[01:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-prime [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.16~0.20.04.2]
[01:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-prime [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.16~0.20.04.2]
[06:36] <cpaelzer> coreycb: I think you wanted to ping ubuntu-release for sshuttle not u_buntu-archive
[06:36] <cpaelzer> coreycb: looking at https://github.com/sshuttle/sshuttle/releases/ it seems you might want to do either a full FFe with the release team OR do a pure bug-fix
[06:37] <cpaelzer> coreycb: the latter would seem like https://github.com/sshuttle/sshuttle/pull/712 + https://github.com/sshuttle/sshuttle/pull/668
[06:38] <cpaelzer> coreycb: and the latter would not even need an FFe or anything like it atm
[08:06] <vorlon`> is someone restarting the failing pandoc/riscv64 build in a loop?
[08:22] <LocutusOfBorg> I restarted it once, two days ago, because it was failed with no log
[08:22] <LocutusOfBorg> as well as some other armhf/arm64/ppc64el (bos2 was down)
[08:25] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: ok. it's restarted at least twice today, and I also didn't notice any failure emails; maybe it's some automated launchpad thing
[08:26] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll keep an eye on it
[08:26] <vorlon> cheers
[08:30] <mardy> RAOF: hi! Sorry for the ping, I just wanted to make sure whether there's anything else we should do on our side to progress on this SRU bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1959375
[08:33] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: so is the osmo-pcu/s390x autopkgtest failure a big-endian regression in libosmocore...
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.15]
[08:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (impish-proposed) [2022a-0ubuntu0.21.10]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (focal-proposed) [2022a-0ubuntu0.20.04]
[08:54] <vorlon> temporarily rolling back openbsc in -proposed, to build the version that's compatible with the libosmo-netif in Ubuntu
[09:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (bionic-proposed) [2022a-0ubuntu0.18.04]
[09:16] <ricotz> sil2100, hello :), are there any issues with libreoffice/impish to be accepted into -updates?
[09:17] <sil2100> ricotz: hello! Didn't check, possibly not! I didn't manage to do my SRU shift yesterday - let me take a look now
[09:22] <toabctl> sil2100, hey. is there a reason why livecd-rootfs can not be added from the queue to proposed (for focal) ? I'm waiting for that since over a week and currently the Anbox builds are broken and need that change
[09:23] <sil2100> toabctl: will look in a moment as well!
[09:23] <toabctl> sil2100, thanks a lot!
[09:29] <ricotz> sil2100, ah I see, thank you
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.41]
[13:15] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, failed again with no log
[13:19] <seb128> worth asking on #launchpad maybe?
[13:19] <cjwatson> "failed with no log" -> builder crashed, just retry it
[13:20] <cjwatson> I already noticed some weird errors on riscv64 earlier today so I was starting on some reflashing anyway
[13:21] <cjwatson> Maybe I'll just put them all on manual and re-auto them as I reflash them
[13:24] <seb128> cjwatson, reading the backlog it seems it was already retried because the build failed a first time with no log so maybe a real issue behind?
[13:24] <seb128> or the builders are in a weird state as you said, let's see if your poking works
[13:25] <cjwatson> Reflashing rarely hurts, certainly
[15:18] <bdmurray> I retried glibc for focal on riscv5 yesterday and it failed with no log so I've tried again now
[15:19] <bdmurray> mardy: I'll have a look at shadow today
[16:32] <mardy> bdmurray: thanks!!
[16:36] <holmanb> bdmurray: We have attached all testing logs to the LP release bug and I just set tags to verification-done for cloud-init 22.1 release: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1961446
[17:36] <schopin> Could a good soul upload a rebuild of libnet-ssleay-perl against the new openssl 3.0.2 ? It apparently has strict checks against the OpenSSL version number. TIA
[17:51] <mdeslaur> schopin: sure, one sec
[17:53] <schopin> Oh, I asked on the wrong channel! Thanks anyway mdeslaur :)
[18:02] <mdeslaur> schopin: done
[18:07] <schopin> thx
[19:16] <Eickmeyer> Image building for the Ubuntu Studio images is getting some weird errors, not size related, not sure why this is happening. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntustudio/jammy/dvd-20220322.2.log
[19:17] <Eickmeyer> A syntax error, it seems.
[19:17] <Eickmeyer> cjwatson: I hate to bug you, but ^ ?
[19:19] <sil2100> Hey
[19:19] <sil2100> Eickmeyer, cjwatson: don't worry, it's fixed now!
[19:19] <sil2100> Typo on my side, sorry
[19:20] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: Awesome, thanks. Any chance you can trigger a rebuild so we have something?
[19:20] <Eickmeyer> (I'm guessing it was a missing semicolon)
[19:21] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: let me trigger one after my test run of the riscv images finishes - I'll know then that everything is still in order
[19:21] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: Ok, thanks. :)
[19:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (impish-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu71 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu71.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (focal-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.22] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:47] <sil2100> ...is the isotracker down?
[19:49] <sil2100> Now all builds are failing because of that...
[19:50] <Eickmeyer> oof
[19:50] <Eickmeyer> I didn't see the isotracker as being down, but it stands to reason.
[19:51] <Eickmeyer> Yep, confirmed, isotracker down.
[19:51] <Eickmeyer> Timed out.
[20:02] <sil2100> grrr
[20:24] <Eickmeyer> 🤦
[20:38] <Eickmeyer> Yay! It's back!
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shadow [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.8.1-1ubuntu5.20.04.2]
[20:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shadow [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:4.5-1ubuntu2.3]
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxc [source] (impish-proposed) [1:4.0.12-0ubuntu1~21.10.1]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxc [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.0.12-0ubuntu1~20.04.1]
[21:10] <lucasmoura> Hi @RAOF, we have recently discovered an issue on release 27.7 of ubuntu-advantage-tools. I have addressed the issue on the new MRs and have emailed you the right branches to review. Let us know if we need to provide you any additional information for this SRU
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted landscape-client [source] (impish-proposed) [19.12-0ubuntu10.1]
[21:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted landscape-client [source] (focal-proposed) [19.12-0ubuntu4.3]
[21:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted landscape-client [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.01-0ubuntu3.6]
[21:30] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: ISO tracker is back up, but it won't let me retrigger a rebuild unless the last build was successful.
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemtap [source] (impish-proposed) [4.4-2ubuntu0.1]
[21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemtap [source] (focal-proposed) [4.2-3ubuntu0.1]
[21:33] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: running one now!
[21:34] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: Thanks! :)
[21:45] <bdmurray> mdeslaur: The SRU fixes for pam-ssh-agent-auth look different than that is in Jammy (I guess because of the sequence of events). Are there plans to update Jammy with the same patch?
[21:47] <mdeslaur> bdmurray: the only difference is the SRUs have the two patches combined into a single one
[21:48] <mdeslaur> bdmurray: I can certainly replace the two patches with a single one if you think it's worth doing
[21:49] <bdmurray> mdeslaur: No, that sounds silly thanks for the clarification
[21:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam-ssh-agent-auth [source] (impish-proposed) [0.10.3-3ubuntu1.21.10.1]
[21:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam-ssh-agent-auth [source] (focal-proposed) [0.10.3-3ubuntu1.20.04.1]
[21:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam-ssh-agent-auth [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.10.3-1ubuntu0.1]
[22:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (impish-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu71.1]
[22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.22]
[22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evdi [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9.1-1ubuntu4~20.04.2]
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.58]