 To be honest I took that screenshot before the switch to the snap package
 for firefox in the quick launch
 https://www.airfunding.net/project/660849?hl=en&utm_source=copy&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=collaborate_shares&utm_content=project_id660849&fbclid=IwAR2XnqzlBI3VfSBGgLWdqq_q3hCqOexmZzgw0T728XvC_Kev_5tbcKn7zxc
[11:12] <kc2bez> Don't click the spam on IRC ^ I cleaned it up on Telegram. 
[11:18] <guiverc> I have a hard time thinking anyone would click a link like that anyway
[11:25] <kc2bez> It seems unlikely but I wanted to throw out the words of caution. 
[11:25] <guiverc> For sure & thanks; yep - better to be safe than sorry.
[16:58] <Eickmeyer[m]> Ok, so according to @Leokolb the NCR of Calamares didn't fix the btrfs issue. Does anybody have any other ideas?
[17:00] <Eickmeyer[m]> I'm seeing a similar issue upstream that's open: https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1857
[17:01] <Eickmeyer[m]> and https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1679
 I also ran further tests today on other machines with same failure results - (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <Eickmeyer[m]> Ok, so according to @Leokolb the NCR of Calamares didn't fix the btrfs issue. Does anybody have any other ideas?)
[18:30] <Eickmeyer[m]> Based on my findings, I think this is an upstream issue that remains unresolved.
[18:34] <kc2bez[m]> We could try to jump to the latest version of cala but it is a big jump and I obviously have concerns about that given where we are in the cycle.
 Could we test it before making the jump? (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <kc2bez[m]> We could try to jump to the latest version of cala but it is a big jump and I obviously have concerns about that given where we are in the cycle.)
[18:35] <kc2bez[m]> Maybe we should focus on a possible workaround? If the system is partitioned outside of the installer for example.
 Sounds worth a try (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <kc2bez[m]> Maybe we should focus on a possible workaround? If the system is partitioned outside of the installer for example.)