| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: civicrm (jammy-proposed/universe) [5.33.2+dfsg1-1build1 => 5.33.2+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 01:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted civicrm [source] (jammy-proposed) [5.33.2+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] | 01:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgweather4 (jammy-proposed/universe) [4.0.0-1 => 4.0.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 02:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgweather4 [sync] (jammy-proposed) [4.0.0-2] | 02:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: osmo-pcu (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-3build3 => 0.8.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 04:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted osmo-pcu [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1] | 04:03 | |
| === tomreyn_ is now known as tomreyn | ||
| LocutusOfBorg | hello, please | 07:08 |
|---|---|---|
| LocutusOfBorg | old binaries left on riscv64: liblldb-dev, libllvm-ocaml-dev, libomp-dev, libomp5, lld, lldb, python3-lldb (from 0.55~exp1) | 07:08 |
| seb128 | hum, what are those recent empty emails on the changes list? where packages copied over themselves for some reason? but that shouldn't trigger an email? | 07:12 |
| mwhudson | seb128: it's to do with "do they build on i386 or not" in some direction or other i think | 07:18 |
| seb128 | mwhudson, weird, I enabled the i386 of some of those and did the copy to got them built, I wonder what was wrong or missing | 07:20 |
| seb128 | I guess that's a question for vorlon | 07:20 |
| seb128 | mwhudson, thanks | 07:20 |
| mwhudson | seb128: yeah i don't know how this works in practice | 07:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, hello, do you know why debhelper is not installable on i386 in 20.04? | 07:34 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, release or backport? | 07:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | backport | 07:34 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965800 | 07:34 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1965800 in debugedit (Ubuntu) "debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency)" [Undecided, New] | 07:34 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, basically the new version depends on debugedit which is built from the rpm source on focal and Steve said rpm wasn't something we wanted built on i386 | 07:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so its being worked on, nice thanks! | 07:36 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, discussions were to backport a split debugedit as in newer series or to revert that depends | 07:36 |
| seb128 | I guess, I'm not involved into fixing it, I just know about the topic because I got pinged about adding the missing depends on i386 | 07:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, btw we don't need to bring rpm on i386, we can backport debugedit from jammy? | 07:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | debugedit has its own package now | 07:37 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, that's what I just wrote 3 lines up? | 07:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | oh yes indeed | 07:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | let me grab some coffee then :) | 07:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks | 07:38 |
| seb128 | np! | 07:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so we need this change on focal https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpm/4.16.1.2+dfsg1-3ubuntu1 | 07:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (in case we want to do the split) | 07:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-openstackclient [source] (jammy-proposed) [5.8.0-0ubuntu1] | 08:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibus [sync] (jammy-proposed) [1.5.26-3] | 08:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nautilus-share [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.7.3-2ubuntu6] | 08:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lm-sensors [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:3.6.0-7ubuntu1] | 08:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-tweak [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.04.8-0ubuntu2] | 08:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-settings [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.04.6] | 08:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-ovsdbapp [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.15.1-0ubuntu2] | 08:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (jammy-proposed) [2:20.0.0-0ubuntu2] | 08:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-artwork [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.04.13] | 08:05 | |
| seb128 | sil2100, hey, do you think we could have a langpack update? did we stop the weekly job before beta? Gunnar did tweaks to fix gnome-desktop missing after the package was renamed and I would like to confirm that it's resolved | 08:25 |
| sil2100 | seb128: hey! I think there should be one automatic happening today! | 08:25 |
