/msg00000.html | 00:14 |
| Eickmeyer | Ahhhhhh yes, thanks, cjwatson. | 00:14 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: I'm retrying adsys autopkgtest with --all-proposed, which given that the test passed w/ -proposed samba, that might do the trick and with less effort than deleting | 01:36 |
| vorlon | (since I would need not only to delete but also block) | 01:36 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: ok | 01:36 |
| mwhudson | oh right we want sssd and samba both in triggers | 01:37 |
| mwhudson | ahasenack did one and i did the other | 01:37 |
| * mwhudson afk for a bit | 01:38 | |
| vorlon | oh look. I can't remove llvm-9 because pocl because llvm-11 because ocaml because plplot because python. | 01:44 |
| sarnold | pythonshmython. who needs it. | 01:46 |
| vorlon | plplot. plplot does. | 01:46 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: so adsys/armhf still failed with --all-proposed https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy/jammy/armhf/a/adsys/20220301_014840_f08f8@/log.gz | 01:50 |
| vorlon | adsys demoted to proposed; force-skiptest added for sssd (so we don't have to wait for the archive publisher); and britney restarted again | 02:21 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: bla | 02:27 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: do you want a hint to stop adsys migrating again? | 02:28 |
| Eickmeyer | mwhudson, vorlon: I'm build testing numba in my ppa. It should solve a problem or two with some migration. Want it? | 02:29 |
| mwhudson | Eickmeyer: not right now i think | 02:29 |
| Eickmeyer | mwhudson: Ok. Thought I'd ask as I don't want to complicate matters. | 02:30 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: I added a block-proposed bug | 02:31 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: ah ha | 02:31 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer: numba can't make anything worse, everything that uses it is in proposed only right now | 02:32 |
| Eickmeyer | vorlon, mwhudson: It completely ftbfs anyhow, so much for being 3.10 ready. | 02:34 |
| Eickmeyer | And yes, it was against proposed. | 02:35 |
| Eickmeyer | It's complaining about tbb being too old. | 02:42 |
| * Eickmeyer finds himself in dependency hell | 02:42 | |
| mwhudson | ah that might need a sync maybe? | 02:43 |
| mwhudson | there was something on debian-python about that | 02:43 |
| Eickmeyer | Nope, sid's is too old too. | 02:43 |
| Eickmeyer | Needs 2021 update or better, and 2020 is in sid. | 02:44 |
| mwhudson | ah the one in experimental maybe? | 02:44 |
| Eickmeyer | I don't see one in experimental? | 02:45 |
| mwhudson | oh wait that's https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=onetbb&suite=experimental | 02:45 |
| mwhudson | is that the same thing at all? | 02:45 |
| Eickmeyer | It should be, but that means the package name changed. | 02:45 |
| mwhudson | ah yes http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/o/onetbb/onetbb_2021.5.0-7_changelog | 02:46 |
| Eickmeyer | Aha!@ | 02:46 |
| Eickmeyer | I'll syncpackage that. | 02:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: onetbb (jammy-proposed/primary) [2021.5.0-7] | 02:48 | |
| Eickmeyer | Means we should probably dummy package tbb -> onetbb | 02:49 |
| OldManWinter | Dang, wireguard was promoted, so I can no longer upload. I guess others are watching more closely anyway though, and can take care of it. | 02:57 |
| mwhudson | Eickmeyer: i think the binary packages are the same | 03:01 |
| mwhudson | well up to SONAME | 03:01 |
| Eickmeyer | mwhudson: Yeah, in that case do we remove the old tbb in favor of onetbb from the archive? | 03:01 |
| mwhudson | Eickmeyer: i think that would be the usual way, yes | 03:33 |
| Eickmeyer | mwhudson: Kinda thought so. | 03:33 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: i think britney is trolling us again | 03:37 |
| mwhudson | https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#source-highlight | 03:37 |
| mwhudson | why is source-highlight in proposed in main? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/source-highlight | 03:38 |
| mwhudson | ubuntu-archive: which component should source-hightlight be in? | 03:40 |
| sarnold | mwhudson: check gdb | 03:45 |
| mwhudson | sarnold: que? | 03:47 |
| mwhudson | oh i see | 03:48 |
| mwhudson | why does reverse-depends not see that? | 03:48 |
| sarnold | usually because I forget the src: thingy :) | 03:49 |
| mwhudson | oh i see | 03:49 |
| mwhudson | gdb has dropped the dep now | 03:49 |
