[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lightyears [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: raft [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: raft [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: raft [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: raft [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: raft [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: raft [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2] (no packageset)
[15:07] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-archive? Please take a small cycle to ack papirus-colors? I'd very much like to get this in soon.
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-cargo-outdated [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.10.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-cargo-outdated [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.10.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-cargo-outdated [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.10.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-cargo-outdated [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.10.2-1] (no packageset)
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-cargo-outdated [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.10.2-1] (no packageset)
[19:27] <ricotz> Eickmeyer, you might want to follow this https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages#Going_through_MOTU
[19:28] <Eickmeyer> ricotz: I am a motu.
[19:29] <ricotz> Eickmeyer, ok, did you pepare a bug report explaining the nature of the package?
[19:29] <ricotz> *prepare
[19:29] <Eickmeyer> ricotz: I sure did.
[19:29] <ricotz> ok, but the changelog doesn't reference it
[19:29] <Eickmeyer> ricotz: Are you an archive admin?
[19:30] <ricotz> no
[19:30] <Eickmeyer> Ok, then I'd need someone to nack it so I can add the proper bug report to it.
[19:30] <Eickmeyer> Not my first rodeo getting a package added. Been doing this for over 4 years now.
[19:30] <Eickmeyer> Sometimes with, sometimes without a bug report referenced. It's usually not a blocker.
[19:31] <ricotz> Eickmeyer, pointing to the existing bug report here is easier to follow
[19:34] <Eickmeyer> ricotz: It's bug 1972071 (apparently hadn't filed it, but again, that hasn't been a blocker before, especially with a package so simple)
[19:35] <Eickmeyer> If there are issues, I usually get pinged here regardless.
[19:38] <ricotz> Eickmeyer, thanks, paperwork can be cumbersome but it is helpful