/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/04/19/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220418.2)00:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220418.2)00:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220418.2)01:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220418.2)01:00
=== plars_ is now known as plars
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220418.4)02:33
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
bdmurraysil2100: I'd like to have a speedy release of ubuntu-release-upgrader fixing bug 1968607. Agreed?08:20
ubottuBug 1968607 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Impish) "screen became locked during release upgrade" [Critical, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196860708:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity riscv64 [Jammy Final] (20220418.2) has been added08:31
bdmurrayFor the record sil2100 and I discussed this in person and he agreed with an early release of it08:41
sil2100+108:51
sil2100Ok everyone, we will be respinning 22.04 images shortly08:53
sil2100No real changes, but it seems the previous RCs were spun a bit too early and now they're out-of-sync with the jammy archive (re: vim and u-r-u)08:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)10:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)10:19
cjwatsonvorlon: perhaps laney's removal raced with a proposed-migration run already in progress.  That would be consistent with the LP UI, since it *does* show the -proposed source being deleted, it just only shows the deletion message resulting from the copy-and-delete step (which I hypothesize was effectively a second deletion)10:19
cjwatsonI haven't checked the DB, but that would make a certain amount of sense10:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)10:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)10:24
laneythat would make sense to me10:26
laneyexcept I think the block-proposed tags are read before the britney run starts10:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)10:27
laneyso I'm not sure why it would have seen that I had closed it10:27
laneywould need to double check the code :-)10:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)10:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)10:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)10:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)10:36
cjwatsonlaney: they are, but doesn't it work off published Packages/Sources files rather than directly from LP publication records?10:53
cjwatsonlaney: so the bug might be seen as closed even though Sources files are still from prior to the deletion10:53
cjwatsondistributed systems are hard10:53
laneyyeah we ask the API for the tags but the published archive for what packages exist, so there's a window of inconsistency there11:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity riscv64 [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)11:14
jbichaI need to remember to file 2 bugs next time 😢11:14
coreycbjamespage: thoughts on removing vmware-nsx from the archive? see vorlon's msg above.12:44
jamespagecoreycb: no objections from me12:46
jamespagecoreycb: although I see we have been pushing snapshots...12:47
jamespageoh I see its a r-dep12:47
coreycbjamespage: yes it depends on neutron-fwaas which is really out of date and abandoned at this point12:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)12:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)12:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)12:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)12:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)12:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)12:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ignition-gazebo (jammy-proposed/primary) [6.4.0+ds-0ubuntu1]13:00
coreycbvorlon: I've updated the bug to ask for removal of vmware-nsx as well13:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)13:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)13:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419)13:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu WSL [Jammy Final] (2189939148) has been added14:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-gazebo [source] (jammy-proposed) [6.4.0+ds-0ubuntu1]14:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419.1)15:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419.1)15:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419.1)15:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity riscv64 [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419.1)15:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Jammy Final] has been updated (20220419.1)15:03
vorlonseb128: desktop images are still oversized vs the stated limit for both focal and jammy; do you have a different limit you want to set?15:13
vorlonWimpy: size limit hasn't been updated yet for ubuntu-mate - do you want to just tell me what size you want and I can land the change?15:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ignition-gazebo [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [6.4.0+ds-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)15:15
seb128vorlon, when Brian asked about it a few weeks ago we replied that bumping to 3.6G seemed reasonable, could you edit it to that value if that wasn't done yet?15:17
vorlonseb128: ok. same for both focal and jammy?15:17
seb128yes15:17
rbasakvorlon: lucasmoura asked me to do a 0-day SRU review for ubuntu-advantage-tools. How does this work for an SRU team member? I have no queue control for Jammy I don't think, and won't expect to have that on day 0. And presumably we're skipping the paperwork and verification process anyway? Or are you expecting normal SRU paperwork?15:18
vorlonrbasak: normal SRU paperwork15:19
bdmurraynormal SRU paperwork15:19
bdmurrayubuntu-sru may have permission on day 0 but you could let a release team member know if its critical to get out on day zero15:19
rbasakOK thanks15:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-gazebo [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [6.4.0+ds-0ubuntu1]15:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ignition-gazebo [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [6.4.0+ds-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)15:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: rshell (jammy-proposed/primary) [0.0.31-0ubuntu1]15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-gazebo [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [6.4.0+ds-0ubuntu1]15:34
vorlonwaveform, jawn-smith: I'm not happy with taking 'rshell' as a package name for an Ubuntu-specific package; this is a dangerous bit of namespace homesteading15:38
jawn-smithI was actually wondering about the name tbh15:38
jawn-smithThough I don't think this is Ubuntu-specific. waveform has proposed the package to Debian as well15:39
vorlonyes but if we accept it in NEW here that's an Ubuntu-specific accept15:41
vorlonif it were accepted in Debian first, then no problem15:41
vorlonbut if Debian rejects the name and we accept it, we get a migration problem15:41
waveformyes, it's horribly reminiscent of good ol' rsh -- unfortunately, that is what the upstream's been called for some years now15:41