| mwhudson | so i think source-highlight can be dropped to universe now too | 03:49 |
| sarnold | does something magically do that when unseeded packages are no longer required by seeded packages? | 03:53 |
| mwhudson | sarnold: no, members of ~ubuntu-archive do that after reading the component-mismatches report | 04:15 |
| mwhudson | it's on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html | 04:16 |
| mwhudson | RAOF: hi | 04:19 |
| mwhudson | ? | 04:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1] | 08:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1] | 08:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [riscv64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1] | 08:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1] | 08:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1] | 08:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1] | 08:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [amd64] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1] | 08:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [armhf] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1] | 08:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [riscv64] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1] | 08:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [arm64] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1] | 08:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [s390x] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1] | 08:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1] | 08:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-caesar-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 08:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-caesar-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) | 08:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-weedle-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 08:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-weedle-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) | 08:21 | |
| tjaalton | please allow libxcvt on i386, it's blocking xorg-server | 08:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-cubone-rkl-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 08:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-cubone-rkl-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) | 08:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-beric-amd-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 08:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-beric-amd-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) | 08:34 | |
| seb128 | mwhudson, vorlon, the adsys release remove is a bit rude, could you at least talk to us about finding solution before removing a package that we own? | 08:58 |
| mwhudson | seb128: we'll put it back as soon as the python transition is done, which was hoped to be several hours ago | 08:59 |
| seb128 | mwhudson, I don't understand why that was even needed, the bug mention autopkgtest failures, can't we just hint ignore those? | 09:01 |
| ricotz | mwhudson, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#source-highlight still blocks python | 09:01 |
| mwhudson | ricotz: we need an aa | 09:02 |
| ricotz | hello seb128 mwhudson | 09:02 |
| mwhudson | seb128: could you move source-highlight in jammy-proposed to universe? | 09:02 |
| mwhudson | (it's on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html) | 09:03 |
| seb128 | mwhudson, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/source-highlight suggests it's already in universe, also that source was in main in impish so probably is needed there? | 09:04 |
| mwhudson | seb128: it used to be a dependency of gdb but isn't any longer | 09:04 |
| mwhudson | so i think demotion is appropriate | 09:04 |
| mwhudson | or its deps need to be promoted again but the current situation is wrong | 09:05 |
| seb128 | mwhudson, demoted | 09:14 |
| mwhudson | seb128: thank you | 09:14 |
| doko | mwhudson: hmm, why did gdb drop source-highlight? | 09:32 |
| mwhudson | doko: i certainly have no idea | 09:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ceph [amd64] (jammy-proposed/main) [17.1.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server) | 10:23 | |
| RikMills | the just uploaded ceph seems to have blocked python3-defaults migration? ^^ | 10:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-base1.0 (focal-proposed/main) [1.16.2-4ubuntu0.1 => 1.16.3-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 10:58 | |
