| mup | PR snapcraft#3722 closed: static: black update to 22 syntax <Created by sergiusens> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3722> | 00:16 |
|---|---|---|
| mup | PR snapcraft#3724 opened: spread: remove git user config from pbr test <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3724> | 00:21 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#3725 opened: tests: use lxd in clean provider test <Created by cmatsuoka> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3725> | 00:21 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#3605 closed: WIP: Add gnome-42 extension <Created by kenvandine> <Closed by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3605> | 01:11 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#3724 closed: spread: remove git user config from pbr test <Created by sergiusens> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3724> | 01:26 |
| mborzecki | morning | 05:55 |
| pstolowski | morning | 07:07 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#3725 closed: tests: use lxd in clean provider test <Created by cmatsuoka> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3725> | 09:06 |
| mvo | jamesh: out of curiosity, why is 11708 still draft? seems reviewers are happy with it | 10:05 |
| mup | PR snapd#11743 opened: o/devicestate: use snap handler for copying and checksuming preseeded snaps <Preseeding 🍞> <Created by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/11743> | 10:09 |
| jamesh | mvo: I've dropped the draft flag. I think there's probably still more stuff that needs to be added, but it gets us a fair way | 10:50 |
| jamesh | mvo: I'll need a new libseccomp for the futex_waitv bit to actually do anything though | 10:51 |
| jamesh | is there anything that can be done about the inclusive-naming-check CI test when I'm dealing with APIs that use the word "slave"? | 10:59 |
| transhumanist | figured I would ask: https://bpa.st/4U4A I added the section about svc with passthrough but it says Issues while validating snapcraft.yaml: mapping values are not allowed in this context on line 28, column 18 | 11:06 |
| transhumanist | as far as I know I am running latest of snapcraft | 11:07 |
| jamesh | transhumanist: remove two spaces on lines 28 and 29 | 11:11 |
| transhumanist | thanks james, that fixed that error then it generates this one : Issues while validating snapcraft.yaml: The 'apps/svc' property does not match the required schema: 'command' is a required property should svc be under anbox: instead? | 11:30 |
| transhumanist | sorry jamesh | 11:31 |
| jamesh | it depends on what you're trying to do. If you're adding a new daemon, you'll need to specify a command line to launch it. | 11:32 |
| jamesh | i.e. add a command: property | 11:32 |
| transhumanist | I am trying to get it so I can launch the app through systemd without permission denied error | 11:32 |
| transhumanist | there is a systemd directory in the container | 11:33 |
| transhumanist | should I be using that one instead? | 11:34 |
| transhumanist | my systemd configuration looks like this: https://bpa.st/Z47A but I think its probably not right | 11:36 |
| transhumanist | perhaps I should be just asking in the forum since it appears to be a very specific use case | 11:39 |
| jamesh | I really don't know enough about anbox to say for certain, but if you're executing scripts from within the snap rather than the endpoints it exposes in /snap/bin, you'll probably have trouble | 11:42 |
| jamesh | the commands in /snap/bin will have snapd set up the correct sandbox environment to run the snap's code. | 11:43 |
| transhumanist | you wouldn't have an article on this would you? I mean , it seems to me it makes sense to use the systemd service directory thats in the container if it actually works, yes? | 11:45 |
| transhumanist | yes thats the problem executing from outside the container | 11:46 |
| transhumanist | I will ask on the forum, thanks | 11:53 |
| mup | PR snapd#11744 opened: secboot: partial reprovision <Run nested> <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/11744> | 12:05 |
| mup | PR snapd#11714 closed: many: move recovery key responsibility to devicestate/secboot, prepare for a future with just optional recovery key <Run nested> <factory reset 🔌> <Created by pedronis> <Merged by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/11714> | 12:45 |
| mup | PR snapd#11745 opened: many: use UC20+/pre-UC20 in user messages as needed <Created by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/11745> | 12:45 |
| mup | PR snapd#11739 closed: gadget/install, o/devicestate: do not create recovery and reinstall keys during installation <Run nested> <Created by bboozzoo> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/11739> | 13:46 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#3726 opened: legacy command: remove close and release <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3726> | 15:47 |
| === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson | ||
| mup | PR snapcraft#3726 closed: legacy command: remove close and release <Created by sergiusens> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3726> | 17:22 |
| mup | PR snapd#11708 closed: interfaces: add a steam-support interface <Squash-merge> <Needs security review> <Created by jhenstridge> <Merged by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/11708> | 18:32 |
| mup | PR snapd#11746 opened: tests: install snapd while restoring in snap-mgmt <Simple 😃> <Run failed> <Created by sergiocazzolato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/11746> | 18:47 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#3727 opened: commands: status and list-tracks <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3727> | 18:57 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#3728 opened: ci: disable Python 3.9 unit testing <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3728> | 19:57 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#3718 closed: parts: run debug shell on build environment <Created by cmatsuoka> <Merged by cmatsuoka> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3718> | 21:57 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#3729 opened: parts: handle build base <Created by cmatsuoka> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3729> | 22:07 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#3728 closed: ci: disable Python 3.9 unit testing <Created by sergiusens> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3728> | 22:47 |
| diddledani | who is in charge of review-tools these days? https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/review-tools-doesnt-know-what-private-shared-memory-is/29767 | 23:12 |
| diddledani | also can you push internally to get the store team to stick to the rules - if a snap is rejected because of the review tools it is unfair that Canonical employees can override that for the Steam snap when the general public cannot do the same | 23:13 |
| ogra | diddledani, who says you can not ? just file a store request | 23:46 |
| diddledani | there's no wording in the automated denial that indicates that a store request would be considered | 23:47 |
| ogra | (there were bugs with the stre declaration which is why review-tools do not work yet, it is being fixed) | 23:47 |
| ogra | *store | 23:47 |
| ogra | (not sur ehow fast though, there is a sprint next week i think) | 23:48 |
| diddledani | the fact that it's an immediate denial rather than a "needs manual review" response to me alludes to there being no recourse | 23:48 |
| diddledani | even if there is recourse the messaging tells me otherwise | 23:49 |
| ogra | yeah thats the bug ... the declaration is wrong and tells review-tools to immediately reject (though i understood there are two parts of the prob this is just the one side i know) | 23:49 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!