/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/03/11/#ubuntu-release.txt

rbasakOK. Well, I'm not going to complain if you don't :)00:02
dbungertI pinged the Debian maintainer, since that might help the debug of the Debian build failure00:04
rbasakGood idea - thanks00:05
rbasakdbungert: I don't know if you're aware of this thread: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-mysql-maint/2022-February/015631.html00:06
rbasakAlso https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-mysql-maint/2022-March/015657.html in the following month00:07
rbasakBut builds didn't pass, so I didn't sync at the time.00:07
dbungertah no, I really just picked this up trying to help the NBS openssl 1.1 crisis00:08
rbasakYour help is much appreciated :)00:08
dbungert:)00:08
rbasakThere has also been bug traffic to do with build flags on ppc64el and others. I don't know if you've seen all of that either. You probably don't need to unless you're curious.00:09
vorlonhnngh got micropython building on amd64, but it ftbfs on all other archs with various test failures not seen in Debian00:58
EickmeyerI, for the life of me, cannot figure out why csound is failing autopkgtests on s390x. *sigh*01:13
vorlonkc2bez[m]: hey so lubuntu-default-settings needs fixed to not depend on ttf-ubuntu-font-family; it also declares a Vcs-Git in debian/control that does not exist...01:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9 (impish-proposed/universe) [9.4.0-3ubuntu1 => 9.4.0-3ubuntu1.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)06:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9-cross (impish-proposed/universe) [26ubuntu2 => 26ubuntu2.1] (no packageset) (sync)06:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9 (focal-proposed/main) [9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04 => 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)06:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9-cross (focal-proposed/main) [21ubuntu5 => 21ubuntu6] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)06:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9 [sync] (impish-proposed) [9.4.0-3ubuntu1.1]08:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9-cross [sync] (impish-proposed) [26ubuntu2.1]08:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9 [sync] (focal-proposed) [9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04.1]08:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9-cross [sync] (focal-proposed) [21ubuntu6]08:22
kc2bezvorlon: sorry I missed this earlier. I will try to get that fixed up later today.09:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (impish-proposed/main) [2:4.13.17~dfsg-0ubuntu0.21.10.1 => 2:4.13.17~dfsg-0ubuntu0.21.10.2] (core, i386-whitelist)12:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (focal-proposed/main) [2:4.13.17~dfsg-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 => 2:4.13.17~dfsg-0ubuntu0.21.04.2] (core, i386-whitelist)12:35
slyonhey ubuntu-release! I'm wondering if it would be acceptable to upload a new bugfix release from the systemd-stable branch post feature freeze? (i.e. 249.11 that was released today: https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable/releases/tag/v249.11)15:06
seb128juliank, hey, did you see my autopkgtest question the other day?15:07
juliankseb128: I was thinking about it and then forgot15:11
seb128juliank, I would at least report it so we don't forget about it, what's the bug tracker for that infra?15:12
juliankseb128: we have auto-package-testing on LP and ADT on Jira, depending on your mood15:12
juliankI really look at Jira15:12
seb128wfm, let me add a card there15:12
juliankOne day people will come up with a new strategy to deal with bugs hopefully15:13
seb128juliank, In fact I don't seem to have the permissions needed to create a card on that board so I will go the LP way15:14
seb128juliank, reported as https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/196461815:24
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1964618 in Auto Package Testing "Possible to get migration-reference/0 result with proposed packages installed" [Undecided, New]15:24
vorlonkc2bez: no worries - I actually already uploaded the package, but it's the dangling VCS reference that concerned me, I don't know if there's somewhere you want me to land this change as an MP?16:21
vorlonslyon: "stable branch" doesn't give sufficient info to know whether this would be acceptable or not; please judge it yourself against the freeze criteria to decide whether it needs to go through a FFe process or not (and if it does need an exception, that should be done via launchpad bugs)16:22
slyonvorlon: ack. thanks16:23
rbasakdbungert, vorlon: otto has uploaded to sid now, without the ~exp label. Syncing would be a no-change rebuild. Worth doing? I think otto would be more comfortable with it being in sync since he's not familiar with the edge case handling, and he does maintain the stable releases for us. So just to smooth things over I'd like to re-sync if you're OK with that.16:26
dbungertrbasak: I think that's a great idea16:27
rbasak(might need to wait for LP to catch up with Debian though as he's only just uploaded)16:27
