[15:00] <mclemenceau> o/
[15:00] <ginggs> o/
[15:00] <bdmurray> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team
[15:00] <meetingology> Meeting started at 15:00:41 UTC.  The chair is bdmurray.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
[15:00] <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
[15:00] <bdmurray> #topic Lightning Round
[15:01] <bdmurray> So this week we are testing out posting our lightning round / status update in https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-23-march-2022/27297/2
[15:02] <bdmurray> Let's take a minute to review them and give an opportunity for questions
[15:03] <bdmurray> schopin: you also uploaded python-pecan for enr0n or you tried to and it didn't work?
[15:03] <schopin> Tried, it was rejected :)
[15:04] <bdmurray> I see multiple people voting for the DMB, good!
[15:04] <schopin> Let's put that on the pile of the reasons for me to get core dev :)
[15:04] <bdmurray> It looks like enr0n still needs some packages spnosored
[15:04] <bdmurray> Could somebody help with that?
[15:04] <jawn-smith> o/
[15:05] <bdmurray> Thanks
[15:05] <enr0n> jawn-smith: thanks!
[15:05] <schopin> jawn-smith: if there are too many you can send a couple my way.
[15:05] <jawn-smith> I was waiting to see if any non-foundations people would pick them up but I can sponsor them if we think it's been long enough
[15:06] <jawn-smith> or schopin and I can split them
[15:06] <bdmurray> Given where we are in the release cycle we should just get them done.
[15:06] <jawn-smith> makes sense
[15:06] <bdmurray> okay, lets move on
[15:06] <bdmurray> #topic Release Incoming Bugs
[15:07] <bdmurray> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:08] <bdmurray> bug 1779645
[15:09] <bdmurray> Given that this is a universe package now I think we should pass on it
[15:09] <bdmurray> But think about what we can do for rls-kk
[15:10] <bdmurray> bug 1965805
[15:10] <bdmurray> that looks like it is in hand
[15:11] <bdmurray> bug 1923052 is still incomplete so when we are doing ISO testing if people could keep an eye out for it that would be useful
[15:11] <bdmurray> bug 1958720 is still server-tood
[15:11] <bdmurray> server-todo
[15:12] <bdmurray> bug 1962751 sil2100 tested and wasn't able to recreate it so we'll leave it until we get more information
[15:12] <bdmurray> bug 1947588 schopin do you have an update for us?
[15:13] <schopin> no, it slipped through the cracks. COuld we maybe card it ?
[15:14] <mclemenceau> Ok, done!
[15:14] <bdmurray> bug 1068591
[15:14] <bdmurray> didn't somebody say they ran into this?
[15:14] <bdmurray> schopin: ?
[15:14] <schopin> I did, yes.
[15:15] <schopin> It made for a miserable time upgrading after the fact...
[15:15] <bdmurray> So should the upgrader deactivate or just warn?
[15:15] <schopin> A warning should be enough.
[15:15] <bdmurray> Or some combination of the two?
[15:16] <schopin> IMO if you're doing pinning you should be able to do the right thing.
[15:16] <bdmurray> Okay, let's card that but maybe also think about looking at log files to see how many people are affected.
[15:16] <bdmurray> bug 1892369 there is a patch there
[15:18] <bdmurray> Is there somebody somewhat familiar with casper who could review the diff?
[15:18] <bdmurray> We should target and card that though.
[15:19] <bdmurray> Okay, I'll look at it.
[15:20] <bdmurray> bug 1962454 rather than card it lets just leave it here
[15:20] <bdmurray> bug 1956835
[15:21] <bdmurray> juliank you know a bit about zsys right?
[15:21] <juliank> not really
[15:22] <juliank> definitely reassign there
[15:24] <jawn-smith> I'll investigate configs to limit the number of boot snapshots
[15:24] <bdmurray> Okay we'll switch the package task to zsys
[15:25] <bdmurray> bug 1965983
[15:25] <bdmurray> juliank: this looks like something for you to review
[15:26] <bdmurray> let's target and card it since there is a patch
[15:26] <juliank> I don't really look at zfs stuff, that's all desktop's code
[15:28] <bdmurray> Okay so even though it is grub we should have the desktop team look at it?
[15:28] <juliank> I can merge it but not really test it
[15:28] <juliank> But I guess Adam did the testing, so meh
[15:30] <bdmurray> Okay, so lets go back to the original plan and card it
[15:30] <mclemenceau> ok, carded
[15:30] <bdmurray> bug 574287 we'll punt to rls-kk
[15:31] <bdmurray> bug 1965652 - this is the bug enr0n has encounter right?
[15:31] <enr0n> yes it is
[15:31] <bdmurray> and you've indicated it happens all the time?