| ricotz | so close :( | 10:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-drogo-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 11:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-drogo-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) | 11:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-beric-amd-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 11:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-drogo-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 11:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-caesar-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 11:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-cubone-rkl-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 11:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-weedle-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 11:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ceph [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [17.1.0-0ubuntu1] | 11:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted onetbb [sync] (jammy-proposed) [2021.5.0-7] | 11:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-good1.0 (focal-proposed/main) [1.16.2-1ubuntu2.1 => 1.16.3-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 11:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: onetbb [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2021.5.0-7] (no packageset) | 11:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted onetbb [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2021.5.0-7] | 11:31 | |
| ahasenack | what's the eta on python3-defaults migrating, does anybody know? | 12:24 |
| ahasenack | I think this is the longest python migration I have ever seen | 12:24 |
| doko | still faster than ruby-defaults ;p v*rlon was working on that, but it's now delayed by a new ceph upload | 12:28 |
| ahasenack | oh yeah, ruby is the champion | 12:29 |
| ahasenack | I fear the upcoming bug reports, when these packages finally hit the release pocket | 12:30 |
| ahasenack | brace for impact | 12:30 |
| ahasenack | why is adsys still in excuses, since it hit the release pocket yesterday? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#adsys | 12:32 |
| ahasenack | and with no "prior version" listed | 12:32 |
| ahasenack | I guess many things beyond my understanding are entangled right now :) | 12:33 |
| ahasenack | oh, it moved back to proposed overnight | 12:34 |
| ricotz | just a reminder :) - <tjaalton> please allow libxcvt on i386, it's blocking xorg-server | 12:39 |
| RikMills | ahasenack: previous ceth upload took 36 hrs to build on riscv64, so I wouldn't bet on any time soon if that stays in proposed | 12:47 |
| seb128 | ricotz, tjaalton: libxcvt handled | 12:48 |
| ricotz | seb128, great, thanks | 12:58 |
| coreycb | ginggs: it looks like there was some progress on onetbb, have you been keeping tabs on it? | 13:00 |
| tjaalton | thanks! | 13:03 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libnfsidmap from i386-whitelist in jammy | 13:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added fonts-nanum to i386-whitelist in jammy | 13:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added fonts-open-sans to i386-whitelist in jammy | 13:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gi-docgen to i386-whitelist in jammy | 13:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added highlight.js to i386-whitelist in jammy | 13:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libxcvt to i386-whitelist in jammy | 13:06 | |
| === seb129 is now known as seb128 | ||
| ginggs | coreycb: there was an update to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000336#101 a week ago | 13:17 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 1000336 in src:numba "numba: FTBFS with Python 3.10" [Serious, Open] | 13:17 |
| ginggs | I think there about 8 build failures in onetbb's reverse-build-dependencies | 13:19 |
| ahasenack | RikMills: I thought riscv64 was risc-free | 13:19 |
| ahasenack | i.e., wouldn't block anything | 13:20 |
| RikMills | ahasenack: I think that is still the case for autopkgtests and build time tests, but not for missing builds | 13:21 |
| RikMills | but I could be mistaken | 13:21 |
| ahasenack | can't wait for the rush to fix bugs once these transitions land | 13:22 |
| ahasenack | that will be the real ff date in practice | 13:22 |
| RikMills | ahasenack: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#netdata | 13:23 |
| RikMills | example on something blocked on riscv64 | 13:23 |
| RikMills | *of something | 13:23 |
| coreycb | ginggs: seems to be progressing, thanks | 13:55 |
