[01:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Jammy Beta] (20220329) has been added
[01:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Jammy Beta] (20220329) has been added
[01:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Jammy Beta] (20220329) has been added
[01:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Jammy Beta] (20220329) has been added
[01:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-eslint-visitor-keys (jammy-proposed/universe) [3.3.0+~0.0.51-1 => 3.3.0+~0.0.51-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[03:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Jammy Beta] (20220330) has been added
[03:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Jammy Beta] (20220330) has been added
[03:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Jammy Beta] (20220330) has been added
[03:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Jammy Beta] (20220330) has been added
[04:19] <plars> isotracker seems slow/unresponsive at the moment
[04:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Jammy Beta] has been updated (20220330)
[05:13] <fossfreedom> Ubuntu Budgie is not part of the jammy beta iso party?
[05:13] <bryceh> ubuntu-archive, LP: #1967048 looks like an easy/obvious package removal if anyone gets a chance
[05:13] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1967048 in node-puppeteer (Ubuntu) "Please remove node-puppeteer source and binaries from jammy" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1967048
[05:23] <RAOF> That's some pretty compelling reasoning :)
[05:23] <cpaelzer> indeed
[05:23] <RAOF> cpaelzer: Are you doing that?
[05:23] <cpaelzer> yeah I'm looking at it
[05:24]  * RAOF shall stop, then.
[05:24] <bryceh> thanks cpaelzer :-)
[05:25] <bryceh> (I am hiding from my crazy children)
[05:27] <bryceh> one other thing I ran into that probably needs an AA but I don't know what to ask for:  node-carto has changed dependencies and now requires node-hsluv.  node-hsluv is in Debian but hasn't appeared in Ubuntu.  I think the right solution is to request sync for node-hsluv but am not sure how to file such a request
[05:28] <bryceh> feels like a MIR, but both are universe things so more of a UIR ;-)
[05:31] <cpaelzer> let me finish pupeteer first before reading into this, I'm still slow as I try to triple check everything
[05:36] <cpaelzer> RAOF: if you do not mind you could have a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu-archive-tools/+git/ubuntu-archive-tools/+merge/417088 as I can't self approve myself :-)
[05:42] <cpaelzer> bryceh: the first case is done but it has a small spin off task for you :-/ sorry
[05:43] <cpaelzer> looking into hsluv/carto now ...
[05:45] <bryceh> no worries, thanks
[05:47] <cpaelzer> ok bryceh I think carto/hsluv initially is less of a permission/AA question
[05:48] <cpaelzer> at first I thought yeah, let us probably just sync hsluv probably recommend to file abug to explain as it will hit the new queue
[05:48] <cpaelzer> but
[05:48] <cpaelzer> that isn't the final picture now that I looked around
[05:48] <cpaelzer> bryceh: take a look here https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/node-hsluv/+publishinghistory
[05:48] <bryceh> mm
[05:49] <cpaelzer> it isn't just "not synced yet" but was removed for a problem
[05:49] <cpaelzer> then OTOH ppx-tools is back
[05:49] <cpaelzer>  ppx-tools | 6.4-1build1  | jammy/universe  | source
[05:49] <bryceh> cpaelzer, I also see it may not just be hsluv; there are also depends on dh-sequence-nodejs,  dh-sequence-sphinxdoc that I'm not spotting in the archive
[05:49] <cpaelzer> so before syncing it back we might want to have a PPA showing that the old FTFBS around ppx-tools (or the new version thereof) does not break things in hsluv
[05:50] <cpaelzer> bryceh: pkg-js-tools => Provides: dh-sequence-nodejs (= 0.12.10), dh-sequence-nodejs-no-lerna (= 0.12.10)
[05:51] <cpaelzer> similarly sphinx-common for dh-sequence-sphinxdoc
[05:51] <bryceh> ah ok
[05:51] <cpaelzer> my suggestion would be 1. take a ppa and ensure hsluv and then carto with it is building fine in jammy
[05:51] <cpaelzer> 2. check that it install (dependencies) fine in jammy
[05:52] <cpaelzer> 3. do a sanity check
[05:52] <cpaelzer> 4. with the info you collected in 1-3 make a bug on carto+hsluv asking for an FFe to resolve the current issue being stuck in -proposed
[05:52] <RAOF> <cpaelzer> "RAOF (he/his): if you do not..." <- That looks sensible; approved.
[05:53] <cpaelzer> once that FFe is approved you can sync it and guide the builds/migration
[05:53] <cpaelzer> thanks RAOF
[05:55] <cpaelzer> bryceh: does this path forward seem reasonable to you?
