[00:02] <rbasak> OK. Well, I'm not going to complain if you don't :)
[00:04] <dbungert> I pinged the Debian maintainer, since that might help the debug of the Debian build failure
[00:05] <rbasak> Good idea - thanks
[00:06] <rbasak> dbungert: I don't know if you're aware of this thread: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-mysql-maint/2022-February/015631.html
[00:07] <rbasak> Also https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-mysql-maint/2022-March/015657.html in the following month
[00:07] <rbasak> But builds didn't pass, so I didn't sync at the time.
[00:08] <dbungert> ah no, I really just picked this up trying to help the NBS openssl 1.1 crisis
[00:08] <rbasak> Your help is much appreciated :)
[00:08] <dbungert> :)
[00:09] <rbasak> There has also been bug traffic to do with build flags on ppc64el and others. I don't know if you've seen all of that either. You probably don't need to unless you're curious.
[00:58] <vorlon> hnngh got micropython building on amd64, but it ftbfs on all other archs with various test failures not seen in Debian
[01:13] <Eickmeyer> I, for the life of me, cannot figure out why csound is failing autopkgtests on s390x. *sigh*
[01:16] <vorlon> kc2bez[m]: hey so lubuntu-default-settings needs fixed to not depend on ttf-ubuntu-font-family; it also declares a Vcs-Git in debian/control that does not exist...
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9 (impish-proposed/universe) [9.4.0-3ubuntu1 => 9.4.0-3ubuntu1.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[06:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9-cross (impish-proposed/universe) [26ubuntu2 => 26ubuntu2.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[06:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9 (focal-proposed/main) [9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04 => 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9-cross (focal-proposed/main) [21ubuntu5 => 21ubuntu6] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[08:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9 [sync] (impish-proposed) [9.4.0-3ubuntu1.1]
[08:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9-cross [sync] (impish-proposed) [26ubuntu2.1]
[08:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9 [sync] (focal-proposed) [9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04.1]
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9-cross [sync] (focal-proposed) [21ubuntu6]
[09:09] <kc2bez> vorlon: sorry I missed this earlier. I will try to get that fixed up later today.
[12:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (impish-proposed/main) [2:4.13.17~dfsg-0ubuntu0.21.10.1 => 2:4.13.17~dfsg-0ubuntu0.21.10.2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (focal-proposed/main) [2:4.13.17~dfsg-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 => 2:4.13.17~dfsg-0ubuntu0.21.04.2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:06] <slyon> hey ubuntu-release! I'm wondering if it would be acceptable to upload a new bugfix release from the systemd-stable branch post feature freeze? (i.e. 249.11 that was released today: https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable/releases/tag/v249.11)
[15:07] <seb128> juliank, hey, did you see my autopkgtest question the other day?
[15:11] <juliank> seb128: I was thinking about it and then forgot
[15:12] <seb128> juliank, I would at least report it so we don't forget about it, what's the bug tracker for that infra?
[15:12] <juliank> seb128: we have auto-package-testing on LP and ADT on Jira, depending on your mood
[15:12] <juliank> I really look at Jira
[15:12] <seb128> wfm, let me add a card there
[15:13] <juliank> One day people will come up with a new strategy to deal with bugs hopefully
[15:14] <seb128> juliank, In fact I don't seem to have the permissions needed to create a card on that board so I will go the LP way
[15:24] <seb128> juliank, reported as https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/1964618
[16:21] <vorlon> kc2bez: no worries - I actually already uploaded the package, but it's the dangling VCS reference that concerned me, I don't know if there's somewhere you want me to land this change as an MP?
[16:22] <vorlon> slyon: "stable branch" doesn't give sufficient info to know whether this would be acceptable or not; please judge it yourself against the freeze criteria to decide whether it needs to go through a FFe process or not (and if it does need an exception, that should be done via launchpad bugs)
[16:23] <slyon> vorlon: ack. thanks
[16:26] <rbasak> dbungert, vorlon: otto has uploaded to sid now, without the ~exp label. Syncing would be a no-change rebuild. Worth doing? I think otto would be more comfortable with it being in sync since he's not familiar with the edge case handling, and he does maintain the stable releases for us. So just to smooth things over I'd like to re-sync if you're OK with that.
