EickmeyerRelease team: I'm a little perplexed as to why we had Ubuntu Studio images build at 4.1GB but now they're 4.0 and suddently oversized? Last I checked only the squashfs had a cap of 4.0GB. Now I'm frantically working to remove *even more*. What changed?04:31
tarzeauEickmeyer: remember my font post? basically this: https://github.com/alexmyczko/autoexec.bat/blob/master/Documents/ubuntu.md05:51
tarzeaui didn't check the actual images, but that frees quite some space without (imho) any loss05:51
tarzeaui also like some things at https://wiki.debian.org/ReduceDebian (one thing i didn't add there though is rebuilding packages optimized for size) - if you're interested ping me05:52
vorlonEickmeyer: 'OVERSIZED' refers to the image exceeding the configured maximum size for the flavor's image and can always be bumped by agreement between the flavor team and the release team.  For this specific case, I will note that Ubuntu Studio is declared to produce DVD images and the latest image will not fit on a DVD06:02
vorlonthat is different from the size limit on files within the ISO filesystem06:02
vorlonif you want to bump the limit, you can, but I think that means at some point soon we should evaluate not building Ubuntu Studio as a hybrid image since it would no longer be practical to use it on optical media06:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-ucm-conf (focal-proposed/main) [1.2.2-1ubuntu0.12 => 1.2.2-1ubuntu0.13] (no packageset)08:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (impish-proposed/main) [248.3-1ubuntu8.2 => 248.3-1ubuntu8.4] (core, i386-whitelist)09:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (focal-proposed/main) [245.4-4ubuntu3.15 => 245.4-4ubuntu3.16] (core, i386-whitelist)09:33
RikMillswhat is up with the ISO images? I have a .img and a .iso and the .iso is out of date10:17
juliankRikMills: image was switched from hybrid to usb image?10:49
RikMillsjuliank: this was intended? the ISO tracker has no idea it has changed10:51
juliankI don't know10:51
fossfreedomAh. I thought it was UB that had new vs old dates. Reproducible at least.10:53
juliankgod I hate bileto10:54
fossfreedomOn a related track today's ubuntu jammy daily failed with a libboost dependency issue. Known issue?10:54
juliankI can't publish https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4810/+packages as it has a couple riscv64 build failures (duh)10:55
juliankand one package is still building there10:55
juliankthose are not going to be worked on10:55
julianklike yikes, those are not regressions10:55
juliankI removed packages superseded in the archive, and bileto now complains they are "ready to build"10:56
juliankI'm as happy with where the ppa is at as I'm going to get, sighh10:58
juliankSo I guess I can manually copy-package -b the packages in there to the archive11:00
juliankit worked for fbset11:01
juliankbut yikes11:01
juliankdoing manual copying now11:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed ruby-minitest from i386-whitelist in jammy11:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed ruby-power-assert from i386-whitelist in jammy11:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed ruby-test-unit from i386-whitelist in jammy11:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nose to i386-whitelist in jammy11:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-asgiref to i386-whitelist in jammy11:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-unicodedata2 to i386-whitelist in jammy11:06
Ukikiefossfreedom: Yeah seems jammy has been failing...11:13
juliankFirst ~150 uploads for ppc64el landed12:33
juliank* ppc64el baseline bump12:33
juliankAnother 150 are queued in bileto 4813 and building (or failing to) :D12:34
juliankabout 300 more remain after that12:34
juliankautopkgtest queues to go boooom12:35
juliankWhat I'm going to do once those are built is filter out the build failures into bileto 4812 and copy the successes over to the main archive12:36
juliankGetting the "easy" stuff out of the way and the queues up12:37
juliankah it seems arm64 autopkgtest cloud is dying again12:38
ahasenack<VirtSubproc>: failure: Timed out on waiting for ssh connection12:43
juliankit happens12:44
juliankarm64 doesn't always manage to boot12:44
juliankbecause the host qemu crashes12:44
juliankthere's an RT ticket for it12:45
ahasenackI guess I should refrain from trying again for a while?12:45
ahasenackthis was wireguard12:45
ahasenackyesterday arm64 was the only red (hence my retry), but today all are red with that ssh error12:45
juliankqueues are full-ish anyhow12:45
ahasenackoh, all are arm64 indeed12:46
ahasenackI meant the other packages were green, just wireguard/arm64 was red12:46
juliankthis really shouldn't be a failure12:46
lucasmouraHi @bdmurray, @RAOF has approved our SRU for UA version 27.7. @paride has already upload those packages in the proposed queue, but we need an SRU reviewer to approve the upload. If you have some time, can you please take a look on that ?13:11
lucasmouraIt will unblock our tests for the package13:11
Eickmeyer[m]vorlon: Good morning! I guess I was worried because the .iso images were merely copies of what was created on March 22nd and weren't being updated. I thought this was a result of the oversize.14:27
Eickmeyer[m]Either way, we have discussed no longer encouraging optical media since most computers produced don't even have an optical drive anymore.14:29
