vorlonLocutusOfBorg: why are we syncing package-name-changing versions of cmark-gfm from Debian? (and doko, why are we accepting them?)00:03
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: ditto libosmorocer00:05
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, cmark and libosmocore were useful to make stunnel4 migrate01:52
LocutusOfBorgas well as pygments01:53
* LocutusOfBorg stops issuing rebuilds01:58
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: heh I think your process for issuing rebuilds could use some enhancement to detect ones already done :)04:23
vorlonI recommend https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/RKCF6H3KM which I will some day get published somewhere proper04:25
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
cpaelzerHi, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/needrestart/+bug/1965090 is looking for a ubuntu-release team FFE ack as well as a  Foundation-team POV review if this matches what you'd want07:06
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1965090 in needrestart (Ubuntu) "[FFe] updated needrestart (form git) for Jammy" [Undecided, In Progress]07:06
LocutusOfBorgsadly the paste doesn't work vorlon :)07:07
ricotzsil2100, good morning, libreoffice/impish is good to go :) - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/impish/+source/libreoffice/+bug/196327908:49
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1963279 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.2.6 for impish" [Undecided, New]08:49
fheimesDear ubuntu-release team, could you please drop/remove zlib 2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu8 from jammy-proposed (LP#1961427)?08:55
fheimesAn incompatibility with HTSlib was detected, I'm in contact with the initial reporter and author of the patch to get that solved, but this might take a while (hence I restart from scratch on this is probably best).08:55
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1961427 in zlib (Ubuntu Jammy) "zlib: compressBound() returns an incorrect result on z15" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196142708:55
sil2100ricotz: o/09:17
sil2100fheimes: hm, let me take a look09:17
cpaelzer(re-ping) Hi, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/needrestart/+bug/1965090 is looking for a ubuntu-release team FFE ack as well as a  Foundation-team POV review if this matches what you'd want09:21
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1965090 in needrestart (Ubuntu) "[FFe] updated needrestart (form git) for Jammy" [Undecided, In Progress]09:21
=== didrocks999 is now known as didrocks
sil2100cpaelzer: hey! Please set the bug to 'New' or 'Confirmed' before the FFe gets approved, we only look at those - since 'In Progress' means that someone already reviewed and gave a +1 on working on it09:35
sil2100fheimes: done o/09:44
cpaelzerthanks sil2100, set to confirmed10:13
cpaelzerit was "new" up to 3h ago, so we only had a 3h time this was in a bad state to be looked at :-)10:14
cpaelzerjust read your comment on the bug sil2100, thanks for carrying the needrestart case to the team10:20
cpaelzerFYI I have myself pinged internally last week but got no response10:20
waveformsil2100, I've attached the seed PRs I mentioned in stand-up to LP: #1947311 -- much appreciated if you can take a look at some point (they should be trivial, but it's seeds so ... you know!)10:25
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1947311 in ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "Unexpected partition growth on first boot on impish for raspberry pi" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194731110:25
fheimesthx sil210010:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam-ssh-agent-auth (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.10.3-1 => 0.10.3-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)11:43
toabctlsil2100, could you move livecd-rootfs from the focal queue to -proposed please?12:48
lucasmoura_Hi sil2100, thanks for reviewing our FFE for UA on Jammy, Since this is now approved, can also take a look on the release for the other series as well ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/196402813:02
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1964028 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Impish) "[SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.6 -> 27.7) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Impish" [Undecided, New]13:02
lucasmoura_We will only send the Jammy version into proposed after we are sure the release for the other series are fine, to avoid back and forth on the Jammy version of the package13:03
EickmeyerHi release team! If I could get a trivial "ack" on LP: #1965645 that would be wonderful. It probably doesn't even need a UIFe since it's merely graphical changes, but I'm just covering my bases. :)15:19
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1965645 in ubuntustudio-look (Ubuntu Jammy) "[UIFe] New Ubuntu Studio logo, additional wallpaper for Jammy" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196564515:19
sil2100Eickmeyer: ...aaand a fast ACK back to you!15:23
Eickmeyersil2100: Thanks!! :)15:23
kanashirocould anyone from the release team take a look at this FFe bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/196531216:03
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1965312 in fence-agents (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Add some agents to the -base binary package" [Undecided, New]16:03
bdmurrayparide: is bug 1961979 still important for our infrastructure?16:07
ubottuBug 1961979 in paramiko (Ubuntu Jammy) "Can't connect to Jammy hosts (openssh >= 8.8p1-1)" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196197916:07
paridebdmurray, yes it is, the Jammy ISO testing is only working because utah is using a paramiko version installed with pip16:09