[16:27] <dbungert> rbasak: I think that's a great idea
[16:27] <rbasak> (might need to wait for LP to catch up with Debian though as he's only just uploaded)
[16:27] <vorlon> rbasak: no objections to syncing it; could we get the current version migrated first? (why are all the arm64 autopkgtests failed?)
[16:27] <vorlon> yeah you need at least 6 hours before it's published in Debian
[16:29] <rbasak>  mariadb-test : Depends: mariadb-test-data (= 1:10.5.12-1build1) but 1:10.6.7-2ubuntu1 is to be installed
[16:29] <rbasak> Let me look into that quickly.
[16:29] <vorlon> jbicha: hey, so seb128 has filed LP: #1964618 about some misleading test results causing regressions to enter the release pocket; while it is appropriate to make the code more defensive, this is a corner case no one ever thought of needing to defend against.  If it hasn't already been said, do NOT trigger tests with both migration-reference/0 and all-proposed
[16:30] <vorlon> jbicha: and there's the retry-autopkgtest-regressions command in lp:ubuntu-archive-tools which would make it more obvious that --no-proposed --all-proposed is nonsense
[16:33] <jbicha> vorlon: yes, I discussed the issue with Seb earlier and I understand
[16:34] <vorlon> jbicha: ok thanks, just making sure
[17:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (impish-proposed/main) [0.103-0ubuntu7.2 => 0.104-0ubuntu2~21.10.1] (core)
[17:55] <vorlon> huh kinda looking to me like the nzbget armhf binary is completely wrong for armhf
[17:55] <vorlon> -march=armv8[...]
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: landscape-client (impish-proposed/main) [19.12-0ubuntu10 => 19.12-0ubuntu10.1] (ubuntu-server)
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: landscape-client (focal-proposed/main) [19.12-0ubuntu4.2 => 19.12-0ubuntu4.3] (ubuntu-server)
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: landscape-client (bionic-proposed/main) [18.01-0ubuntu3.5 => 18.01-0ubuntu3.6] (ubuntu-server)
[18:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~18.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[18:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~20.04.2] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)
[18:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (impish-proposed/main) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~21.10.1 => 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~21.10.2] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[18:56] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: the cloud-init regression we detected during SRU verification related to the Oracle datasource config merges has been reverted and we have queued a fix with only that commit into unapproved queue for proposed. Do you know if you will have time today to review that supplemental upload of 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~21.10.2 ?
[18:56] <blackboxsw> for bionic focal and impish
[18:57] <bdmurray> Sure I can do that.
[18:57] <blackboxsw> thanks a ton!
[19:08] <bdmurray> blackboxsw: All I see in the diff is a change to the changelog
[19:10] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: gb
[19:10] <blackboxsw> checking now
[19:16] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: sure enough please reject will correct this
[19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (impish-proposed) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~21.10.2]
[19:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~20.04.2]
[19:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~18.04.2]
[20:19] <vorlon> fyi python3.10 has been uploaded to (prospectively) enable PIE.  It's blocked in -proposed pending some additional benchmarking, but it should be filling the autopkgtest queues shortly
[20:22] <sarnold> woot, thanks vorlon :)
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gramps (impish-backports/universe) [5.1.4-1~bpo21.10.1 => 5.1.5-1~bpo21.10.1] (no packageset)
[20:25] <blackboxsw> hrm, I've definitely botched something uniquely bdmurray the upload I proposed to jammy also contained the same empty diff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/590178070/cloud-init_22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~22.04.1_22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~22.04.2.diff.gz
[20:30] <vorlon> configure:7077: error: size of time_t is 4, which is not large enough to fix the y2k38 bug
[20:30] <vorlon> hahahahaha
[20:33] <sarnold> cute
[20:34] <vorlon> apparently Debian removed the armhf pdns-recursor binary rather than setting -D_TIME_BITS=64 <shrug>
[20:35] <vorlon> either way seems a silly thing for a DNS server in 2022 to be worrying about excessively
[20:37] <sarnold> oh, my pals ;)
[20:41] <sarnold> vorlon: https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/pull/10933  has the context in case you're curious :)
[20:41] <vorlon> good good
[20:42] <vorlon> of course, my only interest in this particular package is NBS removal, so I'm not going to patch it
[20:42] <sarnold> heh :(
[20:43] <sarnold> it might be for the best, they maintain builds pretty well
[20:52] <vorlon> when the autopkgtests for a mediawiki theme take longer than those for slurm...