| seb128 | ah, great, thanks! | 08:25 |
| sil2100 | I re-enabled the automatic updates yesterday and I think those are planned on Tuesdays | 08:25 |
| sil2100 | I'll make sure to check up on if it's happening or not later today o/ | 08:26 |
| juliank | doko: I see a mercurial 6.1 sync by you, but no FFe, and it ftbfs? | 08:29 |
| juliank | 7 tests failed :( | 08:30 |
| juliank | various new features, backwards incompatible changes | 08:32 |
| juliank | it seems we're down to 6 packages from the ppc64el rebuild that have not migrated yet | 08:35 |
| juliank | tmux is regressed only on ppc64el, which is dubious | 08:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ubuntu-archive please NBS cleanup old binaries left on riscv64: liblldb-dev, libllvm-ocaml-dev, libomp-dev, libomp5, lld, lldb, python3-lldb (from 0.55~exp1) | 11:02 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dask (jammy-proposed/universe) [2022.01.0+dfsg-1 => 2022.01.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 11:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dask [source] (jammy-proposed) [2022.01.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 11:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.04.11] | 11:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zenity [sync] (jammy-proposed) [3.42.0-1] | 11:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qt6-webengine (jammy-proposed/universe) [6.2.4+dfsg-1ubuntu1 => 6.2.4+dfsg-1ubuntu2] (no packageset) (sync) | 11:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qt6-webengine [sync] (jammy-proposed) [6.2.4+dfsg-1ubuntu2] | 11:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-power-manager (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.26.0-1 => 1.26.0-1ubuntu0] (ubuntu-mate) | 12:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-artwork (jammy-proposed/universe) [22.04.13 => 22.04.14] (ubuntu-mate) | 12:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ayatana-indicator-power (jammy-proposed/universe) [22.2.0-1 => 22.2.0-1ubuntu0] (ubuntu-mate) | 12:39 | |
| Wimpy | Please accept mate-power-manager 1.26.0-1ubuntu0 and ubuntu-mate-artwork 22.04.14 and ayatana-indicator-power 22.2.0-1ubuntu0, they are all fixes for #1967854 | 12:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: php-malkusch-lock (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.2+ds.1-2build1 => 2.2+ds.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 12:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php-malkusch-lock [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.2+ds.1-2ubuntu1] | 12:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libnotify (jammy-proposed/main) [0.7.9-3ubuntu4 => 0.7.9-3ubuntu5] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 12:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wpewebkit (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.36.0-1 => 2.36.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 13:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wpewebkit [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.36.0-2ubuntu1] | 13:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shotwell (jammy-proposed/main) [0.30.14-1ubuntu4 => 0.30.14-1ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop) | 13:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (jammy-proposed/main) [1.36.4-1ubuntu1 => 1.36.4-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 13:36 | |
| paride | sil2100, hi! Do you know if headers/footers like https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/jammy/beta/HEADER.html are maintained in VCS somewhere? | 13:41 |
| paride | sil2100, I kind of remember you editing one, but I'm not sure of where/how | 13:41 |
| sil2100 | paride: hey! Not really, those are edited by the ubuntu-cdimage code dynamically and/or edited manually (when tweaks are needed) | 13:42 |
| sil2100 | Do you want something changed? | 13:42 |
| paride | sil2100, yep, we want to remove POWER8 from the Jammy server images pages | 13:42 |
| sil2100 | paride: on it! | 13:43 |
| sil2100 | Ah, right, baseline bump, forgot that we mention it here | 13:43 |
| paride | sil2100, I'm not sure on how stuff is moved around. Maybe we should update https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-live/current/HEADER.html and that will end in https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/releases/jammy/beta and /release automatically? | 13:45 |
| doko | juliank: 6.0.1 even ftbfs with python 3.10 ... | 14:16 |
| juliank | doko: everything ftbfs, the world is broken! | 14:33 |
| juliank | doko: still, that needed a ffe? | 14:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: scikit-learn (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.23.2-5ubuntu5 => 0.23.2-5ubuntu6] (no packageset) | 14:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted scikit-learn [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.23.2-5ubuntu6] | 14:36 | |
| sil2100 | paride: it's a bit ugly, but basically whenever cdimage publishes some images, it generates those dynamically based on what images it wants to publish (what image types, arches, series etc.) | 14:47 |
| sil2100 | (apologies, was in a meeting!) | 14:47 |
