[02:39] <Unit193> rbasak: Got your ping about 50 minutes after you made it. :3
[13:11] <cpaelzer> juliank: hi, we've seen a bunch of noise in regard to the "No change rebuild for ppc64el baseline bump" show up in the excuses by team
[13:11] <cpaelzer> I have looked into a few but they all seem flaky issues, I didn't see a real one yet
[13:12] <cpaelzer> juliank: I wanted to ask if we can ignore them (as checking each could be a massive time sink) since you are chasing them down anyway?
[13:13] <cpaelzer> juliank: The assumption would be that you drive this mass rebuild and if in doubt would let us know, thereby we could ignore all the "No change rebuild for ppc64el baseline bump." for now - does this work for you?
[13:25] <juliank> cpaelzer: this should be driven by +1 maintenance really
[13:31] <juliank> cpaelzer: like the uploads were part of +1, people working on +1 should continue it
[13:32] <juliank> cpaelzer: we removed the transitional nature where everything was grouped by PPA so it's much easier now to tackle individual packages
[13:33] <juliank> cpaelzer: that being said, any action should likely wait for the queues to be empty
[13:33] <juliank> If it involves arm retries
[13:33] <juliank> But don't know
[13:33] <juliank> The more important the package the earlier you should probably retry tests
[13:34] <juliank> I don't have the capacity to overlook tests triggered by 450 uploads on my own
[14:20] <cpaelzer> thanks for the FYI juliank
[14:21] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, hey, what is jxrlib needed for?
[14:21] <cpaelzer> juliank: "the uploads were part of +1" sounds odd though, is there background/bugs that I missed to read to better understand this?
[14:24] <juliank> cpaelzer: I had my +1 shift last week on Thu/Fri and that was communicated as being a thing I should be taking over
[14:24] <juliank> cpaelzer: so that's what I did
[14:24] <juliank> I need to send a report, it exists somewhere
[14:26] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, wine-development
[14:27] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, thx
[14:28] <LocutusOfBorg> merci a toi :)
[14:29] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, btw https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jxrlib/+bug/1946730
[14:29] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1946730 in jxrlib (Ubuntu) "libjxr0:i386 is missing since Ubuntu 20.04" [Undecided, New]
[14:36] <LocutusOfBorg> now the dependency is more "strict"
[14:37] <LocutusOfBorg> (fortunately)
[14:42] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, should I no change rebuild? I see the commit
[14:44] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, I tried to do a --force-same-destination copy-package which usually works but it isn't there for some reason
[14:44] <LocutusOfBorg> because that version never went in i386?
[14:44] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, ah, it seems the copy ended in unapproved from the release channel
[14:44] <LocutusOfBorg> oh... LOL true
[14:45] <LocutusOfBorg> ended there... twice :D
[16:07] <ddstreet> bdmurray jchittum i added a MR to lp: #1965180 in case you want to get that fixed before jammy
[16:07] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1965180 in software-properties (Ubuntu Jammy) "apt-add-repository requires --login for private repos, breaking automated workflows" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1965180
[16:11] <bdmurray> ddstreet: great, thanks for doing that
=== chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson