/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/04/25/#ubuntu-release.txt

* RikMills waits for killer kangaroo to open07:49
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
cpaelzerI consider that name unlikely but interesting :-)07:52
RikMillsindeed :P07:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu WSL [Jammy Final] has been updated (2218669216)08:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3 => 249.11-0ubuntu3.1] (core, i386-whitelist)09:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.1]09:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (impish-proposed) [248.3-1ubuntu8.6]09:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (focal-proposed) [245.4-4ubuntu3.17]09:33
jbichasil2100: good morning! besides gnome-control-center (didn't publish yet?), I'm requesting early promotion to jammy-updates for these high impact bug fixes: gtk4, evolution, gdm311:25
ahasenackis the NBS report broken, or really clean? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html12:47
apwit _should_ be really clean.  but ...12:50
jbichaahasenack: really clean https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-14-april-2022/27615/312:50
cpaelzerahasenack: really clean12:50
ahasenackallright12:51
ahasenackI'm starting my +1 maintenance week, and took a look there for incoming work12:51
ahasenackso, zero on that front :)12:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-music (jammy-proposed/universe) [41.0-4 => 41.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra)13:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-text-editor (jammy-proposed/universe) [42.0-2 => 42.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)13:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (focal-proposed/main) [2.0.6 => 2.0.8] (core, i386-whitelist)14:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (impish-proposed/main) [2.3.9 => 2.3.9ubuntu0.1] (core, i386-whitelist)14:17
toabctlsil2100, hey. I filled https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/distro-info-data/+bug/1970227 to get distro-info updated for 22.10 (kinetic)14:39
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1970227 in distro-info-data (Ubuntu) "Add Kinetic to distro-info-data" [Undecided, New]14:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: klibc (bionic-proposed/main) [2.0.4-9ubuntu2.1 => 2.0.4-9ubuntu2.2] (core)14:48
xypronWe should remove package khmer LP #197023215:06
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1970232 in khmer (Ubuntu) "Remove package khmer" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/197023215:06
=== lucasmoura_ is now known as lucasmoura
jbichasil2100: I see gnome-control-center in -updates and -security now but looks like it's still in -proposed too15:27
bdmurrayjbicha: that's normal with SRUs15:29
bdmurrayjbicha: see the -proposed cleanup section of the pending SRU report15:30
jbichathanks 🙂15:30
jbichabdmurray: are you able to review gtk4, evolution, gdm3 for early promotion to jammy-updates?15:31
bdmurrayjbicha: I'll have a look in a bit15:32
tumbleweedaha, we have a name15:37
tumbleweedanyone want to sanity check: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/distro-info-data/-/commit/af468a03d08ef4c813e8613b3e6fd55ce3553bdf15:42
ubottuCommit af468a0 in debian/distro-info-data "Add Ubuntu 22.10, Kinetic Kudu."15:42
toabctltumbleweed, out of interest - how do you know the exact eol date?15:43
tumbleweedtoabctl: from https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/kinetic-kudu-release-schedule/2726315:43
toabctlah, thx!15:44
tumbleweedwell I add 9 months to the release date15:44
tumbleweedand check that that doesn't land on a weekend15:44
tumbleweedthanks15:45
bdmurraytumbleweed: the eol should be in 202315:45
tumbleweedso it should :)15:46
bdmurrayvorlon: Given that you accepted the gdm3 SRU for jammy could you look at the early release of it?16:24
vorlonbdmurray: ok17:36
ricotzddstreet, hi :), would you have time to look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1969808 ? it is already uploaded and waiting in the focal queue18:19
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1969808 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) "[BPO] libreoffice 7.2.6 for focal" [Medium, In Progress]18:19
krytenhttps://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-upgrader/tree/do-release-upgrade#n161 - it would seem the error handling there on the 'lts' path should be differentiated to whether '-d' was passed or not, right?  Because it seems currently it always says no devel LTS version available even if one didn't pass '-d' to it, while it should say no newer LTS version available (which is currently the ...23:17
kryten... case at focal→jammy until the first point release of the latter).23:17

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!