[07:12] good morning desktoppers [07:14] Hi oSoMoN [07:14] hi duflu [07:16] good morning oSoMoN and hi duflu [07:17] good morning jpnurmi [07:21] Hi jpnurmi [08:23] morning! [08:35] Hi Nafallo [08:44] gnome-shell-extension-harddisk-led tags 4c499b3 Jonathan Carter upstream/29 * https://deb.li/3jX3F [09:32] got a bug about ubiquity crashing with an HDMI cabel attached? [09:36] Updated from Ubuntu MATE 20.04.2 to 20.04.4 yesterday, and it went fine, to remove 6 packages and add 256 other ones :) [09:36] also morning desktoppers [09:54] gnome-shell Muqtadir 299358 * commented merge request !56 * https://deb.li/3Hcjx [10:17] jpnurmi: do we have a testing area on iso.qa for the new installer? [10:21] Nafallo: i don't know what's the current status but afaik the qa team is setting it up [10:22] is the daily builds gonna be fixed, last build was 23th February afaik [10:22] for the new installer that is* [10:24] seb128: do you know what's going on with the daily canary builds? [10:30] jpnurmi: does it make sense to test them for the testing week? :-) [10:32] jpnurmi: https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/429/builds/244794/testcases found it! [10:34] (testing) [10:55] hmm. think we're moving on to non-canary :-) [10:57] ooh, nice! [10:57] well, currently, the latest available iso is one week old... :( [10:59] yeah, that's the one that seems to be confused about how to install linux-generic :-) [11:01] right. we're taking a lunch break [11:03] hey Trevinho, seb128: the latest gjs bumped its mozjs dependency from mozjs78 to mozjs91, I couldn't find a prior MIR for mozjs78 so I guess we should do a proper/full MIR for mozjs91. May I ask you to have a look at that? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozjs91/+bug/1962591 [11:03] Launchpad bug 1962591 in mozjs91 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] mozjs91" [Undecided, Incomplete] [11:04] slyon, hey, it's the same source we roll on newer series [11:04] slyon: I think didier will look into that, not sure it's a full MIR request though... being just an updated version of the same [11:04] we may need one for adwaita though [11:04] Trevinho: but has there been a prio MIR somewhere? I couldn't find any [11:05] slyon, I'm trying to figure out when it was promoted, mozjs52 was already in main in bionic [11:06] I can't either, I guess there was one in the past [11:06] and we've this note (unrelated to MIR though, and not totally true anymore) https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/FAQ#mozjs [11:06] slyon, ah, found it, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozjs38/+bug/1683937 [11:06] Launchpad bug 1683937 in mozjs38 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] mozjs38" [Undecided, Fix Released] [11:07] seb128: thanks that'd be great. If we can find any documentation about it we should reference that to the MIR bug mentioned above, so we can consider it as "just a version bump" [11:07] seb128: awesome. I'll put that into LP! [11:07] slyon, thanks! [11:08] slyon, which also points out the wiki section Trevinho mentioned [14:12] welcome alocer[m], my collegue :-) [14:12] Hello everyone. :-) [14:17] welcome here alocer[m] [14:20] hey alocer[m]