=== didrocks999 is now known as didrocks [14:30] good morning [14:30] #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status [14:30] Meeting started at 14:30:23 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology [14:30] Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick [14:30] o/ [14:30] hiho sarnold didrocks slyon jamespage joalif [14:30] no previous actions to review [14:31] heyhey! o/ [14:31] let us get to the lists, accorindg to my inbox there might be a lot today [14:31] o/ [14:31] #topic current component mismatches [14:31] Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams [14:31] #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg [14:31] #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg [14:31] licensecheck would usually be foundations, seems like one of the explosions we also sometimes see with lintian [14:32] slyon: is this known in foundations already? [14:32] nothing new, IMO. jaraco.context needs to be looked at by openstack [14:32] cpaelzer: yes. the MIR is already filed: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1972853 [14:32] Launchpad bug 1972853 in libxs-parse-sublike-perl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] lib*-perl" [Undecided, Confirmed] [14:32] yes, but last week jamespage wasn't around [14:32] he is now [14:32] we did a combined MIR for all of those *-perl packages [14:32] jamespage: are you ok to take jaraco to your team? [14:32] slyon: great [14:33] (actuall, Simon did, kudos!) [14:33] on requests -> python-charset-normalizer, that was picke dup by server already (and had some help from people on +1 duty) [14:33] cpaelzer: yep [14:33] slyon: did that also include the perl things dependet on by sphinx? [14:33] Yes, we had olivier look into requests a bit, too. I think there was some exchange with the server team happening [14:33] yes - that is what i referred to [14:34] cpaelzer: yes. it also includes the sphinx changes. they are all very similar [14:34] libsoup is driven by the desktop team already [14:34] libqrtr-glib as well [14:34] nothing super new that needs action here I think [14:34] ACK [14:34] o/ [14:34] * cpaelzer feels good that teams are more on top of things nowadays! [14:34] #topic New MIRs [14:34] Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing [14:35] #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [14:35] yep that reflects what I meant with "seen many in my inbox" [14:35] wow [14:35] 13 to assign [14:36] of which 5 are hopefulyl-easy-perl cases [14:36] I can take that manila MIR - I've not been involved in that [14:36] didrocks: which of the desktop cases do you think benefit the most from you knowing Desktop better than the others? [14:36] thanks jamespage, assigning manila to you [14:36] @cpaelzer https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfreeaptx/+bug/1971767 shouldn't be there, i've done the review and got an ack from security too [14:36] beat you to it :) [14:37] cpaelzer: I think wireplumber, libsoup3, gnome-console [14:37] indeed joalif let me set the status right [14:37] didrocks: would you take these then [14:37] happy to take the 3 of them, not commiting to them for next week though [14:37] then we can re-look at the list and look to assign the rest starting with me and slyon [14:37] not-next-week is ok didrocks as long as it is not 6 weeks [14:37] yes. and joalif possibly? [14:38] definitively won’t be 6 [14:38] * didrocks just won 3 new tabs [14:38] haha [14:38] hehhe [14:38] ok updated the freeaptx case joalif [14:38] thanks [14:39] the perl'y things are probably all similar [14:40] and in the past often got a fast pass not needing security,but one never knows [14:40] they should be straight forward, yes [14:40] and it should be joalif or me [14:40] let me try [14:40] that leaves libldac libqtr-glib and ruby-webrick for joalif and slyon [14:40] could you pick those as you see fit? [14:40] so what do I get ? [14:40] I dont know any of those, so don't care [14:41] I can take the first two I guess :) [14:41] me neither [14:41] libldac and libqtr-glib [14:41] that'd leave ruby-webrick for joalif ? [14:41] and libdac ? [14:41] I have all assigned now [14:41] as discussed [14:41] thank you all [14:42] joalif: I'll take libldac, too [14:42] with so much inbound and plenty of PTO days coming (christian central europe Thu + often Fri) and Memorial day in US we should try to be fast, but might not make all of them by next week [14:42] just to set expectations for anyone watching, these might take a bit more [14:42] just refreshing the page… feeling better [14:42] \o/ [14:42] let us say 2 weeks :-) [14:43] #topic Incomplete bugs / questions [14:43] Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams [14:43] #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [14:43] amurray finished libfreeaptx while I was asleep (distributed companies are neat :) and telegraf is in-progress, but this week is my cve triage week, so less progress there than one might wish [14:43] oh sigh I jumped the gun didn't it [14:43] you did [14:43] none of the incompletes needs our acation [14:43] one is from last weeks meeting [14:43] and the other was just a tracking change [14:44] #topic MIR related Security Review Queue [14:44] Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable? [14:44] #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [14:44] see above :-) [14:44] seen freeaptx and glad to hear that telegraf is ongoing [14:44] sergiodj: ^^ FYI [14:44] sarnold: given the peak on the MIR queue today you can let the team know that quite likely a similar sized peak will hit your queue [14:45] *nod* [14:45] not all might need a security review [14:45] but relatively, there should be some [14:45] now would be a good time to ask if anyone would like a change of pace :) [14:45] TBH you (=security team) asked to get things early and we have seen many teams do so [14:45] so we should feel good about this [14:45] I do! [14:46] indeed, we are still far from FF [14:46] thanks on security then [14:46] it really does feel like things are clipping along nicely [14:46] or does it mean we will have a lot more at FF? :p [14:46] indeed [14:46] 22.04 was 'solid' things, and 22.10 is "lets get these new things going" [14:46] no, major shifts e.g. pipewire in desktop are causing half of them [14:46] #topic Any other business? [14:46] none here [14:46] nothing from me [14:46] none [14:46] nothing [14:47] me neither [14:47] ok, that was a lot already [14:47] thank you all [14:47] see you next week and happy reviewing [14:47] thanks cpaelzer, all :) [14:47] thanks! [14:47] thanks cpaelzer, all! [14:47] thanks all! [14:47] #endmeeting [14:47] Meeting ended at 14:47:58 UTC. Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-05-24-14.30.moin.txt [14:54] cpaelzer: sarnold: thanks! FWIW, telegraf is still FTBFSing on ppc64el and I intend to investigate/fix the issue later today