[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: stunnel4 (jammy-proposed/universe) [3:5.63-1build1 => 3:5.63-1build2] (i386-whitelist)
[08:28] <schopin> Damned. Could someone reject stunnel4 from jammy-proposed? Apparently I hadn't rooted out the jammy hardcoding in *all* my scripts.
[08:37] <rbasak> ^ done
[08:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected stunnel4 [source] (jammy-proposed) [3:5.63-1build2]
[08:40] <juliank> retried bos01 failures so far
[08:40] <juliank> ~75
[08:41] <juliank> I ran with 24 days max-age to catch some during archive opening mishaps; but this is basically retry-autopkgtest-regressions --log-regex 'autopkgtest-juju-4d1272-prod-proposed-migration-.@bos01' --max-age 1
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (bionic-proposed/main) [1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.17 => 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.18] (core)
[12:01] <Trevinho> hey, not sure what's going on with libnotify in jammy, being blocked by autopkgtests... as https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/jammy/update_excuses.html#libnotify doesn't mention anything useful
[12:01] <Trevinho> apparently firewalld test regression, but I can't see what's going on there
[12:07] <jbicha> Trevinho: that's an old comment, libnotify/jammy is no longer blocked by failed autopkgtests
[12:08] <Trevinho> jbicha: oh, ok... I was going through some skipped emails of the past days, understanding it now.
[12:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-net-ssh (jammy-proposed/universe) [1:6.1.0-2 => 1:6.1.0-3ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[13:49] <fheimes> Hi release-team, may I ask when the 20.04.5 point release is planned to be released?
[13:49] <fheimes> It's not in the release schedule, yet (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FocalFossa/ReleaseSchedule)
[13:49] <fheimes> but a customer/partner asked about it (so far I said "roughly mid August" - based on the previous releases ...)
[14:21] <bdmurray> fheimes: We'll have to sit down and coordinate with the 22.04.1 release (which happens the same month)
[14:23] <fheimes> ok (and not super urgent, I guess they were first of all fine with 'mid August' ...)
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [i386] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.59.0+dfsg1-1~ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[14:47] <kanashiro> it'd be great if someone from the SRU team could take a look at ruby-net-ssh in jammy-unapproved. It fixes vagrant in jammy which is pretty unusable because of openssl 3, I've seen many users complaining in upstream bug reports
[14:48] <bdmurray> noted
[14:49] <bdmurray> If an AA could reject cpufreqd and halide from jammy-proposed that would be great. They are leftover from before the release of jammy.
[14:51] <bdmurray> jbicha: WRT bug 1970041 apt's support of phased-updates would prevent the new gnome-text-editor from being installed without gtksourceview5 also being updated. juliank would know for sure though.
[14:53] <seb128> bdmurray, you mean delete from the proposed pocket?
[14:53] <seb128> bdmurray, don't we clean proposed before release? how did we end up with those leftovers?
[14:57] <bdmurray> seb128: Its step 35 here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NewReleaseCycleProcess and happens after the release. IIRC vorlon and sil2100 were looking at how to do it programatically instead of manually but may have missed a couple.
[14:58] <jbicha> bdmurray: apt phased updates is still kinda new and I just wanted to be safer
[14:58]  * rbasak is waiting for 48 (ftbfs on qa.ubuntuwire.com)
[14:59] <rbasak> wgrant: I wonder if you could do that now please? It's not blocked on anything I don't think.
[14:59] <bdmurray> I pinged wgrant but that was last week during the sprint.
[14:59] <seb128> bdmurray, removed
[14:59] <bdmurray> seb128: thanks!
[15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.59.0+dfsg1-1~ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[15:04] <jbicha> juliank: do you think there could be unexpected behavior from apt phased updates when a package has a bumped dependency on a phased update package (built from a different source package)?
[15:08] <juliank> if the dependency is not fully phased, the package won't be installable on systems where it is fully phased and not yet installed
[15:08] <juliank> on systems where it is installed, it should be kept back if there's different phasing level
[15:09] <juliank> you can also imagine it removes one package to upgrade another if phased differently, but I don't see that happening here
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.59.0+dfsg1-1~ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[15:09] <jbicha> temporary uninstallability sounds not great so in cases where they don't have to be updated at the same time, I just let the dependency fully phase first to avoid that
[15:10] <juliank> if the new tksourceview5 had a breaks gnome-text-edit (<< 42.1), it might choose to remove gnome-text-editor to upgrade gtksourceview5
[15:10] <juliank> but it also might keep it back
[15:10] <juliank> it will depend on your local system and what is installed
[15:11] <jbicha> it also sounded complicated to test this scenario; have to reimplement phased updates in a test apt archive or something (??)