vorlonrbasak: no objections to syncing it; could we get the current version migrated first? (why are all the arm64 autopkgtests failed?)16:27
vorlonyeah you need at least 6 hours before it's published in Debian16:27
rbasak mariadb-test : Depends: mariadb-test-data (= 1:10.5.12-1build1) but 1:10.6.7-2ubuntu1 is to be installed16:29
rbasakLet me look into that quickly.16:29
vorlonjbicha: hey, so seb128 has filed LP: #1964618 about some misleading test results causing regressions to enter the release pocket; while it is appropriate to make the code more defensive, this is a corner case no one ever thought of needing to defend against.  If it hasn't already been said, do NOT trigger tests with both migration-reference/0 and all-proposed16:29
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1964618 in Auto Package Testing "Possible to get migration-reference/0 result with proposed packages installed" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196461816:29
vorlonjbicha: and there's the retry-autopkgtest-regressions command in lp:ubuntu-archive-tools which would make it more obvious that --no-proposed --all-proposed is nonsense16:30
jbichavorlon: yes, I discussed the issue with Seb earlier and I understand16:33
vorlonjbicha: ok thanks, just making sure16:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (impish-proposed/main) [0.103-0ubuntu7.2 => 0.104-0ubuntu2~21.10.1] (core)17:08
vorlonhuh kinda looking to me like the nzbget armhf binary is completely wrong for armhf17:55
vorlon-march=armv8[...]17:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: landscape-client (impish-proposed/main) [19.12-0ubuntu10 => 19.12-0ubuntu10.1] (ubuntu-server)18:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: landscape-client (focal-proposed/main) [19.12-0ubuntu4.2 => 19.12-0ubuntu4.3] (ubuntu-server)18:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: landscape-client (bionic-proposed/main) [18.01-0ubuntu3.5 => 18.01-0ubuntu3.6] (ubuntu-server)18:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~18.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)18:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~20.04.2] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)18:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (impish-proposed/main) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~21.10.1 => 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~21.10.2] (core, ubuntu-cloud)18:53
blackboxswbdmurray: the cloud-init regression we detected during SRU verification related to the Oracle datasource config merges has been reverted and we have queued a fix with only that commit into unapproved queue for proposed. Do you know if you will have time today to review that supplemental upload of 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~21.10.2 ?18:56
blackboxswfor bionic focal and impish18:56
bdmurraySure I can do that.18:57
blackboxswthanks a ton!18:57
bdmurrayblackboxsw: All I see in the diff is a change to the changelog19:08
blackboxswbdmurray: gb19:10
blackboxswchecking now19:10
blackboxswbdmurray: sure enough please reject will correct this19:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (impish-proposed) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~21.10.2]19:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~20.04.2]19:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~18.04.2]19:19
vorlonfyi python3.10 has been uploaded to (prospectively) enable PIE.  It's blocked in -proposed pending some additional benchmarking, but it should be filling the autopkgtest queues shortly20:19
sarnoldwoot, thanks vorlon :)20:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gramps (impish-backports/universe) [5.1.4-1~bpo21.10.1 => 5.1.5-1~bpo21.10.1] (no packageset)20:24
blackboxswhrm, I've definitely botched something uniquely bdmurray the upload I proposed to jammy also contained the same empty diff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/590178070/cloud-init_22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~22.04.1_22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~22.04.2.diff.gz20:25
vorlonconfigure:7077: error: size of time_t is 4, which is not large enough to fix the y2k38 bug20:30
vorlonhahahahaha20:30
sarnoldcute20:33
vorlonapparently Debian removed the armhf pdns-recursor binary rather than setting -D_TIME_BITS=64 <shrug>20:34
vorloneither way seems a silly thing for a DNS server in 2022 to be worrying about excessively20:35
sarnoldoh, my pals ;)20:37
sarnoldvorlon: https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/pull/10933  has the context in case you're curious :)20:41
ubottuPull 10933 in PowerDNS/pdns "m4: Enable 64-bit time_t on 32-bit systems with glibc-2.34" [Open]20:41
vorlongood good20:41
vorlonof course, my only interest in this particular package is NBS removal, so I'm not going to patch it20:42
sarnoldheh :(20:42
sarnoldit might be for the best, they maintain builds pretty well20:43
vorlonwhen the autopkgtests for a mediawiki theme take longer than those for slurm...20:52
vorlonkanashiro: do you know anything about ruby-bcrypt-pbkdf still depending on libruby2.7 in release? seems to be the last blocker for ruby2.7 removal20:55
vorlonoh you do know something as you've retriggered the autopkgtests several times ;)20:55
