[01:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.4.29-1ubuntu4.22 => 2.4.29-1ubuntu4.23] (ubuntu-server)
[01:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.4.41-4ubuntu3.10 => 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.11] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[01:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (impish-proposed/main) [2.4.48-3.1ubuntu3.3 => 2.4.48-3.1ubuntu3.4] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[07:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxfce4util (kinetic-proposed/universe) [4.16.0-1 => 4.17.2-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-budgie, xubuntu) (sync)
[07:36] <Ukikie> (I know it'll be held, that's just from experimental.)
[09:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.1.4-0ubuntu0.1]
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nginx (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.18.0-6ubuntu14 => 1.18.0-6ubuntu14.1] (ubuntu-server) (sync)
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fribidi (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.0.8-2ubuntu3 => 1.0.8-2ubuntu3.1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[11:21] <rbasak> I'd like to upload an addition of xl2tpd to lto-disabled-list and a rebuild of xl2tpd to be staged for Kinetic, so that there's an assurance against future regression in an SRU upload to xl2tpd to fix it for Jammy. It's a hot bug on Jammy so I'd like to SRU this asap. How should I stage the Kinetic upload?
[11:21] <rbasak> Just stick it in the queue?
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lto-disabled-list (kinetic-proposed/main) [24 => 25] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:39] <rbasak> ^ I did that
[11:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-data-server (jammy-proposed/main) [3.44.0-2 => 3.44.1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[12:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xl2tpd (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.3.16-1 => 1.3.16-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[12:16] <tsimonq2> Morning!
[12:18] <tsimonq2> Long time no see. Anyway, an SRU will be incoming, probably sometime this weekend, to fix the issue manually installing on btrfs for Studio and Lubuntu. Won't need a respin, maybe just a second set of eyes on the upload and the paperwork since I'm rusty. :)
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (focal-backports) [1:7.2.6-0ubuntu0.21.10.1~bpo20.04.1]
[12:29] <ddstreet> ricotz sorry for the delay!
[12:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution (jammy-proposed/universe) [3.44.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.44.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin)
[12:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-desktop (jammy-proposed/main) [42.0-1ubuntu1 => 42.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[12:46] <ricotz> ddstreet, thanks, I assume there was nothing to complain :)
[12:52] <ddstreet> yep looked fine to me :)
[12:52] <jbicha> tsimonq2: do you have a bug report?
[12:56] <ricotz> ddstreet, great
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.16]
[14:40] <juliank> vorlon: sil2100 so britney has a lot of links from old tests that were run in jammy but links to kinetic pocket, and that 404s, because those failures were not copied over
[14:49] <vorlon> juliank: sure; but those being missing doesn't cause britney to mis-promote any packages, and if the packages are stuck in -proposed for long enough the tests will get re-run, so this isn't a serious issue
[14:49] <juliank> yeah we just got confused, hadn't noticed that before
[14:52] <juliank> I disabled bos01 again, it ran without having been patched for the proxy and caused failures
[14:54] <juliank> And restarted those tests
[14:54] <juliank> but that was like 4 hours ago (just FYI)
[14:55] <vorlon> yes; I had no information about what the patch was the proxy
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libnotify (focal-proposed/main) [0.7.9-1ubuntu2 => 0.7.9-1ubuntu3.20.04.2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libnotify (jammy-proposed/main) [0.7.9-3ubuntu5 => 0.7.9-3ubuntu5.22.04.1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-iscsi [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.874-5ubuntu2.11]
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [27.7~18.04.1 => 27.8~18.04.1] (core)
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (focal-proposed/main) [27.7~20.04.1 => 27.8~20.04.1] (core)
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [27.7~16.04.1 => 27.8~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (impish-proposed/main) [27.7~21.10.1 => 27.8~21.10.1] (core)
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: macaulay2 (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.19.1+ds-6 => 1.19.1+ds-8] (no packageset) (sync)
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted macaulay2 [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [1.19.1+ds-8]
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: calamares-settings-ubuntu (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1:22.04.4 => 1:22.10.1] (lubuntu, ubuntustudio)
[16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: json-c (kinetic-proposed/main) [0.15-2build4 => 0.16-1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[16:58] <bdmurray> jbicha: It looks like gdm3 is fully phased now
[17:01] <jbicha> thank you, next time I'll try to be more patient 😉
[17:02] <vorlon> base-files to migrate soon via skiptest.  There was a bit of weirdness with some of the triggered tests not finishing - that bears watching, but the tests themselves are useless for validating the base-files update
[17:03] <vorlon> "soon" == "now"
[17:04] <vorlon> and retriggering debootstrap-triggered tests once that migrates
[17:09] <tsimonq2> Please accept calamares-settings-ubuntu, it fixes an installer issue that I plan on submitting an SRU for. Would like to get one more round of testing prior to the SRU. Thanks.
[17:12] <vorlon> tsimonq2: we don't do manual reviews of packages in unapproved while the archive is frozen, except for toolchain-related packages that need ordered acceptance.  Everything else gets let in when the archive opens, and is not a blocker for SRU.