| sil2100 | I have changes to cdimage to tweak this for the future, but also will tweak the beta released tree manually | 14:47 |
| sil2100 | (since those won't be updated unless we publish some new beta images ;p) | 14:47 |
| paride | sil2100, that sounds good, thanks! | 14:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backport-iwlwifi-dkms (jammy-proposed/universe) [9858-0ubuntu1 => 9858-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 14:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted backport-iwlwifi-dkms [source] (jammy-proposed) [9858-0ubuntu2] | 14:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backport-iwlwifi-dkms (impish-proposed/universe) [9340-0ubuntu4 => 9580-0ubuntu1~21.10.1.1] (no packageset) | 15:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backport-iwlwifi-dkms (focal-proposed/universe) [8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.4 => 9580-0ubuntu1~20.04.1.1] (no packageset) | 15:09 | |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: NBS done | 15:09 |
| sil2100 | Wimpy: weird version number! 1.26.0-1ubuntu0 | 15:12 |
| sil2100 | Wimpy: I must say that I never saw ubuntu0 being used before | 15:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-power-manager [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.26.0-1ubuntu0] | 15:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-artwork [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.04.14] | 15:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (jammy-proposed/main) [3.192.53 => 3.192.54] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 15:14 | |
| sil2100 | Actually, maybe that's even wrong to use here, hmm, might have not accepted those | 15:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ayatana-indicator-power [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.2.0-1ubuntu0] | 15:14 | |
| sil2100 | Oh well! | 15:14 |
| seb128 | sil2100, why would it be wrong? | 15:15 |
| seb128 | it's a bit weird but 1ubuntu0 < 1ubuntu1 | 15:15 |
| seb128 | so it's a clear update path | 15:16 |
| juliank | you then have to sru it as 1ubuntu0~20.04.1 or something instead of being able to use 1ubuntu0.20.04.1, but meh | 15:16 |
| sil2100 | seb128: stylistically mostly! But there is an edge case I can think of - if someone would like to backport 22.2.0-1ubuntu0 in the normal SRU versioning of 22.2.0-1ubuntu0.1 or 22.2.0-1ubuntu0.series, this wouldn't work anymore | 15:17 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, as juliank mentioned | 15:17 |
| sil2100 | But essentially, nothing super wrong in it | 15:17 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libnotify [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.7.9-3ubuntu5] | 15:19 | |
| Wimpy | sil2100: Thanks. I use ubuntu0 to denote ubuntu uploads where I've already pushed commits to Debian. So I can easily see what to sync next cycle. | 15:19 |
| seb128 | Wimpy, if you don't have a delta you want to keep you can upload a revision without 'ubuntu' so it autosync, like 1+fakesync1 | 15:22 |
| schopin | Oh? That's a neat trick! | 15:25 |
| seb128 | yes, the autosync job only skip versions which include 'ubuntu' | 15:26 |
| Wimpy | seb128: Thanks for the tip! | 15:27 |
| seb128 | np! | 15:27 |
| fossfreedom | Anyone on release duty that has a spare cycle please? Ubuntu Budgie jammy daily has failed again today ... 3rd time in a row. Doesn't feel like a glitch to me. | 15:29 |
| sil2100 | fossfreedom: how did it fail? Do you have a build log handy? | 15:31 |
| sil2100 | Found it | 15:31 |
| sil2100 | eh, it's the same issue as always - problem opening the seeds | 15:32 |
| sil2100 | I sadly have no workaround for this besides re-trying the build - let me do that | 15:32 |
| RikMills | that is the same infra issue that cjwatson has been tracking | 15:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sra-sdk (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.11.3+dfsg-1 => 2.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:32 | |
| fossfreedom | Are we just incredibly unlucky? | 15:32 |
| RikMills | fossfreedom: yes | 15:32 |
| fossfreedom | 😞 | 15:33 |
| fossfreedom | Fair enough. Thx. | 15:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sra-sdk [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 15:33 | |
| sil2100 | fossfreedom: rebuild requested | 15:33 |
| RikMills | I have plenty of emails saying the kubuntu build failed for that reason | 15:33 |
| RikMills | a retry may or may not succeed | 15:34 |
| RikMills | in fact, it is mildly surprising budgie had not seen this much until now | 15:35 |
| RikMills | as it has been an issue for some time | 15:35 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ddcci-driver-linux (focal-proposed/universe) [0.3.3-1 => 0.3.3-1ubuntu0.1] (kernel-dkms) | 15:42 | |
| vorlon | ginggs: looks like python3-stdlib-extensions is currently blocked by python3.9 removal, and python3.9 has a few revdeps still. Any help needed there? | 15:58 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: manila (impish-proposed/universe) [1:13.0.0-0ubuntu2 => 1:13.0.2-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 16:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: waitress (jammy-proposed/main) [1.4.4-1.1 => 1.4.4-1.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 16:46 | |