bdmurrayparide: Is that something you might work on or should Foundations take it?16:09
paridebdmurray, my suggestion is to FFe paramiko >= 2.9.2 to Jammy, going ahead of Debian16:11
paridebdmurray, I'm not very familiar with the package, I think ideally it should be done by somebody that recently touched it16:12
paridebdmurray, which means Foundations :) The SRU tasks of that bug won't be easy to fix, but at least we have a way forward for our infra: upgrade our systems to Jammy once it's out16:13
parideI mean won't be easy to fix in a SRUable way16:13
parideand we backport stuff to -backports if needed16:13
paridebut I think the Jammy task should be fixed in a proper way16:14
schopinHello Release team! Would such changes count as "simple bugfix"? The dh compat bump annoys me a bit :/ https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006587#1016:22
ubottuDebian bug 1006587 in src:tcltls "tcltls: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0" [Important, Open]16:22
jawn-smithIs any release team member available for what should be a pretty simple FFE?17:09
jawn-smithbug 196558517:10
ubottuBug 1965585 in Ubuntu Image "FFE request: Add support for piboot to ubuntu-image" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196558517:10
bdmurrayjawn-smith: The tasks for that bug don't include an Ubuntu package. Is something missing?17:52
jawn-smithbdmurray: I filed the bug against the ubuntu-image project rather than the package. Is that not the correct way to do it? Does the package need to be added as well?17:54
bdmurrayjawn-smith: Will the deb be upated?17:55
jawn-smithbdmurray: yes17:55
bdmurrayOkay, then it should have a package task17:56
jawn-smithbdmurray: I switched it to the package rather than the project17:56
bdmurraykanashiro: Where are the automated tests mentioned in bug 1965312?18:06
ubottuBug 1965312 in fence-agents (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Add some agents to the -base binary package" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196531218:06
tewardubuntu-archive: Seems like cjwatson suggested we (backporters) poke you about this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965800    so we can figure out how/where this should be fixed.  This is related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965758 which is a debhelper backport request, as it depends on debugedit which is disabled / not available for i386 because it's partial-arch and not full18:23
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1965800 in debugedit (Ubuntu) "debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency)" [Undecided, New]18:23
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1965758 in debhelper (Ubuntu Impish) "[BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish" [Undecided, New]18:23
tewardi believe debhelper was supposed to allow debhelper to install in all archs, so this might just be an oversight, but still18:24
kanashirobdmurray, the tests are defined here: https://github.com/canonical/server-test-scripts/tree/main/ha/virsh18:42
kanashiroand they are running in our internal jenkins instance18:42
bdmurraykanashiro: ack, thanks18:44
jawn-smithbdmurray: thanks for reviewing that bug!18:47
kanashirobdmurray, thanks for the approval19:19
seb128teward, newer series have a split debugedit source, I don't have the free slots to investigate if building rpm on i386 on focal is what we want, maybe try to check with vorlon19:41
teward*throws this on vorlon's plate*19:58
seb128well, he's the one who designed the partial architecture solution and maintained the list of exceptions afaik20:02
seb128I'm fine adding obvious candidates there but rpm doesn't feel like one20:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (impish-proposed/main) [2021e-0ubuntu0.21.10 => 2022a-0ubuntu0.21.10] (core)20:06
tewardseb128: if there's an alternate split-series for debugedit that we can (backport?) then that may be the solution, but this only came up because of the debhelper backport, and they wanted to have it inquired with AAs about potential solutions20:11
seb128right, I understand the issue, I just don't feel like I'm in a position to decide if rpm is something we should start building on i386, I didn't even check the (build-)depends to see what else would be needed for it to build there20:12
seb128how difficult would be to remove that depends of the debhelper update if maybe that's another option?20:13
coreycbit looks like sshuttle is broken in jammy and fixed in unstable: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=100315420:25
ubottuDebian bug 1003154 in sshuttle "ssh -T possibly needed" [Important, Open]20:25
coreycbthe only reverse dependency is sshoot which is in sync between jammy and unstable20:29
coreycbubuntu-archive: I can upload a merge for sshuttle to jammy if there are no objections20:37
vorlonteward: my recollection is that rpm on i386 was going to be a very bad idea; I would rather see debugedit pick up the changes from later series, if that's what you need20:38
tewardseb128: removing the dep would be question for waveform (on LP) because I don't know enough about the dependencies.  paride might know more.20:39
bdmurraycoreycb: that's a question for ubuntu-release and seeing a debdiff would help us make an informed decision20:42
coreycbbdmurray: thanks. it's a new release so there are a decent number of changes. maybe I should just look for a patch to pick.20:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (focal-proposed/main) [2021e-0ubuntu0.20.04 => 2022a-0ubuntu0.20.04] (core)20:45
bdmurraycoreycb: That's probably best given where we are in the release process20:45
coreycbbdmurray: ok I'll look into it20:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (bionic-proposed/main) [2021e-0ubuntu0.18.04 => 2022a-0ubuntu0.18.04] (core)20:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!