[06:02] <bryceh> cpaelzer, it answers the question, yes.  :-)  (With all the node packages I'm looking for either low-hanging fruit, or keystone things that'll unblock lots)
[06:02] <cpaelzer> ok
[06:03] <cpaelzer> good luck in hiding from the crazy kids :-)
[06:03] <bryceh> yeah speaking of which I probably should assist in knocking them out, er putting them to bed.  cya
[06:49] <icey> jamespage: ah, should have removed pon's patch in the ceph point release; it's included in the upstream release :-/
[06:49] <icey> s/removed pon's patch/removed the changelog lines relating to it/
[06:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdbd-mysql-perl (jammy-proposed/universe) [4.050-4ubuntu1 => 4.050-5] (mythbuntu) (sync)
[07:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-tweak (jammy-proposed/universe) [22.04.7-0ubuntu1 => 22.04.8-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)
[07:16] <Wimpy> Please allow and unblock mate-tweak 22.04.8-0ubuntu1
[07:20] <fossfreedom> Any release managers around? I can see UB jammy daily was built last night, but I isn't on the tracker/beta release folder.
[07:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ldns (impish-proposed/universe) [1.7.1-2build1 => 1.7.1-2ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vitis-ai (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.3.2-0ubuntu9 => 2.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vitis-ai [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Jammy Beta] (20220329.1) has been added
[08:39] <juliank> sil2100: I was silly, 4810 was a valid ppc64el rebuild PPA too
[08:39] <juliank> sil2100: So it was really 4810, 4813, 4815, 4816
[08:40] <sil2100> juliank: should I re-add 4810 as well? Or did that already migrate?
[08:40] <juliank> sil2100: re-add I suppose; like aspell and attr can migrate I suppose
[08:41] <sil2100> On it!
[08:48] <juliank> sil2100: We also still have 7 packages left with old ppc64el baseline that failed to build: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4812, I guess maybe someone can pick that up for +1
[08:49] <juliank> but also I think a few are desktop
[08:50] <juliank> oh some were fixed with the same version, so don't show up as newer verson
[08:52] <juliank> ltrace is foundations, the rest is desktop packages
[08:53] <juliank> seb128: so there are 5 desktop ftbfs remaining from the ppc64el baselinr rebuild in the PPA above, I don't know which were on the archive rebuild report and carded on your side
[08:54] <juliank> I guess libblockdev and zsys were
[08:54] <seb128> yes and exempi is carded
[08:54] <seb128> lbdb wasn't
[08:54] <juliank> and tmispell-voikko is desktop too
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (focal-proposed/main) [1:0.9.0~0.20.04.6 => 1:0.9.0~0.20.04.7] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (impish-proposed/main) [1:0.9.2.4~0.21.10.1 => 1:0.9.2.4~0.21.10.2] (desktop-core)
[08:55] <seb128> juliank, that one is green in the ppa?
[08:55] <juliank> oh
[08:55] <juliank> indeed
[08:55] <juliank> it must have flaky build
[08:56] <juliank> copied
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tmispell-voikko (jammy-proposed/main) [0.7.1-5 => 0.7.1-5build1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[08:57] <juliank> seb128: zsys even is actually good, it didn't build on s390x and armhf in release pocket either
[08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zsys (jammy-proposed/main) [0.5.8build1 => 0.5.8build2] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[08:59] <juliank> yay, down to 4 missing rebuilds :)
[08:59] <juliank> ** autopkgtest arm64 workers increased by 33% **
[09:00] <RikMills> sil2100: hey, I have plasma 5.24.4 to land once the beta is done. I take it will be ok to land the whole stack, even though some of the tars will not have much of a change apart from a version bump?
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lbdb (jammy-proposed/main) [0.49.1 => 0.49.2] (core)
[09:01] <seb128> juliank, ^ down to 3
[09:02] <juliank> cool
[09:05] <seb128> sil2100, we asked yesterday to have gnome-shell unblocked before beta, was that nacked?
[09:06] <seb128> https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/03/29/%23ubuntu-release.html#t09:17
[09:07] <seb128> sil2100, also could you accept mesa from the unapproved queue? the recent 22 update had a regression that makes GL applications segfault under xorg, the update fixes it by reverting a change
[09:07] <tjaalton> I've just uploaded 22.0.1
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (jammy-proposed/main) [22.0.0-0ubuntu2 => 22.0.1-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg)
[09:08] <tjaalton> it also fixes a typo/thinko in the amber recommends
[09:08] <tjaalton> which reminds me, can a package in manifest recommend a package from universe?
