mwhudsonwell https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sblim-sfcb/1.4.9-0ubuntu6/+build/22604622 just looks completely broken00:02
Eickmeyermwhudson: RE: numba, looks like a new version is available and just not in sid yet. Should we, idk, just grab the source and JFDI?00:09
mwhudsonEickmeyer: does it support 3.10 yet?00:09
EickmeyerYes, that was added with 0.55.0, it's at 0.55.1 now.00:09
mwhudsonvorlon: wtf https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#sssd adsys/0.8 isn't a thing any more?00:11
mwhudsonvorlon: maybe you should delete adsys again00:13
EickmeyerSalsa down for anybody else? I'm getting a big fat 403 for no good reason.00:13
EickmeyerAhhhhhh yes, thanks, cjwatson.00:14
vorlonmwhudson: I'm retrying adsys autopkgtest with --all-proposed, which given that the test passed w/ -proposed samba, that might do the trick and with less effort than deleting01:36
vorlon(since I would need not only to delete but also block)01:36
mwhudsonvorlon: ok01:36
mwhudsonoh right we want sssd and samba both in triggers01:37
mwhudsonahasenack did one and i did the other01:37
* mwhudson afk for a bit01:38
vorlonoh look.  I can't remove llvm-9 because pocl because llvm-11 because ocaml because plplot because python.01:44
sarnoldpythonshmython. who needs it.01:46
vorlonplplot. plplot does.01:46
vorlonmwhudson: so adsys/armhf still failed with --all-proposed https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy/jammy/armhf/a/adsys/20220301_014840_f08f8@/log.gz01:50
vorlonadsys demoted to proposed; force-skiptest added for sssd (so we don't have to wait for the archive publisher); and britney restarted again02:21
mwhudsonvorlon: bla02:27
mwhudsonvorlon: do you want a hint to stop adsys migrating again?02:28
Eickmeyermwhudson, vorlon: I'm build testing numba in my ppa. It should solve a problem or two with some migration. Want it?02:29
mwhudsonEickmeyer: not right now i think02:29
Eickmeyermwhudson: Ok. Thought I'd ask as I don't want to complicate matters.02:30
vorlonmwhudson: I added a block-proposed bug02:31
mwhudsonvorlon: ah ha02:31
vorlonEickmeyer: numba can't make anything worse, everything that uses it is in proposed only right now02:32
Eickmeyervorlon, mwhudson: It completely ftbfs anyhow, so much for being 3.10 ready.02:34
EickmeyerAnd yes, it was against proposed.02:35
EickmeyerIt's complaining about tbb being too old.02:42
* Eickmeyer finds himself in dependency hell02:42
mwhudsonah that might need a sync maybe?02:43
mwhudsonthere was something on debian-python about that02:43
EickmeyerNope, sid's is too old too.02:43
EickmeyerNeeds 2021 update or better, and 2020 is in sid.02:44
mwhudsonah the one in experimental maybe?02:44
EickmeyerI don't see one in experimental?02:45
mwhudsonoh wait that's https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=onetbb&suite=experimental02:45
mwhudsonis that the same thing at all?02:45
EickmeyerIt should be, but that means the package name changed.02:45
mwhudsonah yes http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/o/onetbb/onetbb_2021.5.0-7_changelog02:46
EickmeyerI'll syncpackage that.02:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: onetbb (jammy-proposed/primary) [2021.5.0-7]02:48
EickmeyerMeans we should probably dummy package tbb -> onetbb02:49
OldManWinterDang, wireguard was promoted, so I can no longer upload.  I guess others are watching more closely anyway though, and can take care of it.02:57
mwhudsonEickmeyer: i think the binary packages are the same03:01
mwhudsonwell up to SONAME03:01
Eickmeyermwhudson: Yeah, in that case do we remove the old tbb in favor of onetbb from the archive?03:01
mwhudsonEickmeyer: i think that would be the usual way, yes03:33
Eickmeyermwhudson: Kinda thought so.03:33
mwhudsonvorlon: i think britney is trolling us again03:37
mwhudsonwhy is source-highlight in proposed in main? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/source-highlight03:38
mwhudsonubuntu-archive: which component should source-hightlight be in?03:40
sarnoldmwhudson: check gdb03:45
mwhudsonsarnold: que?03:47
mwhudsonoh i see03:48
mwhudsonwhy does reverse-depends not see that?03:48
sarnoldusually because I forget the src: thingy :)03:49
mwhudsonoh i see03:49
mwhudsongdb has dropped the dep now03:49
mwhudsonso i think source-highlight can be dropped to universe now too03:49
sarnolddoes something magically do that when unseeded packages are no longer required by seeded packages?03:53
mwhudsonsarnold: no, members of ~ubuntu-archive do that after reading the component-mismatches report04:15
mwhudsonit's on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html04:16
