[01:21] sfxpt, http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/429/builds is the ISO QA Tracker which will allow you to record your results for any QA-testing of beta RC testing you do (for Lubuntu or others..) It also has links to download ISOs for each [01:33] genii 👌👍🙏🙏 [01:33] guiverc 👌👍🙏🙏 [01:34] sfxpt, thank you for helping QA-test our Lubuntu jammy product :) [01:35] 😃💪💪 [19:36] Hi, so I DL the ISO QA Tracker from http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/429/builds, but found I cannot boot from the .iso with my usual method any more. Is this a known issue? [19:36] Basically they way I boot all my live .iso are documented at https://dev.to/suntong/maintenance-free-system-multi-booting-1dpk#iso [19:38] loopback loop "$iso_path" [19:38] menuentry 'Live (amd64)' { [19:38] bootoptions="boot=casper iso-scan/filename=$iso_path noeject noprompt" [19:38] linux (loop)/casper/vmlinuz $bootoptions [19:38] initrd (loop)/casper/initrd [19:38] } [19:40] is the main part *that I* has always been using [20:50] "Cannot send to nick/channel" [20:50] is it for somebody else, or for my several messages above? [20:52] [telegram] dont multiline paste or you get rate limited [20:53] you were temporarily muted for spamming lines. use a pastebin instead for multiline pasting. [20:53] !pastebin | suntong [20:53] suntong: For posting multi-line texts into the channel, please use https://paste.ubuntu.com | To post !screenshots use https://imgur.com/ !pastebinit to paste directly from command line | Make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the channel topic. [20:54] gotcha, will do... [20:55] so you said it isnt working "like it normally does" - the beta release is just that, a beta, but what is "normal" and what are you seeing are the real questions. [20:57] I understand what beta means, but booting from the .iso has been a standard practice for years. [20:58] [telegram] i'll have to do a test later to see if i can repro your approach here but i dont think Ubuntu ISOs are guaranteed especially at this point in the xycle to boot in this way. what errors DO you see or get when you try? [20:58] it is very unlikely to fail, both from .iso generation part, or from .iso booting part, unless something has dramatically changed. [20:58] [telegram] because its not clear here what actually happens and what errors you get vs. your normal approach [21:01] my normal approach is documented at https://dev.to/suntong/maintenance-free-system-multi-booting-1dpk#iso [21:01] and I post the main part in https://paste.debian.net/1236315/ [21:02] when boot from .iso, it keeps saying cannot read from `/dev/sr0`, which should have been pointing to .iso content instead. [21:04] Thanks for trying out booting from the .iso, or to repro my approach. [21:05] will take a while 'cause i'm busy. i know direct ISO boot (a-la the Direct Boot from the USB stick or DVD) works, even in VMs, so you'll have to wait a while since i have work [21:08] OK. NP. [21:08] Just booting from an .iso file would be a better approach for most people I'd assume, as they don't need a spare USB stick, or consume a DVD just for one-time testing. [21:11] is there a telegram group that I can join instead? [21:53] [telegram] I think the link is in the topic.