[18:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: devscripts (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.22.1ubuntu1 => 2.22.1ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nautilus (jammy-proposed/main) [1:42.0-1ubuntu2 => 1:42.1.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[19:36] <ddstreet> vorlon bdmurray is distro-info getting updated this week?
[19:36] <ddstreet> been out of date since jammy
[19:36] <ddstreet> i thought it was part of the relese checklist items?
[19:38] <ddstreet> oh it did get updated two days ago...
[19:39] <ddstreet> AH 'phasing' is enabled for server systems now...
[19:39] <ddstreet> guess that's why i can't get it and my system is still out of date :)
[19:41] <sarnold> phasing in apt?
[19:41] <ddstreet> it might be worth updating distro-info-data *before* the release so that people aren't stuck with out-of-data distro-info data after each release
[19:41] <ddstreet> yep apt phasing happens for desktop and server systems now
[19:42] <sarnold> I don't recall seeing that in the release notes -- could someone who knows somerthing about it add it to the notes?
[19:42] <ddstreet> that was done for impish, i think
[19:42] <sarnold> no 'phas' on that page either :(
[19:43] <ddstreet> i assume juliank would know the best wording to add to the notes
[19:45] <vorlon> the distro-info-data update requires the release name, which we don't get before the prior release
[19:47] <juliank> ddstreet: sarnold please copy paste from 21.04, and add "Since 21.04,"
[19:49] <sarnold> juliank: beautiful! thanks :D will do
[19:50] <jbicha> juliank: do you know how apt phasing works if for instance evolution 3.44.1 depends on evolution-data-server 3.44.1 and they both are going into -updates?
[19:50] <bdmurray> vorlon: perhaps we should just fully phase distro-info-data
[19:50] <bdmurray> https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345
[19:50] <juliank> jbicha: it breaks/keeps back the upgrade
[19:51] <jbicha> breaks?
[19:51] <juliank> jbicha: we need to  add phased upgrade groups, for this and like grub stuff
[19:52] <juliank> jbicha: I'm not aware of this happening, but it could also decide to remove a package
[19:52] <juliank> But I think it should keep them at the old version
[19:52] <jbicha> I'm mostly keeping the updates separated so that the dependency will get fully phased first, but I feel like I might have to push mutter & gnome-shell simultaneously for some future SRU
[19:53] <juliank> So far we had no breakage reports at least
[19:53] <juliank> But it's implemented using pinning to deny not fully phased updates
[19:53] <juliank> Not by reverting those upgrades that have not fully phased yet
[19:53] <juliank> Were fully means for your machine
[19:54] <juliank> There's more weirdness that we need launchpad feature work for to make nicer
[19:55] <juliank> Because it should keep old version in updates until new one reaches 100%
[20:33] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Thanks for the clarification, I didn't know that it wasn't a blocker for an SRU. Thanks!
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gjs (jammy-proposed/main) [1.72.0-1 => 1.72.0-3~ubuntu22.04.1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra, i386-whitelist, mozilla)
[20:36] <Trevinho> when someone has time, this SRU is quite important, as people with Turkish locale (at least) has a basically broken desktop ^
[20:45] <rbasak> bdmurray: are you planning to accept the Kinetic Unapproved queue or should I re-upload?
[20:47] <Trevinho> yeah, same question here :)
[20:48] <Trevinho> well actually in my case I'd wait for the debian sync, when debian wakes up...
[20:49] <rbasak> Ah my question is answered in #ubuntu-devel
[20:49] <rbasak> (the answer is yes)
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted calamares-settings-ubuntu [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1:22.10.1]
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lto-disabled-list [source] (kinetic-proposed) [25]
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted devscripts [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2.22.1ubuntu2]
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nmap [source] (kinetic-proposed) [7.92+dfsg2-1ubuntu1]
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.4.0-13ubuntu1]
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.482]
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-calendar [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [42.0-1]
[21:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info-data [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.52ubuntu1]
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kubuntu-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.419]
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lubuntu-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [22.10.1]
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-budgie-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.95]
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.283]
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntukylin-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.47]
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xubuntu-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2.242]
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kubuntu-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.420]
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-gnome-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.93]
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.267]
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-unity-meta [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5]
[21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fribidi [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.8-2ubuntu3.1]
[21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxfce4util [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [4.17.2-1]
[21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted json-c [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [0.16-1]
[21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nginx [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [1.18.0-6ubuntu14.1]
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnma [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.8.38-1] (desktop-core)
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnma [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.8.38-1] (desktop-core)
[21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnma [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.8.38-1] (desktop-core)
[21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnma [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.8.38-1]
[21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnma [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.8.38-1]
[21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnma [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.8.38-1]
[21:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnma [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.8.38-1] (desktop-core)
[21:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnma [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.8.38-1]
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [71.1-2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [i386] (kinetic-proposed/main) [71.1-2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/main) [71.1-2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[22:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/main) [71.1-2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [71.1-2]
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [71.1-2]
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [i386] (kinetic-proposed) [71.1-2]
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [71.1-2]
[22:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/main) [71.1-2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[22:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [71.1-2]