[09:10] <seb128> tjaalton, no
[09:10] <tjaalton> rats
[09:10] <seb128> that's a component mismatch
[09:10] <tjaalton> then don't accept this :)
[09:11] <seb128> either lower to a suggests or MIR
[09:14] <seb128> juliank, do you have any idea about the libblockdev one? it's always puzzling to me when a no change rebuild makes a stack of new symbols be listed
[09:14] <seb128> is that a toolchain regression?
[09:15] <tjaalton> I've opened bug 1967086 for the MIR, should be a simple one since this is essentially mesa 21.3.x
[09:15] <ubottu> Bug 1967086 in mesa-amber (Ubuntu) "MIR: mesa-amber" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1967086
[09:17] <seb128> tjaalton, you might want to address the code duplication there and provide a bit more details on which binaries are going to be provided and who is going to consume those
[09:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: intel-media-driver-non-free (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [22.2.1+ds1-1 => 22.2.1+ds1-1build1] (i386-whitelist)
[09:18] <seb128> sil2100, can you also unblock intel-media-driver? it's in universe and the current binary is just broken
[09:24] <juliank> seb128: seems all internal symbols became public? odd
[09:26] <tjaalton> seb128: done, I think
[09:26] <juliank> seb128: the symbols are not even from the library, it seems to be linking in some other library statically?
[09:27] <juliank> extern int erase_metadata(struct lib_context *lc); is in dmraid source package
[09:28] <juliank> seb128: I think libdmraid is broken
[09:28] <juliank> seb128: The static library is in /usr/lib/<multi-arch>, the dynamic one in /usr/lib, and linker hence links to the static one (cc doko, ginggs)
[09:29] <juliank> seb128, doko, ginggs so this worked before because the dynamic one was in /lib, but with usrmerge, the static one in multi-arch is preferred
[09:30] <juliank> basically mv /usr/lib/libdmraid.so  /usr/lib/<multi-arch>/
[09:30] <juliank> is what's needed to fix this
[09:30] <juliank> and I guess rebuild everything built against libdmraid that accidentally got linked statically
[09:32] <juliank> seb128: I think just a merge of dmraid needed which fixes https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005622
[09:32] <ubottu> Debian bug 1005622 in libdmraid-dev "libblockdev: FTBFS: dpkg-gensymbols: error: some new symbols appeared in the symbols file: see diff output below" [Serious, Open]
[09:33] <seb128> juliank, thanks, I will check that
[09:38] <mwhudson> oh no usrmerge _did_ actually cause a problem
[09:39] <tjaalton> sil2100: so the queue has two mesa uploads, the older one is safe to accept, the newer one fixes a Recommends so that it'd pull libgl1-amber-dri but it's still in universe. maybe deal with the MIR after beta
[09:39] <juliank> mwhudson: actually I think it's full library moving to multi-arch dir, but symlink was not updated
[09:39] <mwhudson> juliank: argh
[09:40] <juliank> in 1.0.0.rc16-10 /usr/lib/libdmraid.so is a dangling symlink to
[09:40] <juliank> > /lib/libdmraid.so.1.0.0.rc16
[09:40] <juliank> to quote mbiebl
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pygame (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.9.6+dfsg-5ubuntu2 => 2.1.2+dfsg-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:01] <seb128> juliank, ^ fix from Debian cherrypicked, thanks for the help figuring it out, I will handle rebuilds from rdepends once that one is accepted, build, published
[10:02] <seb128> sorry hit enter before the bot picked it up :p
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dmraid (jammy-proposed/main) [1.0.0.rc16-10ubuntu1 => 1.0.0.rc16-10ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[10:03] <seb128> sil2100, there isn't any bug reference for the delta added back with https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/1.0.0.rc16-10ubuntu1 ... is that only until the LTS or what's the deal there?
[10:05] <Wimpy> sil2100 Please allow and unblock mate-tweak 22.04.8-0ubuntu1
[10:06] <juliank> seb128: could have been merged, there wasn't anything else in the Debian upload than what you cherry-picked, but oh well, doesn't matter much; might be nicer this way if we can sync it next cycle
[10:06] <seb128> indeed
[10:16] <sil2100> seb128: the bug the delta was fixing was old and closed, maybe I could have added it to the changelog. As per the changelog entry, I wasn't sure if the delta is still needed or not (felt like it might be?) - I asked people around for it on IRC but no one remembered anything
[10:16] <sil2100> So instead of syncing and then suddenly learning through some weird issues that it was indeed still needed, I decided to keep it as a merge
[10:17] <sil2100> Wimpy: hey hey! Looking!
