[07:49] * RikMills waits for killer kangaroo to open === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer [07:52] I consider that name unlikely but interesting :-) [07:53] indeed :P [08:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu WSL [Jammy Final] has been updated (2218669216) [09:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3 => 249.11-0ubuntu3.1] (core, i386-whitelist) [09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.1] [09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (impish-proposed) [248.3-1ubuntu8.6] [09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (focal-proposed) [245.4-4ubuntu3.17] [11:25] sil2100: good morning! besides gnome-control-center (didn't publish yet?), I'm requesting early promotion to jammy-updates for these high impact bug fixes: gtk4, evolution, gdm3 [12:47] is the NBS report broken, or really clean? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html [12:50] it _should_ be really clean. but ... [12:50] ahasenack: really clean https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-14-april-2022/27615/3 [12:50] ahasenack: really clean [12:51] allright [12:51] I'm starting my +1 maintenance week, and took a look there for incoming work [12:51] so, zero on that front :) [13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-music (jammy-proposed/universe) [41.0-4 => 41.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra) [13:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-text-editor (jammy-proposed/universe) [42.0-2 => 42.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (focal-proposed/main) [2.0.6 => 2.0.8] (core, i386-whitelist) [14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (impish-proposed/main) [2.3.9 => 2.3.9ubuntu0.1] (core, i386-whitelist) [14:39] sil2100, hey. I filled https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/distro-info-data/+bug/1970227 to get distro-info updated for 22.10 (kinetic) [14:39] Launchpad bug 1970227 in distro-info-data (Ubuntu) "Add Kinetic to distro-info-data" [Undecided, New] [14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: klibc (bionic-proposed/main) [2.0.4-9ubuntu2.1 => 2.0.4-9ubuntu2.2] (core) [15:06] We should remove package khmer LP #1970232 [15:06] Launchpad bug 1970232 in khmer (Ubuntu) "Remove package khmer" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1970232 === lucasmoura_ is now known as lucasmoura [15:27] sil2100: I see gnome-control-center in -updates and -security now but looks like it's still in -proposed too [15:29] jbicha: that's normal with SRUs [15:30] jbicha: see the -proposed cleanup section of the pending SRU report [15:30] thanks 🙂 [15:31] bdmurray: are you able to review gtk4, evolution, gdm3 for early promotion to jammy-updates? [15:32] jbicha: I'll have a look in a bit [15:37] aha, we have a name [15:42] anyone want to sanity check: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/distro-info-data/-/commit/af468a03d08ef4c813e8613b3e6fd55ce3553bdf [15:42] Commit af468a0 in debian/distro-info-data "Add Ubuntu 22.10, Kinetic Kudu." [15:43] tumbleweed, out of interest - how do you know the exact eol date? [15:43] toabctl: from https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/kinetic-kudu-release-schedule/27263 [15:44] ah, thx! [15:44] well I add 9 months to the release date [15:44] and check that that doesn't land on a weekend [15:45] thanks [15:45] tumbleweed: the eol should be in 2023 [15:46] so it should :) [16:24] vorlon: Given that you accepted the gdm3 SRU for jammy could you look at the early release of it? [17:36] bdmurray: ok [18:19] ddstreet, hi :), would you have time to look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1969808 ? it is already uploaded and waiting in the focal queue [18:19] Launchpad bug 1969808 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) "[BPO] libreoffice 7.2.6 for focal" [Medium, In Progress] [23:17] https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-upgrader/tree/do-release-upgrade#n161 - it would seem the error handling there on the 'lts' path should be differentiated to whether '-d' was passed or not, right? Because it seems currently it always says no devel LTS version available even if one didn't pass '-d' to it, while it should say no newer LTS version available (which is currently the ... [23:17] ... case at focal→jammy until the first point release of the latter).