kanashirovorlon, this is the issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vagrant/+bug/196402520:56
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1964025 in ruby-net-ssh (Ubuntu) "Do not support OpenSSL 3" [Critical, In Progress]20:56
vorlonoho20:56
kanashiroI talked earlier today with schopin and I am working on it20:56
vorlonok cool20:56
vorlonadding a task for the affected package so it's findable from update_excuses20:57
kanashirowe need to migrate ruby-net-ssh to openssl 3 by our own basically, a big patch20:57
kanashirotrying to get some help from upstream as well20:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gramps (focal-backports/universe) [5.1.4-1~bpo20.04.1 => 5.1.5-1~bpo20.04.1] (edubuntu)20:57
kanashirotask for ruby-bcrypt-pbkdf added20:58
vorlonactually I'm also going to run a migration-proposed/0 test because I wonder if ruby-net-ssh is broken in release now that ruby3.0 has migrated20:59
vorlondoesn't change the priority of the bug but maybe we should just let ruby-bcrypt-pbkdf migrate20:59
kanashirovorlon, it is broken because openssl 3 is in the release pocket21:01
kanashirovagrant in the release pocket is also broken21:02
vorlonwell, previous baseline retest did succeed21:02
vorlonif this one fails, ruby-bcrypt-pbkdf will migrate21:02
kanashiromakes sense, thanks21:03
vorloncoreycb: subscribing you to LP: #1836142 which is still stalled because of reverse-dependencies of ceilometer in the archive; those need updated or someone needs to make a call that they should also be removed, and say so on the bug.21:31
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1836142 in python-ceilometerclient (Ubuntu) "[RM] python-ceilometerclient" [Medium, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/183614221:31
coreycbvorlon: thanks, I21:32
coreycbI'll take a look21:32
kc2bezvorlon: TYVM for uploading that. We have that in our phabricator instance. Don't worry about a MP, I will do a pull-lp-source and merge your changes in. I will make sure to get vcs updated before the next upload.22:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~18.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)22:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~20.04.2] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)22:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (impish-proposed/main) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~21.10.1 => 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~21.10.2] (core, ubuntu-cloud)22:38
=== ahayzen_ is now known as ahayzen
blackboxswI may have missed my window for review bdmurray, but I went back to the drawing board. Thx bryce for pointing out I had mangled my quilt 3.0 format  and not included any quilt patches. Thanks falcojr for review on those branches too.22:40
blackboxswcloud-init diffs should now actually contain the quilt patch22:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sndio [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.8.1-1.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)23:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sndio [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.8.1-1.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)23:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sndio [i386] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.8.1-1.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)23:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sndio [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.8.1-1.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)23:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sndio [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.8.1-1.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)23:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sndio [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.8.1-1.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)23:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sndio [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.1-1.1]23:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sndio [i386] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.1-1.1]23:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sndio [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.1-1.1]23:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sndio [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.1-1.1]23:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sndio [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.1-1.1]23:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sndio [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.1-1.1]23:17
vorlonyuck, mariadb-10.3 NBS binaries in jammy-proposed23:19
vorlonRikMills, LocutusOfBorg: why does akonadi depend on mariadb*-10.5 instead of the unversioned metapackages?23:24
vorlonkanashiro: yeah ruby-net-ssh is broken in release and ruby-bcrypt-pbkdf has migrated23:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sndio [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.8.1-1.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)23:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sndio [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.1-1.1]23:34

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!