[20:55] <vorlon> kanashiro: do you know anything about ruby-bcrypt-pbkdf still depending on libruby2.7 in release? seems to be the last blocker for ruby2.7 removal
[20:55] <vorlon> oh you do know something as you've retriggered the autopkgtests several times ;)
[20:56] <kanashiro> vorlon, this is the issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vagrant/+bug/1964025
[20:56] <vorlon> oho
[20:56] <kanashiro> I talked earlier today with schopin and I am working on it
[20:56] <vorlon> ok cool
[20:57] <vorlon> adding a task for the affected package so it's findable from update_excuses
[20:57] <kanashiro> we need to migrate ruby-net-ssh to openssl 3 by our own basically, a big patch
[20:57] <kanashiro> trying to get some help from upstream as well
[20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gramps (focal-backports/universe) [5.1.4-1~bpo20.04.1 => 5.1.5-1~bpo20.04.1] (edubuntu)
[20:58] <kanashiro> task for ruby-bcrypt-pbkdf added
[20:59] <vorlon> actually I'm also going to run a migration-proposed/0 test because I wonder if ruby-net-ssh is broken in release now that ruby3.0 has migrated
[20:59] <vorlon> doesn't change the priority of the bug but maybe we should just let ruby-bcrypt-pbkdf migrate
[21:01] <kanashiro> vorlon, it is broken because openssl 3 is in the release pocket
[21:02] <kanashiro> vagrant in the release pocket is also broken
[21:02] <vorlon> well, previous baseline retest did succeed
[21:02] <vorlon> if this one fails, ruby-bcrypt-pbkdf will migrate
[21:03] <kanashiro> makes sense, thanks
[21:31] <vorlon> coreycb: subscribing you to LP: #1836142 which is still stalled because of reverse-dependencies of ceilometer in the archive; those need updated or someone needs to make a call that they should also be removed, and say so on the bug.
[21:32] <coreycb> vorlon: thanks, I
[21:32] <coreycb> I'll take a look
[22:21] <kc2bez> vorlon: TYVM for uploading that. We have that in our phabricator instance. Don't worry about a MP, I will do a pull-lp-source and merge your changes in. I will make sure to get vcs updated before the next upload.
[22:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~18.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~20.04.2] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (impish-proposed/main) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~21.10.1 => 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~21.10.2] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[22:40] <blackboxsw> I may have missed my window for review bdmurray, but I went back to the drawing board. Thx bryce for pointing out I had mangled my quilt 3.0 format  and not included any quilt patches. Thanks falcojr for review on those branches too.
[22:40] <blackboxsw> cloud-init diffs should now actually contain the quilt patch
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sndio [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.8.1-1.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sndio [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.8.1-1.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sndio [i386] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.8.1-1.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sndio [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.8.1-1.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sndio [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.8.1-1.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sndio [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.8.1-1.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sndio [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.1-1.1]
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sndio [i386] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.1-1.1]
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sndio [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.1-1.1]
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sndio [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.1-1.1]
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sndio [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.1-1.1]
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sndio [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.1-1.1]
[23:19] <vorlon> yuck, mariadb-10.3 NBS binaries in jammy-proposed
[23:24] <vorlon> RikMills, LocutusOfBorg: why does akonadi depend on mariadb*-10.5 instead of the unversioned metapackages?
[23:29] <vorlon> kanashiro: yeah ruby-net-ssh is broken in release and ruby-bcrypt-pbkdf has migrated
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sndio [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.8.1-1.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[23:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sndio [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.1-1.1]