[04:59] <yurtesen> utkarsh2102: good morning? 
[09:56] <utkarsh2102> yurtesen: hey! 
[09:57] <utkarsh2102> I saw your e-mail(s), and we've been trying to work out a path internally (basically I need a second opinion). 
[10:00] <utkarsh2102> I think it's still un-settled, we probably need to reach out to ubuntu-devel-discuss to decide on the path. 
[10:01] <utkarsh2102> I think Markus said we probably need a better fix (than what you have right now) to the problem. 
[10:01] <utkarsh2102> It looks like we will need to have a delta after all, given how we changed things in rsyslog. 
[12:09] <ahasenack> morning
[12:42] <yurtesen> utkarsh2102: do you have an idea about what that better fix would be? and how do we reach out to ubuntu-devel-discuss? do you do it or ? 
[18:18] <sergiodj> ahasenack: replied to your email on ubuntu-devel, hopefully with some useful info to confirm what I told you during standup
[18:19] <ahasenack> thx
[18:21] <sergiodj> ahasenack: are you still seeing mariadb in jammy-proposed?  I understand it's in unapproved, but my rmadison output is different than yours
[18:22] <ahasenack> sergiodj: rmadison doesn't show unapproved
[18:22] <sergiodj> exactly
[18:22] <ahasenack> sergiodj: it's here: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=maria
[18:22] <sergiodj> but the output you pasted shows the package in jammy-proposed
[18:23] <ahasenack> it was the same as in kinetic-proposed
[18:23] <ahasenack> and now it's gone, someone removed it
[18:24] <sergiodj> OK
[18:24] <sergiodj> strange
[18:24] <ahasenack> sorts out the versioning issue at least
[18:24] <ahasenack> I know how to version the jammy upload now
[18:24] <sergiodj> when I first replied to the MP (approving it), I looked at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mariadb-10.6 and noticed that there was nothing in jammy-proposed.  but then you replied back saying that it was still in proposed
[18:24] <sergiodj> anyway
[18:25] <ahasenack> rmadison and lp sometimes disagree
[18:25] <sergiodj> hmm
[18:25] <sergiodj> that may have been it, then
[21:05] <sergiodj> a PPA build for autofs was running for more than 14 hours.  I'm trying to cancel it
[21:05] <sergiodj> apparently it's going to take some time...
[21:30] <sergiodj> ahasenack: when you have the time, can you take a look at the kinetic MP for autofs as well?
[21:31] <sergiodj> it's exactly the same thing modulo the package version
[22:52] <ahasenack> yeah, forget ppas for the time being
[22:52] <ahasenack> I will
[22:53] <ahasenack> I thought I had looked at the kinetic one, and not jammy
[23:31] <sergiodj> ahasenack: thanks
[23:55] <FurretUber> Hi, earlier today, I went on #ubuntu asking about that ubuntu user that always seem to exist. I did add the runcmd to remove the ubuntu user, as suggested, but it was still there
[23:56] <FurretUber> Now I investigated further and found on syslog what is happening on GCE: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/x7BT3M8Dxw/ Basically, after the entire user-data is processed, the ubuntu user is created again 🤦️
[23:59] <oerheks> well, put in a script that creates your username of choice?