[07:58] <xypron> didrocks: where can I find the Ubuntu image related to in http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/432/builds/247164/downloads? I only see build logs.
[09:16] <xypron> I now used http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/jammy/20220419/jammy-server-cloudimg-amd64-wsl.rootfs.tar.gz for the test.
[09:19] <didrocks> xypron: hey! I think github forces people to be logged in to have access to assets
[09:19] <xypron> didrocks: I am logged in
[09:19] <didrocks> I’m unsure if we can relax the permissions
[09:20] <didrocks> argh, so that’s not sufficient :(
[09:20] <didrocks> I’m doing some fixes for the release, but I can have a look afterwards, it’s hard to test those permissions when you are in the group
[09:20] <xypron> didrocks: Under which link do you see the image?
[09:20] <didrocks> goal is for later to create a group in the microsoft store and gives the images access as pre-release
[09:21] <didrocks> for instance the latest one ready to be sideloaded is https://github.com/ubuntu/WSL/suites/6184626362/artifacts/217500043
[09:22] <xypron> didrocks: download works
[09:22] <didrocks> waow, it’s just that it’s hidden, interesting
[09:22] <xypron> didrocks: should I rerun the WSL test case with this?
[09:22] <didrocks> xypron: please do :)
[09:22] <didrocks> maybe the iso tracker can fetch the url and publish it then
[09:22] <didrocks> sil2100: ^
[09:28] <xypron> didrocks: the download contents don't fit to the test case http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/432/builds/247164/testcases/1739. There is not rootfs tar file included.
[09:34] <didrocks> xypron: testcase hasn’t been updated apparently, we are handling the tests directly on Windows now (it’s not formatted in the iso tracker format)
[10:06] <sil2100> didrocks: hm, why didn't the isotracker update to this image? Is  that the latest 22.04 build?
[10:11] <didrocks> sil2100: unsure why, you know the code, but yeah, it is (manual build from this morning)
[10:11] <sil2100> hm hm, let me dig into it then - thanks for the heads up :)
[10:14] <didrocks> sil2100: this build has been uploaded to the store
[10:16] <sil2100> didrocks: oh, no, actually it did seem to work, I just looked at the wrong url
[10:16] <sil2100> Since the isotracker reports https://github.com/ubuntu/WSL/actions/runs/2193855367, which seems to have the artifacts as you pasted above
[10:17] <sil2100> Although the testcase for the WSL testing seems to be wrong right now, not sure if jibel managed to write up something new
[10:18] <didrocks> I don’t think so, we have fighting new bugs in Windows Terminal right now…
[10:27] <sil2100> I think the test cases are more like a formality, so that's fine ;)
[11:49] <mirespace> hi, where can I take a look to the openjdk-17 code?
[11:55] <ahasenack> good morning
[11:55] <mirespace> hi ahasenack
[11:56] <ahasenack> hi mirespace
[11:56] <mirespace> I mean, I got it by dget, but I was wondering where it is as I didn't see on launchpad
[11:58] <ahasenack> mirespace: you mean git?
[11:58] <ahasenack> mirespace: it's not imported, I can kick an import if you want
[13:27] <mirespace> ahasenack: oook... sorry for not noticing the imported aspect... I think, for the moment, I don't need the import... thanks for the offering!
[13:27] <ahasenack> np, it's still importing, not done yet
[13:28] <mirespace> ahasenack: oh! thanks!
[14:52] <ddstreet> slyon did you see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1871538/comments/60
[14:53] <slyon> ddstreet: I didn't (was out last couple of weeks), thanks for the link, I'll read up on it
[17:34] <Mmike> Hi, folks. Where do I get ubuntu-server-22.04 install iso image? this one doesn't seem to have it: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/22.04/beta/ ?
[17:35] <dbungert> Mmike: try http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-live/20220419.1/
[17:36] <ogra> http://releases.ubuntu.com/jammy/
[17:36] <Mmike> dbungert++. thank you!
[17:54] <rbasak> cpaelzer: network-manager-sstp re-uploaded, fixed, and includes your requested debian/copyright change. Diff against the previous queue entry here: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/MMG3MwY5fS/
[17:55] <rbasak> I added the License text for both entries. The first is an inline entry since it only affects one file. The second is a usual reference-based one. Hope that's OK!