| bdmurray | ceph is a new upstream version after Feature Freeze? | 13:56 |
| seb128 | bdmurray, the proposed version was already a git snapshot | 13:57 |
| seb128 | which was uploaded before feature freeze | 13:57 |
| bdmurray | seb128: ah okay, I didn't look at the full publishing history | 13:58 |
| * ahasenack used the same trick with freeradius | 14:08 | |
| ahasenack | I'm using a git snapshot of 3.0.26 | 14:09 |
| ricotz | tjaalton, you can retry it now https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/2:21.1.3-2ubuntu1/+build/23194148 | 14:22 |
| tjaalton | already tried once | 14:24 |
| ricotz | tjaalton, but you didn't wait for the i386 build to be published ;) | 14:25 |
| tjaalton | right | 14:28 |
| ricotz | looks good now | 14:28 |
| ricotz | tjaalton, despite the build failure | 14:29 |
| vorlon | jamespage: I'm backing ceph out of -proposed; this resets the entire python+perl+ocaml transition to have it there right now, and it takes days to build on riscv64. We can copy it back when the transition is done | 15:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (impish-proposed/main) [4:20.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 4:20.1.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 15:41 | |
| Eickmeyer | ginggs: onetbb built just fine (sans riscv64), and I've got numba test-building in my PPA wth proposed enabled. | 15:42 |
| jamespage | vorlon: apologies and +1 | 15:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: heat (impish-proposed/main) [1:17.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:17.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 15:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer1.0 (focal-proposed/main) [1.16.2-2 => 1.16.3-0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 16:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceilometer (impish-proposed/main) [2:17.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:17.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 16:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (impish-backports/universe) [261-1~bpo21.10.1 => 264-1~bpo21.10.1] (no packageset) | 16:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (focal-backports/universe) [261-1~bpo20.04.1 => 264-1~bpo20.04.1] (no packageset) | 16:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-machines (impish-backports/universe) [260-1~bpo21.10.1 => 262-1~bpo21.10.1] (no packageset) | 16:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (focal-backports) [264-1~bpo20.04.1] | 16:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (impish-backports) [264-1~bpo21.10.1] | 16:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-machines [source] (impish-backports) [262-1~bpo21.10.1] | 16:58 | |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: not sure if there is time in SRU vanguard today or not. cloud-init has a queued for -proposed (22.1-14-g2e17a0d6) that we'd like to request review for upload into (bionic|focal|impish)-proposed per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1961446 | 16:59 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1961446 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Impish) "sru cloud-init (22.1 update) Bionic, Focal, Impish" [Undecided, New] | 16:59 |
| blackboxsw | I'd also like to reject all 21.1.1 from bionic/focal/impish -proposed queues | 17:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cockpit [amd64] (focal-backports/universe) [264-1~bpo20.04.1] (no packageset) | 17:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cockpit [amd64] (impish-backports/universe) [264-1~bpo21.10.1] (no packageset) | 17:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cockpit [amd64] (focal-backports) [264-1~bpo20.04.1] | 17:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cockpit [amd64] (impish-backports) [264-1~bpo21.10.1] | 17:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vkd3d [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2-11] (i386-whitelist) | 18:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vkd3d [i386] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2-11] (i386-whitelist) | 18:22 | |
| mwhudson | argh what somehow now the capnproto build on ppc64el is the blocker | 18:57 |
| Eickmeyer | mwhudson: numba is looking good with onetbb, it's just running dh_auto_tests now. | 18:59 |
| mwhudson | kj/string-test.c++:38: failed: expected ("-128 -32768 -2147483648 -9223372036854775808") == (str((signed char)-128, ' ', (signed short)-32768, ' ', ((int)-2147483647) - 1, ' ', ((long long)-9223372036854775807ll) - 1)); -128 -32768 -2147483648 -9223372036854775808; str((signed char)-128, ' ', (signed short)-32768, ' ', ((int)-2147483647) - 1, ' ', ((long long)-9223372036854775807ll) - 1) = -128 -32768 -214748364( -9223372036854775808 | 19:45 |
