[12:16] <guiverc> ~24 hours ago I noted a reddit post that mentioned a Xubuntu jammy install (without internet) results in NO firefox being installed.  I've not had time to test for it & raise bug report (if it's true).  I did look & saw the manifest only has *deb* package that downloads/installs snap & no snap on ISO (unlike say Lubuntu)..
[12:23] <fossfreedom> guiverc: that's probably because xubuntu seeds need to have the various snaps installed ..  at the moment just the firefox transition package is in the seeds
[12:23] <guiverc> yep my conclusion too.. (what I replied on reddit when I compared lubuntu's & xubuntu's..)
[12:32] <guiverc> thanks fossfreedom :)
 Ubuntu upgrade from 20.04.4 to 22.04 crashes - has anyone upgraded sucessfully?
 https://matterbridge.thomas-ward.net/f062c7bc/giphy.mp4
 The new installer is once again broken
 downloading the image for the older installer from yesterday now to test if that works
 What flavour? (re @bittin1: The new installer is once again broken)
 regular Ubuntu, the older installer image from 26th March worked tough (re @Leokolb: What flavour?)
 but todays Canary image is bork
 (I don't think bridge to IRC is working.. so re-posting)..
 ~24 hours ago I noted a reddit post that mentioned a Xubuntu jammy install (without internet) results in NO firefox being installed.  I've not had time to test for it & raise bug report (if it's true).  I did look & saw the manifest only has *deb* package that downloads/installs snap & no snap on ISO (unlike say Lubuntu)..
 was this ever a bidirectional bridge?
 i believe there was.
 (it probably needs kicked, the bridge)
 (for this channel.. but I'm in a number of rooms & maybe mis-remembering)
 I'm mentioning in case I forget, or don't have time tomorrow too... I planned to test today & file bug once confirmed (I won't trust a reddit post until I've verified it) but it's near 23:30 & I'm going to have to head to bed soon... no time today...
 Might be able to test it later today (re @guiverc: I'm mentioning in case I forget, or don't have time tomorrow too... I planned to test today & file bug once confirmed (I won't trust a reddit post until I've verified it) but it's near 23:30 & I'm going to have to head to bed soon... no time today...)
 thanks @Leokolb :) (re @Leokolb: Might be able to test it later today)
 the reddit comment is correct - i did not file a bug as i think this still in progress https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1962021 (re @guiverc: thanks @Leokolb :))
 Firefox snap @guiverc i manually installed - took 10 minutes and then all ok -
 Took a better look at the Xubuntu issue - submitted https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xubuntu-default-settings/+bug/1966794 -
 If anyone has time - great to get a confirm on this https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1966774
 i'll put some cycles at this by EOD (afgter work or if i'm bored, got stuff today first)
 (via VM)
 got an example partition layout for me to replicate?  I assume you have a separate boot partition (re @Leokolb: If anyone has time - great to get a confirm on this https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1966774)
 Just a simple btrfs partition / plus the efi boot partition (re @teward001: got an example partition layout for me to replicate?  I assume you have a separate boot partition)
 ok because i don't have uefi enabled i have the 8mb bios-grub partition, a /boot fat32, and now running install.  stbdy
 big tks
 confirmed and marked as such
 thanks @teward001 also good to have the BIOS as well as UEFI
 yep.  i need to back up my data sooner or later i'm getting to the point a clean install is needed >.<
 Thanks... I've seen the chatter on fixing this in the last ~hour... so thanks @Leokolb (re @Leokolb: Took a better look at the Xubuntu issue - submitted https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xubuntu-default-settings/+bug/1966794 -)
[22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Jammy Beta] (20220328.1) has been added