[09:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fenics-dolfinx [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1:0.3.0-13]
[09:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-12-cross-ports [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [1ubuntu1]
[09:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-12-cross-ports [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1ubuntu1]
[09:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-12-cross-ports [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [1ubuntu1]
=== CodeMouse92 is now known as Guest6719
[16:56] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-archive: Could we remove onetbb and numba from proposed? onetbb is just introducing too many regressions that I did not foresee.
[16:57] <Eickmeyer> also looking for a reject on show-in-file-manager because that one is missing a manpage. I have another upload of that which includes a manpage.
[22:39] <mwhudson> Eickmeyer / ubuntu-archive: if we're going to do this can we do this fairly soon? before the libtbb transition starts entangling in things
[23:08]  * RAOF has a look.
[23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected show-in-file-manager [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.1.4-0ubuntu1]
[23:12] <RAOF> Eickmeyer/mwhudson : Do we have a bug I should reference in the removal message?
[23:12] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: I don't (for onetbb and numba), but for show-in-file-manager I have a good version I'll upload right now.
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: show-in-file-manager (jammy-proposed/primary) [1.1.4-0ubuntu1]
[23:16] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: LP #1963842
[23:16] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1963842 in onetbb (Ubuntu) "Too many regressions for Jammy inclusion" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1963842
[23:18] <Eickmeyer> And show-in-file-manager is a required package to fix a bug in rapid-photo-downloader for Python 3.10 compatibility: #1963694
[23:19] <RAOF> And why are we removing numba? Is onetbb a dependency?
[23:22] <mwhudson> RAOF: numba depends on onetbb i thnk
[23:22] <tumbleweed> numba build-deps on onetbb
[23:23] <Eickmeyer> numba build-deps on onetbb, which includes a newer version of tbb than the old tbb package which still exists.
[23:23] <tumbleweed> looks like the numba build on riscv64 failed because of a missing recent onetbb build
[23:24] <Eickmeyer> Basically, the version of numba I uploaded (and you reviewed RAOF) requires onetbb for tbb > 2021.3
[23:24] <tumbleweed> we were assuming that we'd have to go without numba, because it didn't have python 3.10 support
[23:24] <tumbleweed> the support came in the nev version requiring modern tbb
[23:25] <RAOF> 👍️
[23:26] <Eickmeyer> Unfortunately, that newer tbb comes with a *lot* of regressions.
[23:29] <RAOF> Enjoy your new lack of modern tbb!
[23:30] <RAOF> (Both removed)
[23:30] <Eickmeyer> hehehe THanks RAOF!
[23:37] <mwhudson> RAOF: thanks