[15:32] <enr0n> Yeah, I haven't tried in a week or so, but it was then. I can investigate furhter
[15:32] <bdmurray> Well I gather the desktop team wants the .crash file from gnome-shell
[15:32] <bdmurray> So if you could that would be great
[15:32] <bdmurray> Let's not card it though
[15:32] <enr0n> Ack.
[15:32] <bdmurray> bug 1965830
[15:33] <bdmurray> I suspect this is similar to the Kubuntu fix I uploaded for ubiquity the other day
[15:33] <bdmurray> Let's taget and card that
[15:34] <bdmurray> rls-ii-incoming is empty
[15:34] <bdmurray> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:34] <bdmurray> bug 1960089 is still on me
[15:34] <bdmurray> and we already talked about bug 1965983
[15:34] <bdmurray> moving on
[15:35] <bdmurray> #topic Team proposed-migration report
[15:35] <jawn-smith> o/
[15:35] <jawn-smith> Beta is 1 week from today
[15:35] <schopin> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs
[15:35] <jawn-smith> so we should try to resolve as many of these as possible
[15:35] <jawn-smith> up first is boost1.74
[15:36] <jawn-smith> ginggs has retried some of these tests and they are still running
[15:36] <jawn-smith> ginggs: you're looking at yade, are there any boost1.74 related regressions that you think need to be looked at?
[15:37] <ginggs> jawn-smith: i'll look at all of the boost regressions, and numpy, seeing it's also yade
[15:37] <jawn-smith> great, thanks!
[15:37] <jawn-smith> gpgme1.0 is FTBFS on all architectures. Anyone want to volunteer for that?
[15:38] <alexghiti> o/
[15:38] <jawn-smith> someone apparently restarted builds in the last few minutes
[15:38] <jawn-smith> pillow, any takers?
[15:38] <doko> I'll look at pillow
[15:38] <jawn-smith> thanks doko!
[15:39] <jawn-smith> libselinux is blocked by systemd
[15:39] <jawn-smith> enr0n will look at systemd
[15:39] <enr0n> Ack
[15:40] <jawn-smith> enr0n: does that include the linux-meta-raspi issue?
[15:40] <enr0n> Yeah, but from quick look that just needs a retry. Lots of ssh failures
[15:40] <jawn-smith> lmk when you need retries clicked
[15:40] <jawn-smith> gcc-12 is doko I'm assuming?
[15:41] <jawn-smith> openssl is not that old but should be looked at this close to release
[15:42] <jawn-smith> schopin is out for a while, so let's divide up the regressions
[15:42] <jawn-smith> I'll retry the arm tests
[15:43] <jawn-smith> r-cran-openssl, any takers?
[15:43] <jawn-smith> oh the arm tests look like actual failures.
[15:43] <jawn-smith> I'll take kopanocore
[15:43] <jawn-smith> any nagios experts?
[15:44] <jawn-smith> ogayot will take pexpect
[15:44] <jawn-smith> dbungert will take nagios-plugins-contrib
[15:44] <dbungert> ack
[15:45] <jawn-smith> xypron: can you take a look at r-cra-openssl?
[15:45] <jawn-smith> r-cran-openssl
[15:45] <jawn-smith> enr0n: would you like to look at stunnel and swupdate together?
[15:46] <enr0n> Yeah I can do that
[15:46] <jawn-smith> I'll restart the pam regressions
[15:46] <jawn-smith> and that's it for proposed migration
[15:46] <jawn-smith> back to you bdmurray
[15:46] <bdmurray> thanks jawn-smith
[15:46] <bdmurray> #topic AOB
[15:46] <doko> ftbfs
[15:47] <doko> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/592787164/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy-amd64.pillow_9.0.1-1build1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[15:47] <doko> oops
[15:47] <doko> https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20220317-jammy-jammy.html#foundations-bugs-team
[15:50] <bdmurray> There has been some discussion about builds failing with no log file
[15:50] <bdmurray> And how to represent that in the report
[15:51] <doko> acpi-support: ?
[15:51] <bdmurray> I'll take that one
[15:52] <doko> gpgme1.0: ?
[15:52] <jawn-smith> gpgme1.0 is with alexghiti
[15:53] <jawn-smith> I'll take vim
[15:53] <doko> that's it
[15:53] <bdmurray> thanks doko
[15:53] <bdmurray> Keep in mind the Beta is next week and we may need help with ISO testing
[15:53] <juliank> I also have cool build failures for the ppc64el baseline rebuild in https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4812/+packages
[15:54] <juliank> But they might not be our packages
[15:54] <juliank> lots of desktop stuff unfortunately
[15:55] <bdmurray> Okay, thanks everybody!
[15:55] <bdmurray> #endmeeting
[15:55] <meetingology> Meeting ended at 15:55:17 UTC.  Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-03-24-15.00.moin.txt