/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/05/19/#ubuntu-devel.txt

=== sforshee_ is now known as sforshee
schopinI'm sponsoring a SRU, and the debdiff has some patch refreshes in there (only offsets, no fuzz). I personally wouldn't include those as it's just noise for the reviewers, but is it actually frowned upon, and if so documented?08:18
seb128schopin, it doesn't seem to be documented on the wiki, I think the smaller the diff is the easier it is to review for the SRU team so I would also avoid refreshing patches but I don't think it is considered as a blocker08:21
seb128would perhaps be nice to have the SRU team to add a note about that on the wiki guidelines08:21
=== bigon_ is now known as bigon
=== sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie
rbasakschopin: I agree it's just noise for reviewers. When training up/sponsoring new uploaders, I ask that quilt refreshes only take place when strictly required (ie. for casees where something doesn't apply or applies with fuzz only). And I ask that the quilt settings given at https://wiki.debian.org/UsingQuilt be used, to minimise noise in the future. I think this is all a basic uploader thing, rather11:11
rbasakthan anything SRU-specific.11:11
schopinCould a core dev click on the links pasted at https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/MR3Mmxrdkt/ ? TIA!11:43
seb128question for those who use grab-merge, is the unpacked dir it is giving supposed to be buildable once the conflict resolved?11:48
seb128taking wget as an example which only has a change in debian/control and debian/rules, the control conflicts, but once resolved that isn't building because there are diffs in .po files11:49
seb128is that expected?11:49
rbasakseb128: your issue reminds me of https://people.canonical.com/~cjwatson/dpkg-quilt-setup. I think that might be a solution - is it something to do with quilt patches applied but without a .pc directory?12:17
seb128rbasak, I don't think so, the patches don't touch the .po dir12:21
ginggsschopin: doesn't look like anybody else did, so doing now...12:58
sergiodjtjaalton: hey there, just checking if you're aware of/working on certmonger's FTBFS: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/certmonger/0.79.15-114:06
sergiodjI stumbled upon it while doing a test rebuild for the upcoming openldap 2.6 transition14:07
dbungertMay I get assistance with a retest? retry-autopkgtest-regressions|grep trigger=squashfs-tools15:53
vorlondbungert: doing15:53
dbungertvorlon: thanks!15:54
vorlondbungert: done15:54
vorlonogayot: fwiw my usual approach for a proxy issue like requests is to simply unset the proxy env vars from the test script in debian/tests.  If upstream decides not to take this patch, that's what I think we would fall back to - though hopefully they will agree that their test suite should pass regardless of the environment15:58
vorlonanyway, sponsored, thanks!15:58
ogayotvorlon: thanks, I'll take that approach going forward16:05
vorlonogayot: it doesn't work in cases that the autopkgtest is autogenerated by autodep8 :) (common for perl and ruby packages)16:05
ogayotas in Testsuit: autopkgtest-pkg-perl in d/control?16:07
ogayots/Testsuit/Testsuite/16:07
vorlonogayot: exactly16:07
ogayotthanks!16:07
vorlonin those cases, there's nothing in debian/tests to be patched16:07
vorlon(it would be nice to have an interface to autodep8 to override the environment, but this doesn't exist today!016:07
tjaaltonsergiodj: I heard about it, but debian isn't affected so I'm not sure what caused it18:12
sergiodjtjaalton: yeah, I noticed that as well.  I haven't investigated it (yet)18:14
sergiodjcurrently I'm dealing with other FTBFSes18:14
tjaaltonat least current upstream git doesn't seem to have anything useful18:15
sergiodjyeah...  I'm foreseeing some fun times ahead18:16
dbungertanother retest please? retry-autopkgtest-regressions|grep package=chkrootkit19:02
=== ckie is now known as cookie

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!