[00:02] <mwhudson> well https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sblim-sfcb/1.4.9-0ubuntu6/+build/22604622 just looks completely broken
[00:09] <Eickmeyer> mwhudson: RE: numba, looks like a new version is available and just not in sid yet. Should we, idk, just grab the source and JFDI?
[00:09] <mwhudson> Eickmeyer: does it support 3.10 yet?
[00:09] <Eickmeyer> Yes, that was added with 0.55.0, it's at 0.55.1 now.
[00:11] <Eickmeyer> https://github.com/numba/numba/releases
[00:11] <mwhudson> vorlon: wtf https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#sssd adsys/0.8 isn't a thing any more?
[00:13] <mwhudson> vorlon: maybe you should delete adsys again
[00:13] <Eickmeyer> Salsa down for anybody else? I'm getting a big fat 403 for no good reason.
[00:14] <cjwatson> https://lists.debian.org/debian-infrastructure-announce/2022/02/msg00000.html
[00:14] <Eickmeyer> Ahhhhhh yes, thanks, cjwatson.
[01:36] <vorlon> mwhudson: I'm retrying adsys autopkgtest with --all-proposed, which given that the test passed w/ -proposed samba, that might do the trick and with less effort than deleting
[01:36] <vorlon> (since I would need not only to delete but also block)
[01:36] <mwhudson> vorlon: ok
[01:37] <mwhudson> oh right we want sssd and samba both in triggers
[01:37] <mwhudson> ahasenack did one and i did the other
[01:38]  * mwhudson afk for a bit
[01:44] <vorlon> oh look.  I can't remove llvm-9 because pocl because llvm-11 because ocaml because plplot because python.
[01:46] <sarnold> pythonshmython. who needs it.
[01:46] <vorlon> plplot. plplot does.
[01:50] <vorlon> mwhudson: so adsys/armhf still failed with --all-proposed https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy/jammy/armhf/a/adsys/20220301_014840_f08f8@/log.gz
[02:21] <vorlon> adsys demoted to proposed; force-skiptest added for sssd (so we don't have to wait for the archive publisher); and britney restarted again
[02:27] <mwhudson> vorlon: bla
[02:28] <mwhudson> vorlon: do you want a hint to stop adsys migrating again?
[02:29] <Eickmeyer> mwhudson, vorlon: I'm build testing numba in my ppa. It should solve a problem or two with some migration. Want it?
[02:29] <mwhudson> Eickmeyer: not right now i think
[02:30] <Eickmeyer> mwhudson: Ok. Thought I'd ask as I don't want to complicate matters.
[02:31] <vorlon> mwhudson: I added a block-proposed bug
[02:31] <mwhudson> vorlon: ah ha
[02:32] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: numba can't make anything worse, everything that uses it is in proposed only right now
[02:34] <Eickmeyer> vorlon, mwhudson: It completely ftbfs anyhow, so much for being 3.10 ready.
[02:35] <Eickmeyer> And yes, it was against proposed.
[02:42] <Eickmeyer> It's complaining about tbb being too old.
[02:42]  * Eickmeyer finds himself in dependency hell
[02:43] <mwhudson> ah that might need a sync maybe?
[02:43] <mwhudson> there was something on debian-python about that
[02:43] <Eickmeyer> Nope, sid's is too old too.
[02:44] <Eickmeyer> Needs 2021 update or better, and 2020 is in sid.
[02:44] <mwhudson> ah the one in experimental maybe?
[02:45] <Eickmeyer> I don't see one in experimental?
[02:45] <mwhudson> oh wait that's https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=onetbb&suite=experimental
[02:45] <mwhudson> is that the same thing at all?
[02:45] <Eickmeyer> It should be, but that means the package name changed.
[02:46] <mwhudson> ah yes http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/o/onetbb/onetbb_2021.5.0-7_changelog
[02:46] <Eickmeyer> Aha!@
[02:46] <Eickmeyer> I'll syncpackage that.
[02:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: onetbb (jammy-proposed/primary) [2021.5.0-7]
[02:49] <Eickmeyer> Means we should probably dummy package tbb -> onetbb
[02:57] <OldManWinter> Dang, wireguard was promoted, so I can no longer upload.  I guess others are watching more closely anyway though, and can take care of it.
[03:01] <mwhudson> Eickmeyer: i think the binary packages are the same
[03:01] <mwhudson> well up to SONAME
[03:01] <Eickmeyer> mwhudson: Yeah, in that case do we remove the old tbb in favor of onetbb from the archive?
[03:33] <mwhudson> Eickmeyer: i think that would be the usual way, yes
[03:33] <Eickmeyer> mwhudson: Kinda thought so.