[15:14] <bdmurray> I pretty sure you could modify the phased-update-percentage of the packages on your local system in the apt cache if you wanted
[15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-manager (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-0ubuntu2 => 0.3.0-0ubuntu2.1] (no packageset)
[15:55] <jbicha> bdmurray: could you review evolution-data-server/jammy ? it fixes the version uploaded to -proposed
[15:56] <bdmurray> Yes
[15:57] <bdmurray> kanashiro: not a blocker but "820 +# Some tests rely no ciphers which are considered legacy in OpenSSL 3"
[15:59] <kanashiro> bdmurray, yeah, we tried to avoid changing the whole test suite
[15:59] <bdmurray> kanashiro: there's a typo "no" vs "on".
[16:00] <bdmurray> kanashiro: Also is the SRU based on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-net-ssh/1:6.1.0-3 which isn't in Jammy?
[16:00] <kanashiro> ahh.. sorry. I did not notice that
[16:01] <kanashiro> bdmurray, it was in jammy-proposed I think
[16:01] <bdmurray> Where it failed to build.
[16:02] <kanashiro> yes, and now the build is fixed
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ruby-net-ssh [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:6.1.0-3ubuntu0.1]
[16:02] <bdmurray> Stil I don't think we want to update to -3 in an SRU
[16:04] <kanashiro> bdmurray, actually we need a patch included in -3
[16:05] <kanashiro> git-ubuntu imported the -3 version that's why I ended up applying the patches on top of that
[16:05] <kanashiro> if you prefer I can re-do everything
[16:06] <juliank> Oh also for the phasing grouping this complicates code a lot more, sigh
[16:07] <juliank> The magic code being added to always install phased updates from the source package if you installed a binary from the phased update
[16:07] <juliank> because with groups, which also need to be worked on for shim and shim-signed style scenarios; phasing happens by phasing group instead of source package
[16:07] <juliank> nasty
[16:08] <bdmurray> The Launchpad diff didn't show the changes in -3 so I don't know what was in them. Regardless, I think there should be an SRU bug about updating to -3 if that's the way you want to go.
[16:08] <kanashiro> bdmurray, I can included the patch in -3 to the patch set I am backporting
[16:09] <kanashiro> s/included/include
[16:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-data-server [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.44.1-0ubuntu2]
[16:37] <schopin> kanashiro: you mean the DSA signature patch, I'm guessing?
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-net-ssh (jammy-proposed/universe) [1:6.1.0-2 => 1:6.1.0-2ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[16:38] <kanashiro> schopin, yes, just added it to the patch set I was backporting ^
[16:38] <kanashiro> bdmurray, uploaded a new version ^
[16:59] <ricotz> hello ubuntu-archive, please restart https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rustc/1.59.0+dfsg1-1~ubuntu1/+build/23732265
[17:00] <bdmurray> ricotz: its currently building and any uploader of it should be able to restart it
[17:00] <bdmurray> er, anyone who can upload it
[17:00] <ricotz> bdmurray, it is stuck for 3 hours ;)
[17:00] <ricotz> schopin, hi ^
[17:00] <bdmurray> I'll restart it then
[17:01] <ricotz> bdmurray, thank you!
[17:07] <schopin> ricotz: fyi I am *not* amongst those who can upload it :D
[17:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-net-ssh [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:6.1.0-2ubuntu0.1]
[17:09] <ricotz> bdmurray, thank you, I guess the lcy02* builders are more broken again :(
[17:09] <ricotz> e.g. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blender/3.1.2+dfsg-1/+build/23586053 and https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain-r/+archive/ubuntu/test/+build/23729082
[17:10] <ricotz> schopin, ah, I see, the rustc/amd64 looks stuck again
[17:24] <bdmurray> blender retried
[17:28] <ricotz> rustc is stuck again :(
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.59.0+dfsg1-1~ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.59.0+dfsg1-1~ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[20:01] <bdmurray> retrying rustc again
[20:38] <ricotz> thx
[20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (focal-proposed) [3.192.30.11]
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (focal-proposed) [2.3ubuntu0.2]
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-aiohttp [source] (focal-proposed) [3.6.2-1ubuntu1]
[21:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.59.0+dfsg1-1~ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[21:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted quodlibet [source] (jammy-proposed) [4.4.0-2ubuntu0.1]
[21:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flash-kernel [source] (focal-proposed) [3.103ubuntu1~20.04.4]
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted freeradius [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0.20+dfsg-3ubuntu0.1]
[22:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libnotify [source] (focal-proposed) [0.7.9-1ubuntu3.20.04.2]
[22:12] <bdmurray> ddstreet: the upload of reprepro for bionic needs a bunch more information since its a version bump from 5.1.1-1 to 5.3.0-1.3
[22:26] <bdmurray> rustc built now
[23:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zenity [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.42.1-0ubuntu1]