mwhudsonRAOF: hi04:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1]08:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1]08:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [riscv64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1]08:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1]08:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1]08:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1]08:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [amd64] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1]08:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [armhf] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1]08:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [riscv64] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1]08:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [arm64] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1]08:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [s390x] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1]08:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1]08:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-caesar-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]08:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-caesar-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)08:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-weedle-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]08:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-weedle-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)08:21
tjaaltonplease allow libxcvt on i386, it's blocking xorg-server08:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-cubone-rkl-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]08:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-cubone-rkl-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)08:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-beric-amd-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]08:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-beric-amd-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)08:34
seb128mwhudson, vorlon, the adsys release remove is a bit rude, could you at least talk to us about finding solution before removing a package that we own?08:58
mwhudsonseb128: we'll put it back as soon as the python transition is done, which was hoped to be several hours ago08:59
seb128mwhudson, I don't understand why that was even needed, the bug mention autopkgtest failures, can't we just hint ignore those?09:01
ricotzmwhudson, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#source-highlight still blocks python09:01
mwhudsonricotz: we need an aa09:02
ricotzhello seb128 mwhudson09:02
mwhudsonseb128: could you move source-highlight in jammy-proposed to universe?09:02
mwhudson(it's on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html)09:03
seb128mwhudson, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/source-highlight suggests it's already in universe, also that source was in main in impish so probably is needed there?09:04
mwhudsonseb128: it used to be a dependency of gdb but isn't any longer09:04
mwhudsonso i think demotion is appropriate09:04
mwhudsonor its deps need to be promoted again but the current situation is wrong09:05
seb128mwhudson, demoted09:14
mwhudsonseb128: thank you09:14
dokomwhudson: hmm, why did gdb drop source-highlight?09:32
mwhudsondoko: i certainly have no idea09:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ceph [amd64] (jammy-proposed/main) [17.1.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)10:23
RikMillsthe just uploaded ceph seems to have blocked python3-defaults migration? ^^10:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-base1.0 (focal-proposed/main) [1.16.2-4ubuntu0.1 => 1.16.3-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)10:58
ricotzso close :(10:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-drogo-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]11:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-drogo-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)11:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-beric-amd-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]11:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-drogo-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]11:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-caesar-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]11:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-cubone-rkl-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]11:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-weedle-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]11:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ceph [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [17.1.0-0ubuntu1]11:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted onetbb [sync] (jammy-proposed) [2021.5.0-7]11:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-good1.0 (focal-proposed/main) [1.16.2-1ubuntu2.1 => 1.16.3-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)11:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: onetbb [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2021.5.0-7] (no packageset)11:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted onetbb [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2021.5.0-7]11:31
ahasenackwhat's the eta on python3-defaults migrating, does anybody know?12:24
ahasenackI think this is the longest python migration I have ever seen12:24
dokostill faster than ruby-defaults ;p  v*rlon was working on that, but it's now delayed by a new ceph upload12:28
ahasenackoh yeah, ruby is the champion12:29
ahasenackI fear the upcoming bug reports, when these packages finally hit the release pocket12:30
ahasenackbrace for impact12:30
ahasenackwhy is adsys still in excuses, since it hit the release pocket yesterday? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#adsys12:32