[03:37] <mwhudson> vorlon: i think britney is trolling us again
[03:37] <mwhudson> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#source-highlight
[03:38] <mwhudson> why is source-highlight in proposed in main? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/source-highlight
[03:40] <mwhudson> ubuntu-archive: which component should source-hightlight be in?
[03:45] <sarnold> mwhudson: check gdb
[03:47] <mwhudson> sarnold: que?
[03:48] <mwhudson> oh i see
[03:48] <mwhudson> why does reverse-depends not see that?
[03:49] <sarnold> usually because I forget the src: thingy :)
[03:49] <mwhudson> oh i see
[03:49] <mwhudson> gdb has dropped the dep now
[03:49] <mwhudson> so i think source-highlight can be dropped to universe now too
[03:53] <sarnold> does something magically do that when unseeded packages are no longer required by seeded packages?
[04:15] <mwhudson> sarnold: no, members of ~ubuntu-archive do that after reading the component-mismatches report
[04:16] <mwhudson> it's on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html
[04:19] <mwhudson> RAOF: hi
[04:19] <mwhudson> ?
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1]
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1]
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [riscv64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1]
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1]
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1]
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3~20.04.1]
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [amd64] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1]
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [armhf] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [riscv64] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [arm64] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [s390x] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [1.7.5-3~21.10.1]
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-caesar-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[08:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-caesar-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[08:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-weedle-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[08:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-weedle-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[08:23] <tjaalton> please allow libxcvt on i386, it's blocking xorg-server
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-cubone-rkl-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-cubone-rkl-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[08:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-beric-amd-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-beric-amd-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[08:58] <seb128> mwhudson, vorlon, the adsys release remove is a bit rude, could you at least talk to us about finding solution before removing a package that we own?
[08:59] <mwhudson> seb128: we'll put it back as soon as the python transition is done, which was hoped to be several hours ago
[09:01] <seb128> mwhudson, I don't understand why that was even needed, the bug mention autopkgtest failures, can't we just hint ignore those?
[09:01] <ricotz> mwhudson, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#source-highlight still blocks python
[09:02] <mwhudson> ricotz: we need an aa
[09:02] <ricotz> hello seb128 mwhudson
[09:02] <mwhudson> seb128: could you move source-highlight in jammy-proposed to universe?
[09:03] <mwhudson> (it's on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html)
[09:04] <seb128> mwhudson, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/source-highlight suggests it's already in universe, also that source was in main in impish so probably is needed there?
[09:04] <mwhudson> seb128: it used to be a dependency of gdb but isn't any longer
[09:04] <mwhudson> so i think demotion is appropriate
[09:05] <mwhudson> or its deps need to be promoted again but the current situation is wrong
[09:14] <seb128> mwhudson, demoted
[09:14] <mwhudson> seb128: thank you
[09:32] <doko> mwhudson: hmm, why did gdb drop source-highlight?
[09:32] <mwhudson> doko: i certainly have no idea
[10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ceph [amd64] (jammy-proposed/main) [17.1.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[10:54] <RikMills> the just uploaded ceph seems to have blocked python3-defaults migration? ^^
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-base1.0 (focal-proposed/main) [1.16.2-4ubuntu0.1 => 1.16.3-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[10:59] <ricotz> so close :(
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-drogo-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-drogo-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-beric-amd-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-drogo-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-caesar-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-cubone-rkl-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-weedle-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ceph [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [17.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted onetbb [sync] (jammy-proposed) [2021.5.0-7]
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-good1.0 (focal-proposed/main) [1.16.2-1ubuntu2.1 => 1.16.3-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: onetbb [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2021.5.0-7] (no packageset)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted onetbb [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2021.5.0-7]
[12:24] <ahasenack> what's the eta on python3-defaults migrating, does anybody know?
[12:24] <ahasenack> I think this is the longest python migration I have ever seen
[12:28] <doko> still faster than ruby-defaults ;p  v*rlon was working on that, but it's now delayed by a new ceph upload
[12:29] <ahasenack> oh yeah, ruby is the champion
[12:30] <ahasenack> I fear the upcoming bug reports, when these packages finally hit the release pocket
[12:30] <ahasenack> brace for impact
[12:32] <ahasenack> why is adsys still in excuses, since it hit the release pocket yesterday? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#adsys
[12:32] <ahasenack> and with no "prior version" listed
[12:33] <ahasenack> I guess many things beyond my understanding are entangled right now :)
[12:34] <ahasenack> oh, it moved back to proposed overnight
[12:39] <ricotz> just a reminder :) - <tjaalton> please allow libxcvt on i386, it's blocking xorg-server
[12:47] <RikMills> ahasenack: previous ceth upload took 36 hrs to build on riscv64, so I wouldn't bet on any time soon if that stays in proposed
[12:48] <seb128> ricotz, tjaalton: libxcvt handled
[12:58] <ricotz> seb128, great, thanks
[13:00] <coreycb> ginggs: it looks like there was some progress on onetbb, have you been keeping tabs on it?