schopinWas there a conclusion to this discussion though?14:31
lucasmoura@apw (now) @bdmurray (later) @RAOF (even later): sorry for pinging again, but I just realized that if we don't upload the new UA package to proposed today, it will delay our release a lot14:37
Eickmeyer[m]schopin: This was an Ubuntu Studio discussion, didn't really occur anywhere else.14:38
lucasmouraWe would like to finish our test early next week and finish the process by the end of the week, so we can deliver the package before the jammy freeze14:38
apwlucasmoura, which series is that for ?14:38
Eickmeyer[m]At least, not to my knowledge.14:38
lucasmoura@apw, xenial, bionic, focal and impish14:39
lucasmouraThe package are already on the proposed queue and @RAOF has already approved the SRU14:39
schopinEickmeyer[m]: I might be thinking of another discussion regarding optical media support in Ubuntu in general, but I can't find it in my email archive :/14:39
lucasmouraI think we just the need the approval for the upload14:39
apwlucasmoura, yes, but this is a monumental change; i assume you have an SRU exception for this package?14:54
lucasmouraapw, yes we do have an SRU exception for it: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuAdvantageToolsUpdates14:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python3.10 [amd64] (jammy-proposed/main) [3.10.4-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)15:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python3.10 [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [3.10.4-1ubuntu1]15:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python3.10 [i386] (jammy-proposed/main) [3.10.4-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)15:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python3.10 [i386] (jammy-proposed) [3.10.4-1ubuntu1]15:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (impish-proposed) [27.7~21.10.1]15:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [27.7~20.04.1]15:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [27.7~18.04.1]15:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [27.7~16.04.1]15:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (bionic-proposed/restricted) [390.144-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 390.147-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-desktop)15:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (impish-proposed/restricted) [390.144-0ubuntu2 => 390.147-0ubuntu0.21.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist, kernel-dkms)15:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (focal-proposed/restricted) [390.144-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 390.147-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist, kernel-dkms)15:49
schopinCould a member of the release team have a look at this FFE? LP: #196620016:04
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1966200 in rustc (Ubuntu) "[FFe] rustc: Downgrade cargo from Recommends to Suggests" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196620016:04
vorlonEickmeyer[m]: ok, I hadn't noticed that the previous images were being copied forward.  If no one else has, I'll take a quick look today16:39
Eickmeyer[m]vorlon: RikMills suspects it's related to sil2100's work on risc, but we don't know for sure.16:45
Eickmeyer[m]And it's affecting everyone.16:45
=== lucasmoura_ is now known as lucasmoura
lucasmouraapw, sorry to ping again, but please let me know if you need any more context on UA or this specific release. I can provide you with that. And the ping is just to justify our concern if the packages are not on proposed today regarding the jammy freeze17:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~18.04.2 => 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~18.04.3] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)17:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~20.04.2 => 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~20.04.3] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (impish-proposed/main) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~21.10.2 => 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~21.10.3] (core, ubuntu-cloud)17:28
bdmurraylucasmoura: what do the SRUs have to do with jammy freezing?17:35
bdmurray27.7 is already in Jammy17:37
lucasmourabdmurray, the SRUs for older release don't have a direct influence, but we are delivering the same content on all releases here. Our concern is if we do identify a problem on one of the tests we perform for the packages, we would need to fix that on Jammy as well and that may happen after the freeze and turn it on a 0-day SRU17:38
lucasmouraWe have already performed most of our test for the package we are delivering, so we should be fine, but it could still happen17:38
lucasmourabdmurray, just saw that it is on Jammy proposed. I was assuming that it would not go there automatically, but fair enough if that happen, we could deliver a fix, which I am assuming doesn't need a FFE17:39
lucasmouraAnd just saw that the packages the other packages are on the proposed pocket already. Thanks for that apw and sorry for all the pings here today17:40
bdmurraylucasmoura: its actually in the release pocket for jammy17:40
lucasmourabdmurray, Yes, my mistake, I meant to say it on release already17:41
lucasmouraJust to confirm, on the devel-release that process from proposed to release happens automatically then ?17:42
