[20:35] <Bashing-om> UWN: Issue733 up for review and the final edits: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue733 :D
[20:52] <kryten> Bashing-om: In the Kinetic summary at the top I'd drop the release notes link and then put the "noted in media" header above the list as usual - also the 9to5linux link has gone off rails there.
[20:57] <kryten> And in the ubuntu-frame-osk summary the first sentence doesn't end with a period - though I see issue with that in context of version numbers, but in this case the beginning of the next sentence then looks odd..
[20:58] <kryten> In the Linux App Summit summary it should be spelled "in-person"
[21:00] <kryten> In fact the whole last part of it I think should read like this: "and in-person in Rovereto, Italy, with details provided including how to register and the keynote speaker."
[21:02] <kryten> And I think the Lubuntu review should be in the Press section rather than Other Community News.
[21:06] <Bashing-om> kryten: ack ^ working :D
[21:07] <kryten> And why is the Nginx thing in the Other Articles section?  It's not even an actual article or news item.
[21:11] <kryten> The Xfce apps update shouldn't be in Meeting Reports, since that's just a post by some blog rather than meeting minutes or something similar by some Ubuntu team - in the bulleted form I guess it could go in the Other Articles section instead.
[21:51] <Bashing-om> kryten: Most caught up - how about I run that "Xfce apps update" in Blogo - as it is from 9to5linux.com. I can take the time to make this right.
[21:53] <kryten> Yeah, that'd work as well.
[21:55] <Bashing-om> kryten: making up then in blgo section.
[22:19] <Bashing-om> kryten: guiverc: Several edits completed - how we looking now ?
[22:20] <guiverc> ack..  will look later
[22:21] <kryten> "Noted in the media:" still needs left-aligned.
[22:22] <kryten> And why did you drop the second blog post there?  I merely said it wasn't following formatting.
[22:22] <Bashing-om> kryten: K -
[22:27] <kryten> Ah, I see you made the latter a dedicated Blogo item.
[22:34] <Bashing-om> kryten: Ouch - should notta done it as Blogo ! removing !
[22:35] <kryten> What?  And here I stopped short of saying I agree with it being there.. :3
[22:36] <kryten> Because the topic of it is more generally about Kinetic rather than just it being opened for development.
[22:40] <Bashing-om> kryten: Well then I comply with that direction :D