[10:28] <sil2100> Wimpy: accepting! But not sure if this will make it for Beta
[10:28] <sil2100> Since if all goes well, we won't be re-spinning
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-tweak [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.04.8-0ubuntu1]
[10:30] <sil2100> tjaalton: okay, I can accept the older mesa upload, but since Beta is already in-flight, I think we'll only get that into the release pocket in case of a respin, if anything. How frequently is this crash visible?
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.0.0-0ubuntu3]
[10:51] <RikMills> sil2100: did you catch my message about plasma 5.24.4?
[10:52] <sil2100> RikMills: ah, sorry! Got lost in though about that. How many packages are we talking here this time?
[10:52] <RikMills> sil2100: 51
[10:52] <RikMills> https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/4823
[10:53] <RikMills> sil2100: I have done this after beta every release I can recall
[10:54] <sil2100> RikMills: we have a lot of movement in -proposed still, a bit too much than I would like, but I'd say 'yes'
[10:54] <tjaalton> sil2100: shouldn't be too visible I think, it happens on xorg lauching some apps like 'gnome-chess' or 'gnome-extensions-app' that I know of
[10:54] <sil2100> tjaalton: ok, that's good to hear
[10:56] <RikMills> sil2100: thanks. it can wait a little to land if that makes things easier. I can ask at that point
[12:29]  * ginggs looks at the growing jammy unapproved queue https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: budgie-artwork (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.14.3 => 0.14.4] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie)
[12:29] <ginggs> isn't there usually a bot that auto-accepts unseeded packages during freeze?
[12:40] <cjwatson> It seems to be writing "Series no longer in active development; not accepting packages" to its log file
[12:41] <cjwatson> Which seems to have been a change from vorlon on 2021-10-14.  I don't know whether that was supposed to also include the pre-release freeze state?
[12:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (focal-proposed/main) [15.2.14-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 15.2.16-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[12:47] <sil2100> Oh
[13:27] <Wimpy> Thanks for mate-tweak sil2100
[13:32] <sil2100> cjwatson, ginggs: ok, hopefully this should be better now
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-github-hhatto-gorst [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.0~git20181029.ca9f730-2ubuntu1]
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-eslint-visitor-keys [sync] (jammy-proposed) [3.3.0+~0.0.51-2]
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted softhsm2 [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.6.1-2ubuntu1]
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted intel-media-driver-non-free [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.2.1+ds1-1build1]
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pygame [sync] (jammy-proposed) [2.1.2+dfsg-3]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted 0ad [sync] (jammy-proposed) [0.0.25b-2]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted elementpath [sync] (jammy-proposed) [2.5.0-1]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted notmuch [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.35-2ubuntu1]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-openssl [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.4.6+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cctbx [sync] (jammy-proposed) [2021.12+ds1-4]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-xmlschema [sync] (jammy-proposed) [1.10.0-1]
[13:34] <sil2100> \o/
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gemmi [sync] (jammy-proposed) [0.5.3+ds-2]
[13:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-calls (jammy-proposed/universe) [42~rc.1-1 => 42.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-calls [sync] (jammy-proposed) [42.0-1]
[14:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: webkit2gtk (jammy-proposed/main) [2.36.0-1 => 2.36.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-online-accounts (jammy-proposed/main) [3.43.1-1ubuntu1 => 3.44.0-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: meta-phosh (jammy-proposed/universe) [6 => 7] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted meta-phosh [sync] (jammy-proposed) [7]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: goffice (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.10.50-1 => 0.10.51-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)
[17:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mysql-8.0 (focal-proposed/main) [8.0.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.3 => 8.0.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.4] (i386-whitelist)
[17:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mysql-8.0 (impish-proposed/main) [8.0.28-0ubuntu0.21.10.3 => 8.0.28-0ubuntu0.21.10.4] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:56] <kanashiro> hi release team, I'd like to ask someone to take a quick look at this MP changing pacemaker to avoid pulling bin:resource-agents (and bin:resource-agents-extra) into main: https://code.launchpad.net/~lucaskanashiro/ubuntu/+source/pacemaker/+git/pacemaker/+merge/417962
[17:56] <kanashiro> ahasenack and I were not sure if a release team approval is needed
[18:10] <bdmurray> A change to have less stuff in main? Let me have a look.
