| pieq | Hello! | 03:20 |
|---|---|---|
| pieq | I have a question regarding launchpadlib: | 03:21 |
| pieq | https://launchpad.net/+apidoc/devel.html#bug-addAttachment | 03:21 |
| pieq | There is a "content_type" parameter that is not mandatory. What does launchpadlib do to determine the content type if none is provided? | 03:22 |
| guruprasad | pieq, if a value is not provided for the 'content_type' parameter, Launchpad tries to guess it using the 'guess_content_type' function from 'zope.contenttype' (https://zopecontenttype.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api.html#zope.contenttype.guess_content_type) | 07:44 |
| guruprasad | Afaics, Launchpadlib does not pass a value for 'content_type' when it is not provided and this is handled on the backend. | 07:45 |
| pieq | guruprasad: thanks! | 08:14 |
| guruprasad | pieq, you are welcome! | 08:51 |
| ricotz | hello :), is there an ETA for lgw01 builders being back online? | 12:10 |
| cjwatson | ricotz: they're intentionally offline and retained only for emergencies | 12:19 |
| cjwatson | lcy02 does seem to need a bit of attention right now, but I'd prefer to only enable lgw01 if lcy02 is entirely dead | 12:19 |
| cjwatson | (lgw01 is an older hardware generation; the datacentre it's in isn't quite marked for decommissioning yet, but we're generally trying to move stuff out of it where practical) | 12:22 |
| ricotz | cjwatson, hi, does lgw01 provide more RAM for a builder instance? | 12:25 |
| cjwatson | ricotz: no | 12:25 |
| cjwatson | lgw01 is *older* than lcy02 and less good in most ways, though as it happens the core count, RAM, and disk configurations are the same | 12:25 |
| ricotz | I am building libreoffice on impish which occasionally fails with a linker error, likely an OOM | 12:26 |
| cjwatson | then lgw01 will not help you | 12:26 |
| ricotz | but re-tries lately result in the same failure consistently :( | 12:26 |
| cjwatson | it would just be slower | 12:26 |
| ricotz | I see, could be less concurrent jobs | 12:26 |
| cjwatson | we've talked about upping builder RAM allocations to 16GiB across the board, but haven't done that yet (and need to ensure that it isn't going to cause any problems) | 12:27 |
| ricotz | I see, I was about to ask for some current specs | 12:28 |
| ricotz | so there are not special builders, like for the autopkgtests which more RAM | 12:28 |
| cjwatson | ricotz: No; that's difficult to arrange since for latency reasons we do the reset of a builder before we know what's going to be dispatched to it | 12:31 |
| cjwatson | And we don't at present maintain a "large" pool or something. We may have to at some point, but that would be a chunk of complexity across the board so I want to resist that as long as possible | 12:32 |
| ricotz | thank you for the insights, I hoping the mentioned build succeeds at some point | 12:33 |
| === locutusofborg_ is now known as LocutusOfBorg | ||
| === tolecnal_ is now known as tolecnal | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!