| quidnunc | rbasak: https://docs.huihoo.com/debian/manuals/maint-guide/ch-update.en.html this says "simply copy the debian/ directory if it was packaged with quilt". I think that package uses quilt (?). Can I do that? | 00:22 |
|---|---|---|
| quidnunc | Does gbp work with Fossil too? | 00:23 |
| === didrocks999 is now known as didrocks | ||
| cpaelzer | git-build-recipe --allow-fallback-to-native makes the content contiain a .git dir | 07:40 |
| cpaelzer | some packages build behavior changes in presence of one | 07:40 |
| cpaelzer | I should be able to remove the .git in d/rules as part of the recipe delta, but wanted to know if there is a more declarative/systematic way to avoid getting that .git in the final result? | 07:41 |
| cpaelzer | oh and local git-build-recipe behaves different than the one running on LP, I'm assuming one finds the tarball and makes it native and the others does not? | 07:45 |
| === alan_g_ is now known as alan_g | ||
| === sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie | ||
| jawn-smith | bdmurray, enr0n: my u-r-u MP has been approved | 15:50 |
| bdmurray | jawn-smith: great | 15:54 |
| enr0n | jawn-smith: thanks for the heads up | 15:55 |
| jawn-smith | Now that we have the code in good shape I'll make another MP to ubuntu/devel | 15:57 |
| jawn-smith | but first, a sandwich | 15:58 |
| jawn-smith | actually after discussing with waveform I don't think this needs a kinetic PR. Rather, the remove_uboot should be removed from kinetic | 17:02 |
| bdmurray | jawn-smith: is remove_uboot a quirk? | 17:05 |
| jawn-smith | bdmurray: yes, it is | 17:05 |
| bdmurray | jawn-smith: if its not relevant for an upgrade from J to K then it can be removed. Additionally, if your new quirk isn't relevant for J to K then it doesn't need to be in K even though its being SRU'ed to J | 17:07 |
| jawn-smith | bdmurray: that is correct, neither of these quirks are relevant for J to K upgrades | 17:07 |
| bdmurray | jawn-smith: Although given that the quirk is late you should think about people who have already upgraded to J | 17:08 |
| waveform | both the netplan and remove-uboot quirks are relevant for upgraders *to* jammy, but correct me if I'm wrong, as you can't skip an LTS when upgrading, that means all upgraders to kinetic (or ++) would *have* to pass thru jammy and so neither is necessary beyond that. The only reason I can think to leave either in beyond jammy is in case there's some future SRU back to jammy (so it *might* be worth gating both quirks on version <= 22.04?) | 17:12 |
| jawn-smith | bdmurray: since this breaks networking I don't think it's something that could be ignored for a long period of time. It therefore seems unlikely that someone would make it all the way to a kk upgrade without fixing this manually | 17:15 |
| bdmurray | jawn-smith: ack | 17:22 |
| dbungert | May I get assistance with a retest? https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=kinetic&arch=arm64&package=chkrootkit&trigger=binutils/2.38-4ubuntu1 | 21:15 |
| kanashiro | dbungert, done | 21:17 |
| dbungert | kanashiro: thanks! | 21:20 |
| bdmurray | While there isn't much in the queues right now I think it'd be better to provide a `retry-autopkgtest-regressions` command to run as taht will check for any existing queued tests. | 21:28 |
| dbungert | bdmurray: I actually asked that before, but it wasn't run yet, so I thought I might have better luck with the URL | 22:03 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!