[03:20] <pieq> Hello!
[03:21] <pieq> I have a question regarding launchpadlib:
[03:21] <pieq> https://launchpad.net/+apidoc/devel.html#bug-addAttachment
[03:22] <pieq> There is a "content_type" parameter that is not mandatory. What does launchpadlib do to determine the content type if none is provided?
[07:44] <guruprasad> pieq, if a value is not provided for the 'content_type' parameter, Launchpad tries to guess it using the 'guess_content_type' function from 'zope.contenttype' (https://zopecontenttype.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api.html#zope.contenttype.guess_content_type)
[07:45] <guruprasad> Afaics, Launchpadlib does not pass a value for 'content_type' when it is not provided and this is handled on the backend.
[08:14] <pieq> guruprasad: thanks!
[08:51] <guruprasad> pieq, you are welcome!
[12:10] <ricotz> hello :), is there an ETA for lgw01 builders being back online?
[12:19] <cjwatson> ricotz: they're intentionally offline and retained only for emergencies
[12:19] <cjwatson> lcy02 does seem to need a bit of attention right now, but I'd prefer to only enable lgw01 if lcy02 is entirely dead
[12:22] <cjwatson> (lgw01 is an older hardware generation; the datacentre it's in isn't quite marked for decommissioning yet, but we're generally trying to move stuff out of it where practical)
[12:25] <ricotz> cjwatson, hi, does lgw01 provide more RAM for a builder instance?
[12:25] <cjwatson> ricotz: no
[12:25] <cjwatson> lgw01 is *older* than lcy02 and less good in most ways, though as it happens the core count, RAM, and disk configurations are the same
[12:26] <ricotz> I am building libreoffice on impish which occasionally fails with a linker error, likely an OOM
[12:26] <cjwatson> then lgw01 will not help you
[12:26] <ricotz> but re-tries lately result in the same failure consistently :(
[12:26] <cjwatson> it would just be slower
[12:26] <ricotz> I see, could be less concurrent jobs
[12:27] <cjwatson> we've talked about upping builder RAM allocations to 16GiB across the board, but haven't done that yet (and need to ensure that it isn't going to cause any problems)
[12:28] <ricotz> I see, I was about to ask for some current specs
[12:28] <ricotz> so there are not special builders, like for the autopkgtests which more RAM
[12:31] <cjwatson> ricotz: No; that's difficult to arrange since for latency reasons we do the reset of a builder before we know what's going to be dispatched to it
[12:32] <cjwatson> And we don't at present maintain a "large" pool or something.  We may have to at some point, but that would be a chunk of complexity across the board so I want to resist that as long as possible
[12:33] <ricotz> thank you for the insights, I hoping the mentioned build succeeds at some point