oSoMoNgood morning desktoppers07:12
dufluHi oSoMoN 07:14
oSoMoNhi duflu 07:14
jpnurmigood morning oSoMoN and hi duflu07:16
oSoMoNgood morning jpnurmi 07:17
dufluHi jpnurmi 07:21
dufluHi Nafallo 08:35
KGB-0gnome-shell-extension-harddisk-led tags 4c499b3 Jonathan Carter upstream/29 * https://deb.li/3jX3F08:44
Nafallogot a bug about ubiquity crashing with an HDMI cabel attached?09:32
lunaUpdated from Ubuntu MATE 20.04.2 to 20.04.4 yesterday, and it went fine, to remove 6 packages and add 256 other ones :)09:36
lunaalso morning desktoppers09:36
KGB-2gnome-shell Muqtadir   299358 * commented merge request !56 * https://deb.li/3Hcjx09:54
Nafallojpnurmi: do we have a testing area on iso.qa for the new installer?10:17
jpnurmiNafallo: i don't know what's the current status but afaik the qa team is setting it up10:21
lunais the daily builds gonna be fixed, last build was 23th February afaik10:22
lunafor the new installer that is*10:22
jpnurmiseb128: do you know what's going on with the daily canary builds?10:24
Nafallojpnurmi: does it make sense to test them for the testing week? :-)10:30
Nafallojpnurmi: https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/429/builds/244794/testcases found it!10:32
Nafallohmm. think we're moving on to non-canary :-)10:55
jpnurmiooh, nice!10:57
jpnurmiwell, currently, the latest available iso is one week old... :(10:57
Nafalloyeah, that's the one that seems to be confused about how to install linux-generic :-)10:59
Nafalloright. we're taking a lunch break11:01
slyonhey Trevinho, seb128: the latest gjs bumped its mozjs dependency from mozjs78 to mozjs91, I couldn't find a prior MIR for mozjs78 so I guess we should do a proper/full MIR for mozjs91. May I ask you to have a look at that? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozjs91/+bug/196259111:03
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1962591 in mozjs91 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] mozjs91" [Undecided, Incomplete]11:03
seb128slyon, hey, it's the same source we roll on newer series11:04
Trevinhoslyon: I think didier will look into that, not sure it's a full MIR request though... being just an updated version of the same11:04
Trevinhowe may need one for adwaita though11:04
slyonTrevinho: but has there been a prio MIR somewhere? I couldn't find any11:04
seb128slyon, I'm trying to figure out when it was promoted, mozjs52 was already in main in bionic11:05
TrevinhoI can't either, I guess there was one in the past11:06
Trevinhoand we've this note (unrelated to MIR though, and not totally true anymore) https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/FAQ#mozjs11:06
seb128slyon, ah, found it, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozjs38/+bug/168393711:06
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1683937 in mozjs38 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] mozjs38" [Undecided, Fix Released]11:06
slyonseb128: thanks that'd be great. If we can find any documentation about it we should reference that to the MIR bug mentioned above, so we can consider it as "just a version bump"11:07
slyonseb128: awesome. I'll put that into LP!11:07
seb128slyon, thanks!11:07
seb128slyon, which also points out the wiki section Trevinho mentioned11:08
Nafallowelcome alocer[m], my collegue :-)14:12
alocer[m]Hello everyone. :-) 14:12
oSoMoNwelcome here alocer[m] 14:17
seb128hey alocer[m] 14:20

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!