ahasenackand with no "prior version" listed12:32
ahasenackI guess many things beyond my understanding are entangled right now :)12:33
ahasenackoh, it moved back to proposed overnight12:34
ricotzjust a reminder :) - <tjaalton> please allow libxcvt on i386, it's blocking xorg-server12:39
RikMillsahasenack: previous ceth upload took 36 hrs to build on riscv64, so I wouldn't bet on any time soon if that stays in proposed12:47
seb128ricotz, tjaalton: libxcvt handled12:48
ricotzseb128, great, thanks12:58
coreycbginggs: it looks like there was some progress on onetbb, have you been keeping tabs on it?13:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libnfsidmap from i386-whitelist in jammy13:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added fonts-nanum to i386-whitelist in jammy13:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added fonts-open-sans to i386-whitelist in jammy13:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gi-docgen to i386-whitelist in jammy13:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added highlight.js to i386-whitelist in jammy13:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libxcvt to i386-whitelist in jammy13:06
=== seb129 is now known as seb128
ginggscoreycb: there was an update to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000336#101 a week ago13:17
ubottuDebian bug 1000336 in src:numba "numba: FTBFS with Python 3.10" [Serious, Open]13:17
ginggsI think there about 8 build failures in onetbb's reverse-build-dependencies13:19
ahasenackRikMills: I thought riscv64 was risc-free13:19
ahasenacki.e., wouldn't block anything13:20
RikMillsahasenack: I think that is still the case for autopkgtests and build time tests, but not for missing builds13:21
RikMillsbut I could be mistaken13:21
ahasenackcan't wait for the rush to fix bugs once these transitions land13:22
ahasenackthat will be the real ff date in practice13:22
RikMillsahasenack: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#netdata13:23
RikMillsexample on something blocked on riscv6413:23
RikMills*of something13:23
coreycbginggs: seems to be progressing, thanks13:55
bdmurrayceph is a new upstream version after Feature Freeze?13:56
seb128bdmurray, the proposed version was already a git snapshot13:57
seb128which was uploaded before feature freeze13:57
bdmurrayseb128: ah okay, I didn't look at the full publishing history13:58
* ahasenack used the same trick with freeradius14:08
ahasenackI'm using a git snapshot of 3.0.2614:09
ricotztjaalton, you can retry it now https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/2:21.1.3-2ubuntu1/+build/2319414814:22
tjaaltonalready tried once14:24
ricotztjaalton, but you didn't wait for the i386 build to be published ;)14:25
ricotzlooks good now14:28
ricotztjaalton, despite the build failure14:29
vorlonjamespage: I'm backing ceph out of -proposed; this resets the entire python+perl+ocaml transition to have it there right now, and it takes days to build on riscv64.  We can copy it back when the transition is done15:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (impish-proposed/main) [4:20.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 4:20.1.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack)15:41
Eickmeyerginggs: onetbb built just fine (sans riscv64), and I've got numba test-building in my PPA wth proposed enabled.15:42
jamespagevorlon: apologies and +115:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: heat (impish-proposed/main) [1:17.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:17.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack)15:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer1.0 (focal-proposed/main) [1.16.2-2 => 1.16.3-0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)16:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceilometer (impish-proposed/main) [2:17.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:17.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack)16:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (impish-backports/universe) [261-1~bpo21.10.1 => 264-1~bpo21.10.1] (no packageset)16:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (focal-backports/universe) [261-1~bpo20.04.1 => 264-1~bpo20.04.1] (no packageset)16:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-machines (impish-backports/universe) [260-1~bpo21.10.1 => 262-1~bpo21.10.1] (no packageset)16:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (focal-backports) [264-1~bpo20.04.1]16:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (impish-backports) [264-1~bpo21.10.1]16:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-machines [source] (impish-backports) [262-1~bpo21.10.1]16:58
blackboxswbdmurray: not sure if there is time in SRU vanguard today or not. cloud-init has a queued  for -proposed (22.1-14-g2e17a0d6) that we'd like to request review for upload  into (bionic|focal|impish)-proposed  per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/196144616:59
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1961446 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Impish) "sru cloud-init (22.1 update) Bionic, Focal, Impish" [Undecided, New]16:59
