[06:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (impish-proposed/main) [2.3.9 => 2.3.9ubuntu0.1] (core, i386-whitelist) [08:57] what needs to be done to get debootstrap migrated from propsed for kinetic? according to https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#debootstrap it might need an approval [08:58] livefs builds on LP currently fail with "E: No such script: /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/kinetic" and that should be fixed with the debootstrap version from proposed [09:03] toabctl: essentially the kinetic kudu cycle isn't fully started yet, once that is done that blocker will be lifted [09:03] you'll see that the same statement is currently all across the excuses page and not specific to debootstrap [09:04] Once that happens I'd also expect that the channel subject here changes [09:05] cpaelzer, ok. thx! [09:40] whilst all of that is true, we often gave newer debootstrap to cpc team early to incorporate in their ppa's to build images.... which we need to fully open kinetic. in the past i did with Odd_Bloke [09:41] toabctl: if you need new debootstrap already, you can checkout lp:ubuntu-archive-tools and use ./copy-package --from ubuntu --to ppa:owner/ubuntu/ppa --suite kinetic-proposed --to-suite kinetic -b debootstrap to get builds going from your ppas. [09:42] also i wanted to change livebuild to always pass the extra arg gutsy, such that it can just build new releases without debootstrap symlink. [10:34] xnox, thx. that worked! [11:11] xnox, is there a trick to get debootstrap then build for all architectures? the ppa is https://launchpad.net/~cloudware/+archive/ubuntu/cpc-livecd-rootfs/+packages [11:12] the different archs are configured correctly in that PPA [11:14] ah. debootstrap is architecure:all . [11:45] toabctl: do not rebuild debootstrap, but copy with existing binaries... [11:45] toabctl: hence the "-b" option. [11:45] toabctl: and yeah, it is arch-all available on all arches straight away after publishing. [11:47] I used "./copy-package --from ubuntu --to ppa:cloudware/ubuntu/cpc-livecd-rootfs --suite kinetic-proposed --to-suite kinetic -b debootstrap". looks like that didn't trigger a rebuild . it's a bit confusing given that the launchpad UI shows "debootstrap 50 minutes ago [11:47] Successfully built" in its "latest updates" box [11:48] anyway - base builds and buildd builds are currently running... [11:50] toabctl: yeah, some of the messaging is confusing indeed. it's more related to when it was published, rather than built. [12:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: im-config (jammy-proposed/main) [0.50-2 => 0.51-1~ubuntu22.04.1] (desktop-core, input-methods) [14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-aiohttp (focal-proposed/universe) [3.6.2-1build1 => 3.6.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [14:55] vorlon: I think distro-info-data should also be copied to -security as it was previously [14:56] ah [14:58] bdmurray: done [15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kubuntu-meta (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.418 => 1.420] (kubuntu) [15:57] ddstreet, hi :), sorry to bother you again, could you please take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1969808 [15:57] Launchpad bug 1969808 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) "[BPO] libreoffice 7.2.6 for focal" [Medium, In Progress] [16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (focal-proposed/main) [2.54.3+20.04.1ubuntu0.2 => 2.54.3+20.04.1ubuntu0.3] (core) [16:43] RikMills[m]: https://code.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/kubuntu; I've updated the kubuntu-meta package and lp:ubuntu-archive-scripts to reference this repo instead of the bzr branches [17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nmap (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.92+dfsg2-1 => 7.92+dfsg2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [17:40] ogra: hi, do you have a link to that bacula discussion in a mailing list that you mentioned the other day? [17:41] ahasenack, https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/2022-April/307292.html [17:51] thx [19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (focal-proposed) [2.54.3+20.04.1ubuntu0.3] [19:19] cjwatson: a couple of diffs are still pending after 4 hours in the Unapproved queues [19:36] bdmurray: yes, yes they are [19:36] bdmurray: (due to an attempted migration of the machine that job runs on to PS5, which we've just finished rolling back) [19:38] the job is running now; it'll have a backlog but is catching up [19:38] vorlon: ack on the kubuntu seed, and thanks :) [19:56] bdmurray: please reset the phasing for gdm3 on jammy [20:45] join #java [20:51] jbicha: Given that the detected regression is about an increased rate of crashes I'd rather wait and see if it self resolves than override it. [20:55] bdmurray: does the phasing start back at 10% if the error rate declines enough? [20:59] jbicha: not it resumes at whatever percentage it last stopped at [21:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cross-toolchain-base (focal-proposed/main) [43ubuntu3.1 => 43ubuntu3.2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) [21:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cross-toolchain-base [source] (focal-proposed) [43ubuntu3.2] [22:17] https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html habemus britneiam [22:19] vivit! [22:19] *wow* that's a lot of tests in progress [22:21] ginggs, mwhudson: are there more toolchain uploads to happen before archive opening, beyond the openjdk that's in there? [22:22] vorlon: not from me [22:22] ok