bdmurrayProvided nothing breaks it will get automatically promoted - yes17:42
lucasmouraOkay, got it. Sorry for the confusion here17:43
blackboxswhi SRU vanguards, I believe rbasak is out today,  we have a regression-updates hotfix that needs review for cloud-init that is a single cherry pick into bionic, focal and impish -proposed testing for cloud-init to unblock snappy and desktop canary installer work. https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/196608518:12
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1966085 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Impish) "cloud-init status --wait never returns if datasource not found" [Undecided, In Progress]18:12
blackboxswWe have already released to Jammy earlier today with the changeset and snappy has also applied this changeset to their test environments confirming the fix works for them as well. We'd like a vanguard to review these unapproved uploaded into B F and I so we can execute a specific test plan for this bug fix18:13
bdmurrayblackboxsw: stand by18:14
blackboxswbdmurray: thanks18:14
bdmurrayblackboxsw: I'm rejecting it due to no Launchpad bugs being fixed in the changelog18:16
blackboxswbdmurray: ahh thanks. discrepancy of our typical SRU expection vs this case18:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (impish-proposed) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~21.10.3]18:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~18.04.3]18:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~20.04.3]18:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~18.04.2 => 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~18.04.3] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)18:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~20.04.2 => 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~20.04.3] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)18:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (impish-proposed/main) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~21.10.2 => 22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~21.10.3] (core, ubuntu-cloud)18:24
blackboxswbdmurray: fixed thans18:25
bdmurrayblackboxsw: you already used your one review ;-)18:26
mitya57Hi all! I have Qt 5.15.3 transition almost ready to land: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4803/+packages. It's a bugfix release but I had to rebuild all reverse dependencies of private ABI (as usual with Qt). Any objections if I try to land it tomorrow or on the weekend?18:27
bdmurrayThe autopkgtest queue is a hot mess right now18:28
bdmurrayI'd really prefer we not add more things to the queue until we get things settled down a bit18:29
tjaaltonbdmurray: hi, lukasz is off, so do you think bolt backport for bug 1962349 is ok for focal?18:31
ubottuBug 1962349 in linux-oem-5.17 (Ubuntu Jammy) "Bolt doesn't work with native USB4 hosts" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196234918:31
mitya57bdmurray: ok. How long do you expect it to be in this state?18:32
bdmurraymitya57: IDK we've been having an issue with one of the clouds but I think its stabilized.18:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (impish-proposed) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~21.10.3]20:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~20.04.3]20:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [22.1-14-g2e17a0d6-0ubuntu1~18.04.3]20:33
blackboxswexcellent bdmurray thanks for that. we'll kick off integration test verification runs as soon as this shows up in -proposed20:34
bdmurrayvorlon: Did you get a chance to look at the .img vs .iso issue?21:19
bdmurrayvorlon: I think I found it21:34
blackboxswbdmurray: we've stolen so much of your time today. But verification-done and test logs complete on the `regression-updates` bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1966085  which fixes snap and subiquity-based Desktop installer concerns.22:23
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1966085 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Impish) "cloud-init status --wait never returns if datasource not found" [Undecided, Fix Committed]22:23
blackboxswbrian: I know we don't release on Friday, so I was thinking of pinging RA-OF in this case for final review since you've done all the lifting for the initial review22:23
bdmurrayFor the record I've sorted the .img vs .iso image creation issue but have only rebuilt ubuntu-desktop so far.22:35
brycehubuntu-archive, would someone be able to assist with removal of php-doctrine-bundle? (LP: #1966106)  It is the last thing blocking symfony (composer just migrated)22:38
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1966106 in php-doctrine-bundle (Ubuntu) "Please remove php-doctrine-bundle source and binary from jammy" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196610622:38
bdmurrayRAOF: ^22:42
RAOF(On a call, will look once it's done)22:58
vorlonbdmurray: I had not yet - is it resolved now?23:01
bdmurrayvorlon: Yes.23:03
vorlonI notice that the argument to these functions has changed from a string to a list23:04
RAOFbryceh: Enjoy! Hopefully that does indeed get symfony migrated!23:32
Eickmeyer[m]bdmurray and vorlon: Many thanks to you both. I'm sorry I'm not always the least-demanding individual.23:33
brycehRAOF, excellent, thanks!23:35
vorlondoko: did you want python3.10-nopie seeded in main?23:45

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!