[01:21] <guiverc> sfxpt, http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/429/builds is the ISO QA Tracker which will allow you to record your results for any QA-testing of beta RC testing you do (for Lubuntu or others..)  It also has links to download ISOs for each
[01:33] <sfxpt> genii 👌👍🙏🙏
[01:33] <sfxpt> guiverc 👌👍🙏🙏
[01:34] <guiverc> sfxpt, thank you for helping QA-test our Lubuntu jammy product :)
[01:35] <sfxpt> 😃💪💪
[19:36] <suntong> Hi, so I DL the ISO QA Tracker from http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/429/builds, but found I cannot boot from the .iso with my usual method any more. Is this a known issue?
[19:36] <suntong> Basically they way I boot all my live .iso are documented at https://dev.to/suntong/maintenance-free-system-multi-booting-1dpk#iso
[19:38] <suntong>     loopback loop "$iso_path"
[19:38] <suntong>     menuentry 'Live (amd64)' {
[19:38] <suntong>       bootoptions="boot=casper iso-scan/filename=$iso_path noeject noprompt"
[19:38] <suntong>       linux (loop)/casper/vmlinuz $bootoptions
[19:38] <suntong>       initrd (loop)/casper/initrd
[19:38] <suntong>     }
[19:40] <suntong> is the main part *that I* has always been using
[20:50] <suntong> "Cannot send to nick/channel"
[20:50] <suntong> is it for somebody else, or for my several messages above?
 dont multiline paste or you get rate limited
[20:53] <teward> you were temporarily muted for spamming lines.  use a pastebin instead for multiline pasting.
[20:53] <teward> !pastebin | suntong
[20:54] <suntong> gotcha, will do...
[20:55] <teward> so you said it isnt working "like it normally does" - the beta release is just that, a beta, but what is "normal" and what are you seeing are the real questions.
[20:57] <suntong> I understand what beta means, but booting from the .iso has been a standard practice for years.
 i'll have to do a test later to see if i can repro your approach here but i dont think Ubuntu ISOs are guaranteed especially at this point in the xycle to boot in this way.  what errors DO you see or get when you try?
[20:58] <suntong> it is very unlikely to fail, both from .iso generation part, or from .iso booting part, unless something has dramatically changed.
 because its not clear here what actually happens and what errors you get vs. your normal approach
[21:01] <suntong> my normal approach is documented at https://dev.to/suntong/maintenance-free-system-multi-booting-1dpk#iso
[21:01] <suntong>  and I post the main part in https://paste.debian.net/1236315/
[21:02] <suntong> when boot from .iso, it keeps saying cannot read from `/dev/sr0`, which should have been pointing to .iso content instead.
[21:04] <suntong> Thanks for trying out booting from the .iso, or to repro my approach.
[21:05] <teward> will take a while 'cause i'm busy.  i know direct ISO boot (a-la the Direct Boot from the USB stick or DVD) works, even in VMs, so you'll have to wait a while since i have work
[21:08] <suntong> OK. NP.
[21:08] <suntong> Just booting from an .iso file would be a better approach for most people I'd assume, as they don't need a spare USB stick, or consume a DVD just for one-time testing.
[21:11] <suntong> is there a telegram group that I can join instead?
 I think the link is in the topic.