| vorlon | an easy action for someone would be to clean up mythexport so that it is not building on architectures where it will be uninstallable https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/jammy_uninst.txt | 18:53 |
| vorlon | huh wonder how I ended up deleting libpth20:i386 when gcc-9 needed it | 18:59 |
| ginggs | vorlon: there are some things still on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/python3.10-only.html that more eyes on would be great | 19:03 |
| ginggs | scikit-learn should be fixed by my last upload | 19:04 |
| ginggs | thrift's binaries need accepting | 19:04 |
| vorlon | looking | 19:05 |
| ginggs | gudhi OOM'd on amd64, but after fixing that locally, it now seems to FTBFS due to the latest qt5 upload | 19:05 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted thrift [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [0.16.0-2] | 19:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted thrift [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [0.16.0-2] | 19:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted thrift [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [0.16.0-2] | 19:06 | |
| ginggs | gudhi FTBFS everywhere now, that is | 19:06 |
| ginggs | vorlon: thanks :) | 19:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted thrift [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.16.0-2] | 19:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted thrift [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [0.16.0-2] | 19:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted thrift [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [0.16.0-2] | 19:06 | |
| ginggs | khmer has an incomplete patch in debian bug #1008402 | 19:07 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 1008402 in src:khmer "khmer: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p '3.10 3.9' returned exit code 13" [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1008402 | 19:07 |
| seb128 | vorlon, what were those 'no content' emails on j-changes list yesterday your evening? | 19:23 |
| vorlon | seb128: I'm not subscribed, can you give me a pointer? | 19:30 |
| vorlon | seb128: I guess https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/jammy-changes/2022-April/013299.html might be an example - I had run i386 binary removals with incorrect setup, so then I had to restore them. These were binary self-copies of the packages already in the jammy release pocket | 19:33 |
| seb128 | vorlon, ah ok, thanks. and yes that's one example | 19:34 |
| seb128 | vorlon, I was mostly asking because taking session-migration as an example I did add it to the whitelest and copied over doing 'copy-package -b --force-same-destination -e $version $pkg' but that didn't trigger a changes email | 19:35 |
| seb128 | vorlon, so I was wondering if I did something wrong you had to fix or if we were doing things differently | 19:35 |
| vorlon | hmm! that should be effectively equivalent to the command I ran | 19:35 |
| seb128 | k, weird, maybe the freeze is making a difference there? | 19:36 |
| seb128 | I did the enabling before we were frozen | 19:36 |
| vorlon | really have no idea, sorry | 19:36 |
| seb128 | no worry, I was just checking | 19:36 |
| seb128 | thanks! | 19:36 |
| vorlon | seb128: speaking of, now that jxrlib has been bootstrapped, can you please add it directly to the seed so that it can be dropped from the code? lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/i386 | 19:42 |
| vorlon | doko: you added strace back to the manual whitelist for i386; there is no rationale given in the code or the commit log and if I remove it from the code it drops out of the seed. I think we may have discussed this once before, but I don't remember the details. If this is a package you're saying needs to be available for its own purpose without revdeps, please move it to the seed; otherwise, can | 19:47 |
| vorlon | this be dropped? | 19:47 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libdmx from i386-whitelist in jammy | 19:59 | |
| seb128 | vorlon, sorry I don't really understand how the i386 whitelisting is working, I documented what I get on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration#i386_whitelist_updates , I would welcome you tweaking that to add more knowledge if possible | 20:08 |
| seb128 | like why do we need to add things to the code sometime if we have a seed? | 20:08 |
| vorlon | seb128: because seeds only operate on binary packages that already exist; so a code override is needed for bootstrapping | 20:08 |
| vorlon | let's see if I can log in to the wiki, there's an RT about that currently | 20:09 |
| seb128 | so the instructions should be to remove from the code directly after bootstrapping and edit the seed? | 20:09 |
| seb128 | if so why do we have such a list still in the code? | 20:09 |
| seb128 | thanks! | 20:09 |
| seb128 | $ grep -c newSet update-i386-whitelist | 20:10 |
| seb128 | 37 | 20:10 |
| vorlon | well I just removed some of them ;) | 20:10 |
| vorlon | and then some of them are special cases to let the ubuntu-toolchain PPA build packages in series for which the source package doesn't exist in the main archive | 20:11 |
