/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/03/03/#lubuntu-devel.txt

lubot[telegram] <lynorian> using only open source drivers means I don't really have a useful screenshot for proprietary drivers.01:00
guivercgrrrr...  (playing on a box with jammy live looking at if software sources shows 'additional drivers' & another issue I thought was fixed appears.... grrrr02:59
guiverc@lyonrian, I've a box that has 'additional drivers' visible.. if that's what you're after03:00
guiverc@lynorian, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/588743146/screen01.jpg shows what I see (that is pic showing menu opening wrong spot added to bug filing.. BUT if you tell me if I can make something useful and I'll use the box for you if helpful)03:10
=== genii-core is now known as genii
lubot[telegram] <Leokolb> RE : QA iso Jammy posted this in Ubuntu testers irc for those who missed it https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-qa-website/+bug/196281517:27
ubot93Launchpad bug 1962815 in Ubuntu QA Website "Link to download information are incorrect" [Undecided, New]17:27
lubot[telegram] <RikMills> That is because the ISO scripts are failing to copy the ISO files to cdimage mirrors (re @Leokolb: RE : QA iso Jammy posted this in Ubuntu testers irc for those who missed it https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-qa-website/+bug/1962815)17:29
ubot93Launchpad bug 1962815 in Ubuntu QA Website "Link to download information are incorrect" [Undecided, New]17:29
lubot[telegram] <kc2bez> Thanks Rik, I was just typing something similar.17:30
lubot[telegram] <RikMills> I guess the QA site doesn't know it failed17:30
lubot[telegram] <Leokolb> Tks @RikMills and @kc2bez — well any ways we know😊17:31
lubot[telegram] <RikMills> I mentioned it in #ubuntu-release earlier, but a lot of canonical people are on a sprint, so I don't think it was noticed17:33
lubot[telegram] <Leokolb> This has happened before and usually takes a day or two to get back to normal17:34
kgiiiNone of the daily .iso download methods are working - confirmed from multiple systems in multiple locations. HTTP, RSYNC, and ZSYNC are all not resolving to anything. I've seen this before, but it has always resolved itself within 30 to 45 minutes. Today, it has not done so. I'll keep checking though, historically speaking, it has somehow resolved itself much more quickly.20:19
lubot[telegram] <teward001> maybe i should poke the release team and canonical sysadmins but i bet they already know.21:44
lubot[telegram] <guiverc> I've seen mention of a sprint so few are 'around' in normal sense I gather21:45
kgiiiIt is still broken. I've checked fairly consistently for the past five hours. I'm calling it. I'm done checking for a while. I may check again in a few hours, but that's getting close to my bed time. ;-)23:04
lubot[telegram] <kc2bez> Unless someone triggers a rebuild it won't even try until tomorrow.23:06
lubot[telegram] <kc2bez> I can do that but their isn't any changes made on the Lubuntu side since it was last tested.23:07
lubot[telegram] <kc2bez> If you haven't read it this link describes the iso build process very well. https://phab.lubuntu.me/w/release-team/iso-building/23:10
lubot[telegram] <kc2bez> It includes a link to check the build logs23:10
lubot[telegram] <kc2bez> If a build fails the product managers get an email. (I did in this case)23:11
kgiiiHuh... I wonder why it still says there's a new build available when it hasn't actually finished? Ah well... That's way above my pay grade. 23:50

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!