| mwhudson | stack: 8fd0a7d0c7b 8fd0a3980d7 71bf21d168b3 71bf21c8058f 71bf21d149e3 71bf21d1661f 71bf21caf643 71bf21cc1a83 71bf21c8058f 71bf21cb568b 71bf21d1314f 71bf216917a3 71bf21691987 | 19:45 |
| mwhudson | thanks? | 19:45 |
| mwhudson | huh seems to be -2147483648 vs -214748364( | 19:46 |
| mwhudson | that's a single bit of difference... | 19:47 |
| === mfo_ is now known as mfo | ||
| === haggertk_ is now known as haggertk | ||
| mwhudson | argh i think i may have rediscovered this https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto/commit/f94b8b1e866c2f13d646313169e3b2d3dd339b2f#diff-1efa83f8f954ff35477e3a52422534daa6b886fc93af810a4c8ea209ffafe236 | 21:15 |
| ubottu | Commit f94b8b1 in capnproto/capnproto "Fix UBSAN errors." | 21:15 |
| mwhudson | yes seems so | 21:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: numba (jammy-proposed/primary) [0.55.1-0ubuntu1] | 22:33 | |
| Eickmeyer | ubuntu-archive: ^ That's the numba package I've been working on that should help with the python3-defaults migration, and everything else stuck in jammy-proposed waiting for it. | 22:34 |
| Eickmeyer | The packaging is nearly identical to what was in the previous version sync'd from Debian. | 22:34 |
| * RAOF has a look. | 22:35 | |
| RAOF | Has pull-lp-source got out of sync with launchpad's API? | 22:37 |
| Eickmeyer | RAOF: Not sure, but that might not have been a question for me. | 22:38 |
| Eickmeyer | numba was removed from jammy because it FTBFS due to Python 3.10. This version is 3.10-compatible. | 22:38 |
| RAOF | Ah, no. I think it's transient launchpad weirdness. | 22:38 |
| Eickmeyer | Oh, gotcha. | 22:38 |
| mwhudson | RAOF, Eickmeyer: i don't think numba is anything to do with the current non-migration of python | 22:40 |
| mwhudson | so it's good to get this done but lets leave it in NEW for a bit please? | 22:40 |
| Eickmeyer | mwhudson: vorlon said it was a good idea. | 22:40 |
| Eickmeyer | At least, couldn't hurt. | 22:40 |
| mwhudson | hmm maybe it can't hurt | 22:40 |
| mwhudson | just feeling a bit paranoid around britney behaviour | 22:41 |
| Eickmeyer | Britney has some implicit dependency circles going on, so I get it 100%. | 22:42 |
| RAOF | I can easily do the source review and then leave it in binary NEW if you like. | 22:42 |
| Eickmeyer | britney was whining yesterday about numba being missing. | 22:42 |
| Eickmeyer | But yes, mwhudson, I see your capnproto issues. | 22:44 |
| RAOF | (It will go through binary NEW, right? Even though those binaries previously existed?) | 22:44 |
| Eickmeyer | It should, RAOF. | 22:44 |
| RAOF | Eickmeyer: That's totally my expectation, but I've been surprised by LP behaviour in the past! | 22:45 |
| Eickmeyer | RAOF: Especially lately. :) | 22:45 |
| Eickmeyer | RAOF: I test built against all archs except riscv64 in my PPA, built against everything in proposed. | 22:46 |
| === paride1 is now known as paride | ||
| === falcojr9 is now known as falcojr | ||
| mwhudson | come on britney, do your thing | 22:58 |
| Eickmeyer | mwhudson: I feel that statement in my soul right now. | 22:59 |
| RAOF | Eickmeyer: I know that you've taken the packaging from the previous Debian sync, but the debian/copyright fails to list most of the licenses involved. 🤦♀️ | 23:22 |
| Eickmeyer | RAOF: I blame the scientific team for failing to keep that updated then. The only whine I got from lintian was a couple of files that no longer existed. | 23:24 |
| RAOF | Yeah, none of the files have copyright headers. | 23:24 |
| Eickmeyer | I didn't do a licensecheck because I assumed they kept it correct. | 23:25 |
| Eickmeyer | As far as the lack of copyright headers, doesn't it then go under the Files: * copyright? | 23:25 |
| RAOF | But LICENSES.third-party lists code with MIT, BSD-3, PSF… | 23:25 |
| * Eickmeyer isn't at his main computer right now | 23:26 | |
| RAOF | Rather than have copyright headers, they've included relevant github URLs in the headers and then specified the corresponding licenses in LICENSES.third-party. | 23:27 |
| Eickmeyer | Salsa being down made this a lot more difficult than it should've been. | 23:27 |
| RAOF | 👍️ | 23:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected numba [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.55.1-0ubuntu1] | 23:46 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!