[00:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-bad1.0 [source] (focal-proposed) [1.16.3-0ubuntu1]
[00:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (focal-proposed) [1:0.9.0~0.20.04.6]
[00:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (impish-proposed) [1:0.9.2.4~0.21.10.1]
[01:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-github-containers-buildah [source] (impish-proposed) [1.21.3+ds1-1ubuntu1.1]
[02:04] <bdmurray> juliank: Can you delete my arm64 zlib test requests? It looks like jeremy requested them first.
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nullboot (jammy-proposed/primary) [0.2.1-0ubuntu1]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-rendering [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu1]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-rendering [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu1]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-rendering [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu1]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-rendering [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu1]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-rendering [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu1]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nullboot [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.2.1-0ubuntu1]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nullboot (jammy-proposed/primary) [0.2.1-0ubuntu1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nullboot [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.2.1-0ubuntu1]
[09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nullboot [arm64] (jammy-proposed/none) [0.2.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (focal-backports/universe) [1.20.5-1~bpo20.04.1 => 1.21.0-1~bpo20.04.1] (no packageset)
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nullboot [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [0.2.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nullboot [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.2.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nullboot [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [0.2.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fonts-fantasma [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.1+repack1-1]
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbbam [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.0+dfsg-2]
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbbam [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.0+dfsg-2]
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbbam [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.0+dfsg-2]
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbbam [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.0+dfsg-2]
[10:09] <sil2100> I need to go offline for a bit, but I'll be available for some archive-admin pings later today for a bit still o/
[10:29] <kotodama> hi! we've added SASL support to BIP IRC Proxy in just-released 0.9.3, Debian maintainer is triggering a build atm
[10:29] <kotodama> do you think 0.9.3 could make it to jammy ?
[10:30] <kotodama> I checked the schedule but I'm not sure in which category of freeze an IRC bouncer would fall into
[10:31] <kotodama> as Libera is requiring SASL auth from certain IP pools, it could be nice to include it in the next release
[10:33] <kotodama> (just got revamped 0.9.4 actually)
[10:58] <seb128> kotodama, hey, that sounds like a new feature so it would need to get an exception as documented on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeatureFreeze
[11:12] <paride> bdmurray, hi! I saw you merged https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/ubuntu-cdimage/mainline/revision/2006 yesterday but today I still receive an "image oversize" warning email. Does that script need to be updated on some machine?
[11:35] <kotodama> seb128: ah thanks, I'll check that then
[11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ignition-sensors [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ignition-gui [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [6.3.0+ds-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ignition-sensors [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ignition-gui [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [6.3.0+ds-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ignition-sensors [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ignition-gui [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [6.3.0+ds-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ignition-gui [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [6.3.0+ds-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ignition-sensors [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:58] <coreycb> RAOF: thanks for taking a look. yes, the user could still have a modified policy.json version in place that we disable. but, the method of using policy.json was deprecated in the prior release (I'll add a link to the bug if it's not there). I could also update the SRU to not move the policy.json if it exists and just stop generating it. that's an option.
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ignition-sensors [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ignition-gui [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [6.3.0+ds-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:46] <orndorffgrant> Hello release team. ubuntu-advantage-tools is hoping to release version 27.7 to all series including jammy soon. We have already gotten an initial review from paride, but would like a "pre-SRU" review before uploading to the proposed queue for all series. Will anyone on the SRU team have time to review this this week?
[13:46] <orndorffgrant> MP for jammy is here: https://code.launchpad.net/~orndorffgrant/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+git/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+merge/416678
[13:46] <orndorffgrant> The content will be the same for all series.
[13:46] <orndorffgrant> SRU Bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1964028
[13:46] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1964028 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Impish) "[SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.6 -> 27.7) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Impish" [Undecided, New]
[13:46] <orndorffgrant> And FFe bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1964134
[13:46] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1964134 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) "[FFe] ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.7" [Undecided, New]
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: manila (impish-proposed/universe) [1:13.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:13.0.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack)
[15:26] <bdmurray> paride: Yeah, I neglected to update the server. I've done that now.
[15:26] <paride> bdmurray, ty!
[16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-gui [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [6.3.0+ds-0ubuntu1]
[16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-gui [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [6.3.0+ds-0ubuntu1]
[16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-gui [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [6.3.0+ds-0ubuntu1]
[16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-sensors [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu1]
[16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-sensors [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu1]
[16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-gui [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [6.3.0+ds-0ubuntu1]
[16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-sensors [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu1]
[16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-sensors [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu1]
[16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-gui [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [6.3.0+ds-0ubuntu1]
[16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-sensors [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu1]
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (focal-proposed/main) [1:4.8.1-1ubuntu5.20.04.1 => 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu5.20.04.2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (bionic-proposed/main) [1:4.5-1ubuntu2.2 => 1:4.5-1ubuntu2.3] (core)
[20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemtap (focal-proposed/universe) [4.2-3 => 4.2-3ubuntu0.1] (i386-whitelist)
[20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemtap (impish-proposed/universe) [4.4-2 => 4.4-2ubuntu0.1] (i386-whitelist)
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glibc [source] (focal-proposed) [2.31-0ubuntu9.8]
[23:49] <RAOF> coreycb: Hm, but just not generating the policy.json file will result in upgrades breaking, right?
[23:50] <coreycb> RAOF: no, it just won't generate it for new installs
[23:50] <coreycb> it won't be removed on upgrade
[23:50] <RAOF> But isn't the problem that having the policy.json there breaks things?
[23:51] <coreycb> yes, that's the problem, but along the lines of your earlier comment, if a user has a policy.json that differs from the default, and upgrades, then it is not nice to remove it on them
[23:53] <RAOF> Right, but it's easy to remove the policy.json if it is unchanged.
[23:55] <coreycb> it probably won't be that easy because it is generated and could change from release to release
[23:56] <RAOF> But it's not generated on package install time, right?
[23:56] <RAOF> It's generated at package build time, and shipped in the package?
[23:57] <RAOF> At least that's how it looks from the rules, although I guess `pkgos_write_new_conf` could be doing strange things?
[23:58] <coreycb> that is correct, it is written at package build time. I think we can just fix this in the openstack charm to be honest and not deal with the SRU.