| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 02:23 | |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Eickmeyer> @Leokolb For future reference, inability to install using btrfs would not be a "critical" bug. Those are reserved for release-blocking bugs. Calamares can still install on other, better-supported file formats, so btrfs isn't a blocker. | 02:35 |
|---|---|---|
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <tsimonq2> I would disagree, I don't necessarily think that we don't support it but I do think it doesn't need to be marked as critical | 02:36 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <tsimonq2> It's still something I would think we should fix before the release | 02:37 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Eickmeyer> Still not a release blocker. | 02:38 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <tsimonq2> You have every right to make the choice for your flavor but for us I think we're gonna stick with it as a release blocker | 02:39 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Eickmeyer> Additionally, manual partitioning deviates from the prescribed testcase in which the issue was reported. | 02:39 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Eickmeyer> @tsimonq2 I'm talking about test results on Ubuntu Studio's test cases. | 02:40 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <tsimonq2> Sounds good. In that case, your call (re @Eickmeyer: @tsimonq2 I'm talking about test results on Ubuntu Studio's test cases.) | 02:45 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 02:45 | |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Leokolb> I only reprorted a bug i discovered while testing - i made no reference to it being a release stopper - ?? (re @Eickmeyer: @Leokolb For future reference, inability to install using btrfs would not be a "critical" bug. Those are reserved for release-blocking bugs. Calamares can still install on other, better-supported file formats, so btrfs isn't a blocker.) | 03:54 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Eickmeyer> You listed it as critical. (re @Leokolb: I only reprorted a bug i discovered while testing - i made no reference to it being a release stopper - ??) | 03:54 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Leokolb> It failed the test ..not being able to reboot is a failure - is it not? (re @Eickmeyer: You listed it as critical.) | 03:55 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Eickmeyer> Not if you deviate from the test case. The test case did not call for manual partitioning. (re @Leokolb: It failed the test ..not being able to reboot is a failure - is it not?) | 03:56 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Eickmeyer> Moreover, with Ubuntu Studio, we don't care about btrfs. | 03:57 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Leokolb> Ok I am very sorry - the but for Lubuntu it is still a failure - I will be more careful in the future | 03:57 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Eickmeyer> For Lubuntu, that's fine. Just make sure that you're keeping the testcases divided. :) | 03:57 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Leokolb> you could have sent me a PM about this...unhappy for the critism - i work hard at what I do (re @Eickmeyer: For Lubuntu, that's fine. Just make sure that you're keeping the testcases divided. :)) | 03:59 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Eickmeyer> I understand, and for that I apologize. When it comes to Ubuntu Studio stuff, just ping me before marking stuff critical if there's any question. (re @Leokolb: you could have sent me a PM about this...unhappy for the critism - i work hard at what I do) | 04:00 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Leokolb> The test case does not mention what partition type should be selected - would be nice to specify ext4 / xfs etc (re @Eickmeyer: I understand, and for that I apologize. When it comes to Ubuntu Studio stuff, just ping me before marking stuff critical if there's any question.) | 04:06 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Eickmeyer> The test case says simply to click "Erase Disk and Install" nothing about doing any manual partitioning. (re @Leokolb: The test case does not mention what partition type should be selected - would be nice to specify ext4 / xfs etc) | 04:06 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Leokolb> ok - my mistake - was only trying to help - not many others are testing UbuntuStudio on the qa site - | 04:07 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <tsimonq2> You're welcome to continue as-is with Lubuntu as well (re @Leokolb: ok - my mistake - was only trying to help - not many others are testing UbuntuStudio on the qa site -) | 04:10 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <tsimonq2> There's a reason (iirc) we have extended testcases :) | 04:10 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Leokolb> tks @tsimonq2 I just keep prodding on.. (re @tsimonq2: You're welcome to continue as-is with Lubuntu as well) | 04:13 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Eickmeyer> @Leokolb FYI, If I seem overly short or what-not, I'm terribly sorry. I just apologized to the entire Lubuntu Development channel. | 04:17 |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <Leokolb> No problem. (re @Eickmeyer: @Leokolb FYI, If I seem overly short or what-not, I'm terribly sorry. I just apologized to the entire Lubuntu Development channel.) | 04:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 07:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop (Canary) amd64 [Jammy Beta] (20220329.1) has been added | 08:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 08:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 09:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop (Canary) amd64 [Jammy Beta] has been updated (20220331) | 10:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 12:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 14:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 14:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 14:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 14:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 14:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 14:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 14:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 14:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 14:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity riscv64 [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 14:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 14:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 14:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 14:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 14:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 14:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 14:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Jammy Beta] has been marked as ready | 14:40 | |
| ubuntubridgebot | [telegram] <urbancompasspony> 2257 | 20:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!