[01:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.4.29-1ubuntu4.22 => 2.4.29-1ubuntu4.23] (ubuntu-server) [01:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.4.41-4ubuntu3.10 => 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.11] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [01:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (impish-proposed/main) [2.4.48-3.1ubuntu3.3 => 2.4.48-3.1ubuntu3.4] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [07:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxfce4util (kinetic-proposed/universe) [4.16.0-1 => 4.17.2-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-budgie, xubuntu) (sync) [07:36] (I know it'll be held, that's just from experimental.) [09:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.1.4-0ubuntu0.1] [11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nginx (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.18.0-6ubuntu14 => 1.18.0-6ubuntu14.1] (ubuntu-server) (sync) [11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fribidi (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.0.8-2ubuntu3 => 1.0.8-2ubuntu3.1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync) [11:21] I'd like to upload an addition of xl2tpd to lto-disabled-list and a rebuild of xl2tpd to be staged for Kinetic, so that there's an assurance against future regression in an SRU upload to xl2tpd to fix it for Jammy. It's a hot bug on Jammy so I'd like to SRU this asap. How should I stage the Kinetic upload? [11:21] Just stick it in the queue? [11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lto-disabled-list (kinetic-proposed/main) [24 => 25] (core, i386-whitelist) [11:39] ^ I did that [11:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-data-server (jammy-proposed/main) [3.44.0-2 => 3.44.1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) [12:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xl2tpd (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.3.16-1 => 1.3.16-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) [12:16] Morning! [12:18] Long time no see. Anyway, an SRU will be incoming, probably sometime this weekend, to fix the issue manually installing on btrfs for Studio and Lubuntu. Won't need a respin, maybe just a second set of eyes on the upload and the paperwork since I'm rusty. :) [12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (focal-backports) [1:7.2.6-0ubuntu0.21.10.1~bpo20.04.1] [12:29] ricotz sorry for the delay! [12:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution (jammy-proposed/universe) [3.44.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.44.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) [12:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-desktop (jammy-proposed/main) [42.0-1ubuntu1 => 42.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [12:46] ddstreet, thanks, I assume there was nothing to complain :) [12:52] yep looked fine to me :) [12:52] tsimonq2: do you have a bug report? [12:56] ddstreet, great [13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.16] [14:40] vorlon: sil2100 so britney has a lot of links from old tests that were run in jammy but links to kinetic pocket, and that 404s, because those failures were not copied over [14:49] juliank: sure; but those being missing doesn't cause britney to mis-promote any packages, and if the packages are stuck in -proposed for long enough the tests will get re-run, so this isn't a serious issue [14:49] yeah we just got confused, hadn't noticed that before [14:52] I disabled bos01 again, it ran without having been patched for the proxy and caused failures [14:54] And restarted those tests [14:54] but that was like 4 hours ago (just FYI) [14:55] yes; I had no information about what the patch was the proxy [15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libnotify (focal-proposed/main) [0.7.9-1ubuntu2 => 0.7.9-1ubuntu3.20.04.2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) [15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libnotify (jammy-proposed/main) [0.7.9-3ubuntu5 => 0.7.9-3ubuntu5.22.04.1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) [15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-iscsi [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.874-5ubuntu2.11] [15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [27.7~18.04.1 => 27.8~18.04.1] (core) [15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (focal-proposed/main) [27.7~20.04.1 => 27.8~20.04.1] (core) [15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [27.7~16.04.1 => 27.8~16.04.1] (no packageset) [15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (impish-proposed/main) [27.7~21.10.1 => 27.8~21.10.1] (core) [16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: macaulay2 (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.19.1+ds-6 => 1.19.1+ds-8] (no packageset) (sync) [16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted macaulay2 [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [1.19.1+ds-8] [16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: calamares-settings-ubuntu (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1:22.04.4 => 1:22.10.1] (lubuntu, ubuntustudio) [16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: json-c (kinetic-proposed/main) [0.15-2build4 => 0.16-1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync) [16:58] jbicha: It looks like gdm3 is fully phased now [17:01] thank you, next time I'll try to be more patient 😉 [17:02] base-files to migrate soon via skiptest. There was a bit of weirdness with some of the triggered tests not finishing - that bears watching, but the tests themselves are useless for validating the base-files update [17:03] "soon" == "now" [17:04] and retriggering debootstrap-triggered tests once that migrates [17:09] Please accept calamares-settings-ubuntu, it fixes an installer issue that I plan on submitting an SRU for. Would like to get one more round of testing prior to the SRU. Thanks. [17:12] tsimonq2: we don't do manual reviews of packages in unapproved while the archive is frozen, except for toolchain-related packages that need ordered acceptance. Everything else gets let in when the archive opens, and is not a blocker for SRU. [18:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: devscripts (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.22.1ubuntu1 => 2.22.1ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) [19:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nautilus (jammy-proposed/main) [1:42.0-1ubuntu2 => 1:42.1.