[13:03] <tjaalton> thanks!
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libnfsidmap from i386-whitelist in jammy
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added fonts-nanum to i386-whitelist in jammy
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added fonts-open-sans to i386-whitelist in jammy
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gi-docgen to i386-whitelist in jammy
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added highlight.js to i386-whitelist in jammy
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libxcvt to i386-whitelist in jammy
[13:17] <ginggs> coreycb: there was an update to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000336#101 a week ago
[13:19] <ginggs> I think there about 8 build failures in onetbb's reverse-build-dependencies
[13:19] <ahasenack> RikMills: I thought riscv64 was risc-free
[13:20] <ahasenack> i.e., wouldn't block anything
[13:21] <RikMills> ahasenack: I think that is still the case for autopkgtests and build time tests, but not for missing builds
[13:21] <RikMills> but I could be mistaken
[13:22] <ahasenack> can't wait for the rush to fix bugs once these transitions land
[13:22] <ahasenack> that will be the real ff date in practice
[13:23] <RikMills> ahasenack: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#netdata
[13:23] <RikMills> example on something blocked on riscv64
[13:23] <RikMills> *of something
[13:55] <coreycb> ginggs: seems to be progressing, thanks
[13:56] <bdmurray> ceph is a new upstream version after Feature Freeze?
[13:57] <seb128> bdmurray, the proposed version was already a git snapshot
[13:57] <seb128> which was uploaded before feature freeze
[13:58] <bdmurray> seb128: ah okay, I didn't look at the full publishing history
[14:08]  * ahasenack used the same trick with freeradius
[14:09] <ahasenack> I'm using a git snapshot of 3.0.26
[14:22] <ricotz> tjaalton, you can retry it now https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/2:21.1.3-2ubuntu1/+build/23194148
[14:24] <tjaalton> already tried once
[14:25] <ricotz> tjaalton, but you didn't wait for the i386 build to be published ;)
[14:28] <tjaalton> right
[14:28] <ricotz> looks good now
[14:29] <ricotz> tjaalton, despite the build failure
[15:06] <vorlon> jamespage: I'm backing ceph out of -proposed; this resets the entire python+perl+ocaml transition to have it there right now, and it takes days to build on riscv64.  We can copy it back when the transition is done
[15:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (impish-proposed/main) [4:20.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 4:20.1.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[15:42] <Eickmeyer> ginggs: onetbb built just fine (sans riscv64), and I've got numba test-building in my PPA wth proposed enabled.
[15:48] <jamespage> vorlon: apologies and +1
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: heat (impish-proposed/main) [1:17.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:17.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer1.0 (focal-proposed/main) [1.16.2-2 => 1.16.3-0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceilometer (impish-proposed/main) [2:17.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:17.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[16:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (impish-backports/universe) [261-1~bpo21.10.1 => 264-1~bpo21.10.1] (no packageset)
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (focal-backports/universe) [261-1~bpo20.04.1 => 264-1~bpo20.04.1] (no packageset)
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-machines (impish-backports/universe) [260-1~bpo21.10.1 => 262-1~bpo21.10.1] (no packageset)
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (focal-backports) [264-1~bpo20.04.1]
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (impish-backports) [264-1~bpo21.10.1]
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-machines [source] (impish-backports) [262-1~bpo21.10.1]
[16:59] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: not sure if there is time in SRU vanguard today or not. cloud-init has a queued  for -proposed (22.1-14-g2e17a0d6) that we'd like to request review for upload  into (bionic|focal|impish)-proposed  per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1961446
[17:00] <blackboxsw> I'd also like to reject all 21.1.1 from bionic/focal/impish -proposed queues
[17:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cockpit [amd64] (focal-backports/universe) [264-1~bpo20.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cockpit [amd64] (impish-backports/universe) [264-1~bpo21.10.1] (no packageset)
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cockpit [amd64] (focal-backports) [264-1~bpo20.04.1]
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cockpit [amd64] (impish-backports) [264-1~bpo21.10.1]
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vkd3d [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2-11] (i386-whitelist)
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vkd3d [i386] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2-11] (i386-whitelist)
[18:57] <mwhudson> argh what somehow now the capnproto build on ppc64el is the blocker
[18:59] <Eickmeyer> mwhudson: numba is looking good with onetbb, it's just running dh_auto_tests now.