| seb128 | from what you wrote I would understand that the steps are 'add special case, run script, wait for build, remove from code and add to seed' | 20:11 |
| vorlon | and then some of them are... incomplete | 20:11 |
| vorlon | yeah, that's how I would describe it | 20:11 |
| seb128 | so I would expect that list to be always ~0 | 20:11 |
| seb128 | I meant outside of the period it takes to bootstrap an addition | 20:12 |
| vorlon | and yeah I can't log in to the wiki | 20:12 |
| seb128 | :( | 20:12 |
| vorlon | my goal is that every exception in that script is either removed, or clearly documented. We are.. far from that | 20:12 |
| seb128 | right, and I'm responsible for some of those since I didn't really understand the process, sorry | 20:13 |
| seb128 | I could log into the wiki btw | 20:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added rpcbind to i386-whitelist in jammy | 20:14 | |
| vorlon | still timing out for me | 20:15 |
| seb128 | vorlon, the last edit on https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/i386/tree/i386 is from july, doesn't sound right? | 20:16 |
| vorlon | seb128: that's actually what I see as well. It's infrequent that we update the seed, because only things that we *directly* declare that we support end up there - not new dependencies/build-dependencies that get bootstrapped | 20:17 |
| seb128 | ah, I see | 20:19 |
| seb128 | vorlon, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration?action=diff&rev2=321&rev1=320 , feel free to tweak later once you can connect again if needed | 20:20 |
| vorlon | cheers | 20:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wpewebkit (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.36.0-2ubuntu1 => 2.36.0-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 20:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wpewebkit [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.36.0-2ubuntu2] | 20:23 | |
| vorlon | ginggs: curiously the list of packages you gave wrt the transition appears to be disjoint from the set returned by 'reverse-depends src:python3.9' | 20:45 |
| vorlon | I guess that transition is maybe only looking at deps on *python3* (>= 3.9)? | 20:45 |
| vorlon | the blockers I see are esys-particle, csound, gyoto | 20:49 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnuradio (jammy-proposed/universe) [3.10.1.1-1 => 3.10.1.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 20:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnuradio [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.10.1.1-1ubuntu1] | 20:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted waitress [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.4.4-1.1ubuntu1] | 21:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.192.54] | 21:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.36.4-2ubuntu1] | 21:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shotwell [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.30.14-1ubuntu5] | 21:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (jammy-proposed/universe) [1:4.0.12-0ubuntu2 => 1:5.0.0~git2209-g5a7b9ce67-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server) | 22:09 | |
| mwhudson | vorlon: do you have any obvious targets for +1 time this week? | 23:03 |
| mwhudson | there | 23:03 |
| mwhudson | there's a bunch of garbage in proposed but most of it looks pretty garbagey to me | 23:04 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: well, I'd like less garbage in -proposed generally; but in particular I would like beignet ftbfs in -proposed fixed so I can remove llvm-9 which is gone from Debian | 23:04 |
| mwhudson | i guess there are some power9 rebuilds that might be interesting | 23:05 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: yikes | 23:06 |
| mwhudson | oh wait that's a binary that's the output of the build failing, i thought it was making gcc explode at first | 23:07 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: also there was my hint somewhere in scrollback that someone could clean mythexport up off of https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/jammy_uninst.txt by not having the package build on archs where it won't be installable | 23:15 |
| mwhudson | ack | 23:33 |
| mwhudson | i do wonder about things like that. if someone builds mythtv or whatever for riscv64 do we need to come back and remember to change mythexport again? | 23:34 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: my preferred solution here is to update the package so the build-dependencies reflect the runtime dependencies; i.e. if it's mythtv that's missing and making it uninstallable, stick it in build-deps and then we don't have to worry about arch variation over time | 23:35 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: ah, neat | 23:36 |
| vorlon | the only thing I *won't* do is delete the binaries that are currently there, without a sourceful change, since they'll just grow back on the next upload :) | 23:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (focal-proposed) [1:0.9.0~0.20.04.7] | 23:51 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!