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [19:36] vorlon bdmurray is distro-info getting updated this week? [19:36] been out of date since jammy [19:36] i thought it was part of the relese checklist items? [19:38] oh it did get updated two days ago... [19:39] AH 'phasing' is enabled for server systems now... [19:39] guess that's why i can't get it and my system is still out of date :) [19:41] phasing in apt? [19:41] it might be worth updating distro-info-data *before* the release so that people aren't stuck with out-of-data distro-info data after each release [19:41] yep apt phasing happens for desktop and server systems now [19:42] I don't recall seeing that in the release notes -- could someone who knows somerthing about it add it to the notes? [19:42] that was done for impish, i think [19:42] no 'phas' on that page either :( [19:43] i assume juliank would know the best wording to add to the notes [19:45] the distro-info-data update requires the release name, which we don't get before the prior release [19:47] ddstreet: sarnold please copy paste from 21.04, and add "Since 21.04," [19:49] juliank: beautiful! thanks :D will do [19:50] juliank: do you know how apt phasing works if for instance evolution 3.44.1 depends on evolution-data-server 3.44.1 and they both are going into -updates? [19:50] vorlon: perhaps we should just fully phase distro-info-data [19:50] https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345 [19:50] jbicha: it breaks/keeps back the upgrade [19:51] breaks? [19:51] jbicha: we need to add phased upgrade groups, for this and like grub stuff [19:52] jbicha: I'm not aware of this happening, but it could also decide to remove a package [19:52] But I think it should keep them at the old version [19:52] I'm mostly keeping the updates separated so that the dependency will get fully phased first, but I feel like I might have to push mutter & gnome-shell simultaneously for some future SRU [19:53] So far we had no breakage reports at least [19:53] But it's implemented using pinning to deny not fully phased updates [19:53] Not by reverting those upgrades that have not fully phased yet [19:53] Were fully means for your machine [19:54] There's more weirdness that we need launchpad feature work for to make nicer [19:55] Because it should keep old version in updates until new one reaches 100% === bdmurray changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: 22.04 Jammy Jellyfish | Archive: kinetic open | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Kinetic Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or whiskey | melius malum quod cognoscis | infinity, you will be missed [20:33] vorlon: Thanks for the clarification, I didn't know that it wasn't a blocker for an SRU. Thanks! [20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gjs (jammy-proposed/main) [1.72.0-1 => 1.72.0-3~ubuntu22.04.1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra, i386-whitelist, mozilla) [20:36] when someone has time, this SRU is quite important, as people with Turkish locale (at least) has a basically broken desktop ^ [20:45] bdmurray: are you planning to accept the Kinetic Unapproved queue or should I re-upload? [20:47] yeah, same question here :) [20:48] well actually in my case I'd wait for the debian sync, when debian wakes up... [20:49] Ah my question is answered in #ubuntu-devel [20:49] (the answer is yes) [21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted calamares-settings-ubuntu [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1:22.10.1] [21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lto-disabled-list [source] (kinetic-proposed) [25] [21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted devscripts [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2.22.1ubuntu2] [21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nmap [source] (kinetic-proposed) [7.92+dfsg2-1ubuntu1] [21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.4.0-13ubuntu1] [21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.482] [21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-calendar [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [42.0-1] [21:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info-data [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.52ubuntu1] [21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kubuntu-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.419] [21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lubuntu-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [22.10.1] [21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-budgie-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.95] [21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.283] [21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntukylin-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.47] [21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xubuntu-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2.242] [21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kubuntu-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.420] [21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-gnome-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.93] [21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.267] [21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-unity-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5] [21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fribidi [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.8-2ubuntu3.1] [21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxfce4util [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [4.17.2-1] [21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted json-c [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [0.16-1] [21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nginx [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [1.18.0-6ubuntu14.1] [21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnma [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.8.38-1] (desktop-core) [21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnma [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.8.38-1] (desktop-core) [21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnma [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.8.38-1] (desktop-core) [21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnma [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.8.38-1] [21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnma [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.8.38-1] [21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnma [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.8.38-1] [21:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnma [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.8.38-1] (desktop-core) [21:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnma [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.8.38-1] [22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [71.1-2] (core, i386-whitelist) [22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [i386] (kinetic-proposed/main) [71.1-2] (core, i386-whitelist) [22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/main) [71.1-2] (core, i386-whitelist) [22:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/main) [71.1-2] (core, i386-whitelist) [22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [71.1-2] [22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [71.1-2] [22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [i386] (kinetic-proposed) [71.1-2] [22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [71.1-2] [22:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/main) [71.1-2] (core, i386-whitelist) [22:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [71.1-2]