[19:45] <mwhudson> kj/string-test.c++:38: failed: expected ("-128 -32768 -2147483648 -9223372036854775808") == (str((signed char)-128, ' ', (signed short)-32768, ' ', ((int)-2147483647) - 1, ' ', ((long long)-9223372036854775807ll) - 1)); -128 -32768 -2147483648 -9223372036854775808; str((signed char)-128, ' ', (signed short)-32768, ' ', ((int)-2147483647) - 1, ' ', ((long long)-9223372036854775807ll) - 1) = -128 -32768 -214748364( -9223372036854775808
[19:45] <mwhudson> stack: 8fd0a7d0c7b 8fd0a3980d7 71bf21d168b3 71bf21c8058f 71bf21d149e3 71bf21d1661f 71bf21caf643 71bf21cc1a83 71bf21c8058f 71bf21cb568b 71bf21d1314f 71bf216917a3 71bf21691987
[19:45] <mwhudson> thanks?
[19:46] <mwhudson> huh seems to be -2147483648 vs -214748364(
[19:47] <mwhudson> that's a single bit of difference...
[21:15] <mwhudson> argh i think i may have rediscovered this https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto/commit/f94b8b1e866c2f13d646313169e3b2d3dd339b2f#diff-1efa83f8f954ff35477e3a52422534daa6b886fc93af810a4c8ea209ffafe236
[21:54] <mwhudson> yes seems so
[22:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: numba (jammy-proposed/primary) [0.55.1-0ubuntu1]
[22:34] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-archive: ^ That's the numba package I've been working on that should help with the python3-defaults migration, and everything else stuck in jammy-proposed waiting for it.
[22:34] <Eickmeyer> The packaging is nearly identical to what was in the previous version sync'd from Debian.
[22:35]  * RAOF has a look.
[22:37] <RAOF> Has pull-lp-source got out of sync with launchpad's API?
[22:38] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: Not sure, but that might not have been a question for me.
[22:38] <Eickmeyer> numba was removed from jammy because it FTBFS due to Python 3.10. This version is 3.10-compatible.
[22:38] <RAOF> Ah, no. I think it's transient launchpad weirdness.
[22:38] <Eickmeyer> Oh, gotcha.
[22:40] <mwhudson> RAOF, Eickmeyer: i don't think numba is anything to do with the current non-migration of python
[22:40] <mwhudson> so it's good to get this done but lets leave it in NEW for a bit please?
[22:40] <Eickmeyer> mwhudson: vorlon said it was a good idea.
[22:40] <Eickmeyer> At least, couldn't hurt.
[22:40] <mwhudson> hmm maybe it can't hurt
[22:41] <mwhudson> just feeling a bit paranoid around britney behaviour
[22:42] <Eickmeyer> Britney has some implicit dependency circles going on, so I get it 100%.
[22:42] <RAOF> I can easily do the source review and then leave it in binary NEW if you like.
[22:42] <Eickmeyer> britney was whining yesterday about numba being missing.
[22:44] <Eickmeyer> But yes, mwhudson, I see your capnproto issues.
[22:44] <RAOF> (It will go through binary NEW, right? Even though those binaries previously existed?)
[22:44] <Eickmeyer> It should, RAOF.
[22:45] <RAOF> Eickmeyer: That's totally my expectation, but I've been surprised by LP behaviour in the past!
[22:45] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: Especially lately. :)
[22:46] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: I test built against all archs except riscv64 in my PPA, built against everything in proposed.
[22:58] <mwhudson> come on britney, do your thing
[22:59] <Eickmeyer> mwhudson: I feel that statement in my soul right now.
[23:22] <RAOF> Eickmeyer: I know that you've taken the packaging from the previous Debian sync, but the debian/copyright fails to list most of the licenses involved. 🤦‍♀️
[23:24] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: I blame the scientific team for failing to keep that updated then. The only whine I got from lintian was a couple of files that no longer existed.
[23:24] <RAOF> Yeah, none of the files have copyright headers.
[23:25] <Eickmeyer> I didn't do a licensecheck because I assumed they kept it correct.
[23:25] <Eickmeyer> As far as the lack of copyright headers, doesn't it then go under the Files: * copyright?
[23:25] <RAOF> But LICENSES.third-party lists code with MIT, BSD-3, PSF…
[23:26]  * Eickmeyer isn't at his main computer right now
[23:27] <RAOF> Rather than have copyright headers, they've included relevant github URLs in the headers and then specified the corresponding licenses in LICENSES.third-party.
[23:27] <Eickmeyer> Salsa being down made this a lot more difficult than it should've been.
[23:27] <RAOF> 👍️
[23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected numba [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.55.1-0ubuntu1]