[18:12] <bdmurray> kanashiro: this is not something that requires release team approval, but thanks for detailing out the plan and checking
[18:13] <kanashiro> bdmurray, thanks for confirming that, appreciated :)
[18:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pacemaker (jammy-proposed/main) [2.1.2-1ubuntu2 => 2.1.2-1ubuntu3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[18:31] <bdmurray> paride: How is the server testing going?
[18:33] <ahasenack> bdmurray: thanks
[18:44] <plars> isotracker down again :(
[18:44] <bdmurray> plars: Yeah, its being worked on
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted squeekboard [sync] (jammy-proposed) [1.17.0-1]
[19:01] <Eickmeyer> cjwatson: Looks like lcy02 had an issue with a build, similar to what was happening with jammy: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/593957727/buildlog_ubuntu_focal_amd64_ubuntustudio_BUILDING.txt.gz
[19:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (focal-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.22 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.23] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:25] <bdmurray> sil2100: Why does current have 2022-03-26 for the jammy-desktop-amd64.iso? https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/daily-live/current/
[19:26] <bdmurray> There's a new image in 20220329.1
[19:32] <sil2100> bdmurray: I guess there's some automated testing running for every desktop image before it gets 'promoted' to current, so I'd suppose those are failing
[19:33] <sil2100> But sadly I don't know the details of this testing, desktop team people would know
[19:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aodh (jammy-proposed/main) [1:14.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu2 => 1:14.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: barbican (jammy-proposed/main) [2:13.0.0+git2022030310.ffea7f79-0ubuntu1 => 2:14.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: resource-agents (jammy-proposed/main) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu6 => 1:4.7.0-1ubuntu7] (ubuntu-server)
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: designate (jammy-proposed/main) [1:13.0.0+git2022030310.8ce022a7-0ubuntu1 => 1:14.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (jammy-proposed/main) [2:19.1.0+git2022030313.b072cbf05f-0ubuntu1 => 2:20.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (jammy-proposed/main) [3:24.0.0+git2022030310.3f274c65cc-0ubuntu2 => 3:25.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glance (jammy-proposed/main) [2:24.0.0~rc1+git2022030311.d4119be05-0ubuntu1 => 2:24.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: heat (jammy-proposed/main) [1:17.0.1+git2022030311.968969b99-0ubuntu1 => 1:18.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[20:59] <ahasenack> hi release team, am I right that we should refrain from merging this MP (https://code.launchpad.net/~alexmurray/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu-seeds/+merge/417621) now, and wait for next week?
[21:00] <ahasenack> it makes iptables optional, and adds nftables to main (also optional, aka, recommends)
[21:02] <bdmurray> Yes, we aren't likely to have a rebuild but if I we do that would be taken into account
[21:02] <cjwatson> Eickmeyer: it's just the same thing - focal vs. jammy makes no difference.  The ticket is still with the cloud operations team
[21:02] <ahasenack> bdmurray: ok
[21:03] <ahasenack> bdmurray: so right after the beta is officially released on Thursday?
[21:03] <Eickmeyer> cjwatson: Kinda what I thought.
[21:04] <bdmurray> ahasenack: Yeah
[21:04] <ahasenack> thx
[21:06] <ahasenack> sbeattie: ^ sometime tomorrow or Friday then
[21:19] <sbeattie> ahasenack, bdmurray: thanks!
[21:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libinline-python-perl (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.56-2ubuntu1 => 0.56-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[21:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libinline-python-perl [sync] (jammy-proposed) [0.56-3]
[22:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: blueprint-compiler (jammy-proposed/primary) [0~20220302-2]
[23:16] <sil2100> o/
[23:18] <sil2100> Okay, I see we have a few bugs here and there mentioned on the tracker, but I think those are all things we can target to fix after Beta
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity riscv64 [Jammy Beta] (20220330.1) has been added
[23:20] <sil2100> Let me start pre-publishing the images anyway
[23:23] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: Yeah, looks good from an Ubuntu Studio perspective. The only issue I just caught was that MyPaint is broken, likely due to Python 3.10. Upstream has been made aware.
[23:24] <Eickmeyer> I have noticed some tangental theming bugs, but that's fixes I can throw-in after beta.
[23:24] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: thanks!
[23:24] <sil2100> We will all have quite a lot to do before release, but I think it's still not as bad as it could be
[23:25] <Eickmeyer> Indeed!
[23:31] <sil2100> Okay, images pre-published - let's check up again on things tomorrow, but I thing we'll just go with it around the afternoon
[23:31] <sil2100> Keep on testing, if possible o/
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mypaint (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-2 => 2.0.1-2build1] (ubuntustudio)
[23:59]  * Eickmeyer blinks