[01:54] <guiverc> `ubuntu-bug lxqt-config` & firefox won't load :(  - current daily
[01:59] <kc2bez[m]> Yay snaps
[01:59] <kc2bez[m]> Confinement is great and evil at the same time.
 is there a bug agianst apport for this?
[02:17] <guiverc> I was in another room on the machine I was using; I've filed a bug now against both issues, but I've not yet looked for dups..   the lxqt-thingy isn't new & not a concern to me...
[02:19] <guiverc> writing a response to bug from user who wants lubuntu to use wayland...
[02:22] <Eickmeyer[m]> I mean, there is lwqt...
[02:22] <guiverc> yeah I'm saying that; and LXQt issue 10 link
[02:26] <guiverc> 1967642 closed as opinion
[02:26]  * guiverc maybe invalid was more appropriate... but ..
[02:29] <Eickmeyer[m]> Nah, Opinion is the right call.
[02:29] <guiverc> thanks Eickmeyer[m] :)
[02:30] <Eickmeyer[m]> I looked through that guy's bug history, and he has a habit of being a little combative and opinionated. Might be worth keeping an eye on.
[02:35] <guiverc> maybe...
[02:37] <guiverc> my lxqt-config issue being switched to openbox & dup'd to 1845756
[06:02] <guiverc> @Leokolb, I had a user report on discord no issue with ubuntu desktop  (ubuntu-bug not loading firefox)
 i can check this better and file a bug if need be (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <guiverc> @Leokolb, I had a user report on discord no issue with ubuntu desktop  (ubuntu-bug not loading firefox))
[06:03] <guiverc> i just started a zsync of xubuntu, I'll look there when it completes
 ok - in good hands :)
[06:06] <guiverc> fyi:  https://launchpad.net/bugs/1967648 is my report  (currently filed against apport; it'll grab attention maybe, but likely the wrong package it seems)
 Thanks @guiverc - marked confirmed
[06:09] <guiverc> :)
[06:51] <guiverc> no issue with 1967648 on xubuntu.. likely lubuntu only
 Just for the record -Not a workaround but tested an Impish btrfs system upgrade to Jammy Lubuntu with no errors (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <kc2bez[m]> Maybe we should focus on a possible workaround? If the system is partitioned outside of the installer for example.)
 interesting @Leokolb, that fits I think with Eickmeyer's findings that's its a upstream calamares/installer issue maybe... It's something we maybe able to use in release notes, or on forum/discourse when we write about BTRFS, so thanks !
 Right - I wanted to confirm that it is a calamares issue.. (re @guiverc: interesting @Leokolb, that fits I think with Eickmeyer's findings that's its a upstream calamares/installer issue maybe... It's something we maybe able to use in release notes, or on forum/discourse when we write about BTRFS, so thanks !)