blackboxswI'd also like to reject all 21.1.1 from bionic/focal/impish -proposed queues17:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cockpit [amd64] (focal-backports/universe) [264-1~bpo20.04.1] (no packageset)17:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cockpit [amd64] (impish-backports/universe) [264-1~bpo21.10.1] (no packageset)17:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cockpit [amd64] (focal-backports) [264-1~bpo20.04.1]17:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cockpit [amd64] (impish-backports) [264-1~bpo21.10.1]17:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vkd3d [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2-11] (i386-whitelist)18:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vkd3d [i386] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2-11] (i386-whitelist)18:22
mwhudsonargh what somehow now the capnproto build on ppc64el is the blocker18:57
Eickmeyermwhudson: numba is looking good with onetbb, it's just running dh_auto_tests now.18:59
mwhudsonkj/string-test.c++:38: failed: expected ("-128 -32768 -2147483648 -9223372036854775808") == (str((signed char)-128, ' ', (signed short)-32768, ' ', ((int)-2147483647) - 1, ' ', ((long long)-9223372036854775807ll) - 1)); -128 -32768 -2147483648 -9223372036854775808; str((signed char)-128, ' ', (signed short)-32768, ' ', ((int)-2147483647) - 1, ' ', ((long long)-9223372036854775807ll) - 1) = -128 -32768 -214748364( -922337203685477580819:45
mwhudsonstack: 8fd0a7d0c7b 8fd0a3980d7 71bf21d168b3 71bf21c8058f 71bf21d149e3 71bf21d1661f 71bf21caf643 71bf21cc1a83 71bf21c8058f 71bf21cb568b 71bf21d1314f 71bf216917a3 71bf2169198719:45
mwhudsonhuh seems to be -2147483648 vs -214748364(19:46
mwhudsonthat's a single bit of difference...19:47
=== mfo_ is now known as mfo
=== haggertk_ is now known as haggertk
mwhudsonargh i think i may have rediscovered this https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto/commit/f94b8b1e866c2f13d646313169e3b2d3dd339b2f#diff-1efa83f8f954ff35477e3a52422534daa6b886fc93af810a4c8ea209ffafe23621:15
ubottuCommit f94b8b1 in capnproto/capnproto "Fix UBSAN errors."21:15
mwhudsonyes seems so21:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: numba (jammy-proposed/primary) [0.55.1-0ubuntu1]22:33
Eickmeyerubuntu-archive: ^ That's the numba package I've been working on that should help with the python3-defaults migration, and everything else stuck in jammy-proposed waiting for it.22:34
EickmeyerThe packaging is nearly identical to what was in the previous version sync'd from Debian.22:34
* RAOF has a look.22:35
RAOFHas pull-lp-source got out of sync with launchpad's API?22:37
EickmeyerRAOF: Not sure, but that might not have been a question for me.22:38
Eickmeyernumba was removed from jammy because it FTBFS due to Python 3.10. This version is 3.10-compatible.22:38
RAOFAh, no. I think it's transient launchpad weirdness.22:38
EickmeyerOh, gotcha.22:38
mwhudsonRAOF, Eickmeyer: i don't think numba is anything to do with the current non-migration of python22:40
mwhudsonso it's good to get this done but lets leave it in NEW for a bit please?22:40
Eickmeyermwhudson: vorlon said it was a good idea.22:40
EickmeyerAt least, couldn't hurt.22:40
mwhudsonhmm maybe it can't hurt22:40
mwhudsonjust feeling a bit paranoid around britney behaviour22:41
EickmeyerBritney has some implicit dependency circles going on, so I get it 100%.22:42
RAOFI can easily do the source review and then leave it in binary NEW if you like.22:42
Eickmeyerbritney was whining yesterday about numba being missing.22:42
EickmeyerBut yes, mwhudson, I see your capnproto issues.22:44
RAOF(It will go through binary NEW, right? Even though those binaries previously existed?)22:44
EickmeyerIt should, RAOF.22:44
RAOFEickmeyer: That's totally my expectation, but I've been surprised by LP behaviour in the past!22:45
EickmeyerRAOF: Especially lately. :)22:45
EickmeyerRAOF: I test built against all archs except riscv64 in my PPA, built against everything in proposed.22:46
=== paride1 is now known as paride
=== falcojr9 is now known as falcojr
mwhudsoncome on britney, do your thing22:58
Eickmeyermwhudson: I feel that statement in my soul right now.22:59
RAOFEickmeyer: I know that you've taken the packaging from the previous Debian sync, but the debian/copyright fails to list most of the licenses involved. 🤦‍♀️23:22
EickmeyerRAOF: I blame the scientific team for failing to keep that updated then. The only whine I got from lintian was a couple of files that no longer existed.23:24
RAOFYeah, none of the files have copyright headers.23:24
EickmeyerI didn't do a licensecheck because I assumed they kept it correct.23:25
EickmeyerAs far as the lack of copyright headers, doesn't it then go under the Files: * copyright?23:25
RAOFBut LICENSES.third-party lists code with MIT, BSD-3, PSF…23:25
* Eickmeyer isn't at his main computer right now23:26
RAOFRather than have copyright headers, they've included relevant github URLs in the headers and then specified the corresponding licenses in LICENSES.third-party.23:27
EickmeyerSalsa being down made this a lot more difficult than it should've been.23:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected numba [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.55.1-0ubuntu1]23:46

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!