brotherdust | Hi folks! Hope you are all well today! I'm trying to configure netplan to use an _interface_ route. Here's the /etc/network/interfaces equivalent: | 18:10 |
---|---|---|
brotherdust | auto enp196s0f0np0 | 18:10 |
brotherdust | iface enp196s0f0np0 inet static | 18:10 |
brotherdust | mtu 9216 | 18:10 |
brotherdust | address 172.16.1.3/24 | 18:10 |
brotherdust | pointopoint 172.16.1.2 | 18:10 |
brotherdust | And here's what seems to be the netplan equivalent: | 18:10 |
brotherdust | enp196s0f0np0: | 18:10 |
brotherdust | addresses: | 18:10 |
brotherdust | - 172.16.1.3/32 | 18:10 |
brotherdust | routes: | 18:10 |
brotherdust | - to: 172.16.1.1/32 | 18:10 |
brotherdust | on-link: true | 18:10 |
brotherdust | However, when I try to apply, I get this: | 18:10 |
brotherdust | unicast route must include both a 'to' and 'via' | 18:10 |
brotherdust | I tried adding a via to the configuration, and it applies, but the route is constructed improperly. Any thoughts on how to get the netplan to cooperate? | 18:10 |
brotherdust | In other words, doing this: | 18:12 |
brotherdust | enp196s0f0np0: | 18:12 |
brotherdust | addresses: | 18:12 |
brotherdust | - 172.16.1.3/32 | 18:12 |
brotherdust | routes: | 18:12 |
brotherdust | - to: 172.16.1.1/32 | 18:12 |
brotherdust | via: 172.16.1.1 | 18:12 |
brotherdust | on-link: true | 18:12 |
brotherdust | Results in this route entry: | 18:12 |
brotherdust | 172.16.1.1 via 172.16.1.1 dev enp196s0f0np0 proto static onlink | 18:12 |
brotherdust | Which is _not_ an interface route. It should look like this: | 18:12 |
brotherdust | 172.16.1.1 via dev enp196s0f0np0 | 18:12 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!