vorlonyes, but the binary package could have a longer, clarifying name15:42
vorlon(and source package)15:43
vorlonthe python module name is fine15:43
waveformpyboard-rshell? (it was originally intended for use with the "pyboard", a microcontroller specifically built around running micropython, although it now works with many more, including the pico)15:44
vorlonthat would work for me15:45
waveformwould you want just the source package name changed, or the /usr/bin binary too?15:45
waveformerm, I mean source+bin packages in addition to the /usr/bin binary15:46
vorlonwaveform: just the package name, because that's Debian namespace; shipping the program under the name that all the documentation on the wider Internet references is reasonable15:46
waveformokay, sounds good15:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected rshell [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.0.31-0ubuntu1]15:47
sil2100jchittum: heeeey, how's the 22.04 release looking from the CPC POV? Any blockers?15:48
jchittumwe're looking green15:48
jchittumsil2100: do you believe it to be safe to run preparatory builds tomorrow? we lack the staging ability of ISOs, but we can prep a daily "download" (the stuff on cloud-images.ubuntu.com) and be ready to build release images for all the other clouds15:58
sil2100jchittum: yeah, so far I think yes15:59
sil2100But I still want to wait for more testing feedback16:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ignition-launch (jammy-proposed/primary) [5.0.0+ds-0ubuntu1]16:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: text-engine (jammy-proposed/primary) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1]16:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-launch [source] (jammy-proposed) [5.0.0+ds-0ubuntu1]16:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ignition-launch [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [5.0.0+ds-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)16:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ignition-launch [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/none) [5.0.0+ds-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)16:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ignition-launch [armhf] (jammy-proposed/none) [5.0.0+ds-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)16:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-launch [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [5.0.0+ds-0ubuntu1]16:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-launch [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [5.0.0+ds-0ubuntu1]16:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ignition-launch [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [5.0.0+ds-0ubuntu1]16:40
Wimpyvorlon: 3.5GB should be suitable. Thanks for the offer.16:42
vorlonWimpy: ah, that's quite a jump from 2.8?  can do though16:44
WimpyJust trying to pick something that won't flap.16:45
vorlonack16:45
vorlonWimpy: now, ubuntu-mate on focal is actually at 3.8GB today...16:46
WimpyAhhh, because it has the NVIDIA drivers and Jammy does not.16:46
WimpySo, perhaps 4.0GB then?16:46
vorlonWimpy: do you want it at 4GB for both series?16:46
WimpyYeah, seems reasonable.16:46
vorlonok16:46
vorlonWimpy: pushed16:50
WimpyThanks!16:52
jawn-smithvorlon: pyboard-rshell uploaded17:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: pyboard-rshell (jammy-proposed/primary) [0.0.31-0ubuntu1]17:52
ahasenackhas anybody tried the minimal install, without updates? I just did it in a vm and can't get the graphical login to work, I just get a blank screen18:34
ahasenackI wasn't looking for this type of test when I started, so I'm about to retry, more carefully with my selections18:34
dbungertahasenack: given the mention of graphical login, is this the desktop iso?18:35
jbichaahasenack: what vm are you using?18:36
ahasenackdbungert: yes18:37
ahasenackjbicha: kvm on jammy itself, via libvirt18:37
ahasenackI just switched to xorg, and there the login worked18:37
jbichathat's what I was about to suggest :(18:37
ahasenackthe display is spice18:37
ahasenackI logged in on the console while the graphical display was dark, and wayland was running, as were a bunch of desktopy things18:38
ahasenackwhere is the wayland log?18:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: network-manager-sstp (jammy-proposed/primary) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1]18:43
rbasak^ this essentiall the same as what is in Debian NEW, but unfortunately therefore needs a full review.18:45
jbichaahasenack: I see that issue too. It works for me if enable 3D Acceleration (not enabled by default)19:21
jbichabut then there's also this really annoying issue (you have to toggle 3d accel): https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-boxes/-/issues/759#note_138605719:21
ahasenackhuh19:21
ubottuIssue 759 in GNOME/gnome-boxes "virtual machines won't work with 3d acceleration enabled" [Opened]19:21
ahasenackso wayland needs 3d accel?19:22
jbichaahasenack: on your jammy host computer, edit /usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-18.04.xml to remove the devices section. maybe reboot? then recreate your jammy guest19:33
ahasenackwhy 18.04?19:34
jbichathat worked for me with Boxes (I just needed to close Boxes, not reboot). That disables the 3D Acceleration feature (uses virgl)19:34
ahasenackare those the templates for virt-manager?19:34
jbichait's osinfo-db and I think virt-manager uses it. GNOME Boxes definitely does19:35
jbichait's 18.04 because I tested and thought things worked starting from 18.04 but clearly there are still bugs. Later releases derive from 18.04.19:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (focal-proposed/main) [1:3.36.5-0ubuntu3 => 1:3.36.5-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop)19:41
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: you've seen that jansson got stuck?20:29
ahasenackjbicha: ok, I removed devices from that file, will reinstall in a few, I have to run an errand20:31
ahasenackback21:08
ahasenackjbicha: the suggestion worked, I just added a comment to the bug21:26
ahasenacktcp scan, all ports (1-65535) finished, nothing was open in the live env21:42
ahasenackmaybe if "try ubuntu" is selected instead of "install ubuntu"?21:43
* ahasenack tries that21:43
ahasenackI see nothing in the live env either, when selecting "try ubuntu"21:48
ahasenacknot sure if there is a build id somewhere in /etc21:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: osinfo-db (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.20220214-1ubuntu1 => 0.20220214-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)21:50
ahasenackI do see "remote desktop" set to "on" in the "sharing" tab of settings...21:51
ahasenackin the live env21:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted osinfo-db [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.20220214-1ubuntu2]21:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freeipmi (focal-backports/main) [1.6.4-3ubuntu1.1 => 1.6.9-2~bpo20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)21:58
jbichaplease unblock osinfo-db to fix the black screen bug mentioned earlier23:19

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!